From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
???Sent: 06 April 2006 10:24To:
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.orgSubject: [HACKERS] pgadmin III's
Chinese simplified translations
i have continued the pgadmin III's Chinese simplified
translations,hope this
Now, it would certainly help if more people could actually help in
*answering* the bugs/questions that are posted :), but that's a
different question...
Well, that's my primary concern. It seems that people aren't
replying to bugs posted -bugs about the windows installer. I
just want
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Magnus Hagander
Sent: 07 April 2006 13:00
To: Jim C. Nasby
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows installer bugs (was: [BUGS]
BUG #2374: Installation Error)
You
On 4/7/06, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario Weilguni [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think all except the first one should raise a warning, isn't it?
to_timestamp (and friends) all seem to me to act pretty bizarre when
faced with input that doesn't match the given format string. However,
We (me and Oleg) are glad to present GIN to PostgreSQL. If community will agree,
we will commit it to HEAD branch.
http://www.sigaev.ru/gin/gin.gz
http://www.sigaev.ru/gin/README
Install:
% cd pgsql
% zcat gin.gz | patch -p0
make and initdb
README:
Gin for PostgreSQL
Gin stands for
to_timestamp is only for Oracle compatibility? I always thought it's some sort
of sql standard. What's the sql compliant way to do this?
Regards,
mario weilguni
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Tom Lane
Gesendet: Freitag,
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 05:05:12PM +0400, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
We (me and Oleg) are glad to present GIN to PostgreSQL. If community will
agree, we will commit it to HEAD branch.
http://www.sigaev.ru/gin/gin.gz
http://www.sigaev.ru/gin/README
Fantastic! I was thinking about this a while ago
2006/4/3, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jonah H. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
we're working on a prototype to reduce WAL I/O and index updates in a
large percentage of OLTP situations by employing an update-in-place
under *safe* conditions.
AFAICS there are no circumstances, ever, in
One addition - some results of Gin testing is available:
http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/oddmuse/index.cgi/GinTest
Oleg
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
We (me and Oleg) are glad to present GIN to PostgreSQL. If community will
agree, we will commit it to HEAD branch.
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 05:05:12PM +0400, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
We (me and Oleg) are glad to present GIN to PostgreSQL. If community will
agree, we will commit it to HEAD branch.
http://www.sigaev.ru/gin/gin.gz
http://www.sigaev.ru/gin/README
Nicolas Barbier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2006/4/3, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AFAICS there are no circumstances, ever, in which update-in-place is
safe. (No transaction can guarantee that it will commit.)
Updates to row values that did not escape the currect transaction
yet (ie, rows that
On 4/6/06, Qingqing Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonah H. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Great work! I had looked into this a little bit and came to the same
ideas/problems you did, but none of them seemed insurmountable at all.
I'd be interested in working with you on this if you'd
Can someone drop this puppy?
-Original Message-
From: System Administrator
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Undeliverable:Re: [GENERAL] stored proc vs sql query string
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended
Hello
1.11) How can I learn SQL?
...
There is also a nice tutorial at
http://www.intermedia.net/support/sql/sqltut.shtm, at
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/graeme_birchall/HTM_COOK.HTM, and
at http://sqlcourse.com.
first link is broken, second moved
Regards
Pavel Stehule
Qingquing,
First, I want to second Jonah's enthusiasm. This is very exciting!
Me, three! I didn't think this was ever going to come to Postgres absent
major corporate funding.
This is really only a gut feeling for me (it can't be otherwise, since
we can't yet test), but I think
On 4/7/06, Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com wrote:
So even on a single seq scan, parallel query
execution would make a significant difference
in performance, possibly as
much as +75% on seq scans of large tables.
I've been looking at several commercial systems which employ dynamic
partitioning
On Friday 07 April 2006 16:10, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
1.11) How can I learn SQL?
...
There is also a nice tutorial at
http://www.intermedia.net/support/sql/sqltut.shtm, at
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/graeme_birchall/HTM_COOK.HTM, and
at http://sqlcourse.com.
first link
17 matches
Mail list logo
