Magnus Hagander wrote:
Knut P. Lehre wrote:
Installing postgresql 8.2.0 on Windows XP Pro SP2 using the msi
installer dated 2006-12-04, with libeay32.dll and ssleay32.dll (both
dated 2005-07-06) (and libiconv-2.dll, libintl-2.dll, and libpq.dll)
from a previous installation (of version 8.0.5)
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:10:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Keep in mind it took years to get OpenSSL support up to the level we
have it now. It took SSL experts coming in and out of our development
process to get it 100% feature-complete.
Actually,
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Robert Treat wrote:
given options like --enable-dtrace and --with-libedit-preferred, I don't
find
this argument compelling...
Keep in mind it took years to get OpenSSL support up to the level we
have it now. It took SSL experts coming in and
* Andrew Dunstan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Keep in mind it took years to get OpenSSL support up to the level we
have it now. It took SSL experts coming in and out of our development
process to get it 100% feature-complete. Doing this for another
library, I am
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Keep in mind it took years to get OpenSSL support up to the level we
have it now. It took SSL experts coming in and out of our development
process to get it 100% feature-complete.
Actually, it's *not*
* Martijn van Oosterhout (kleptog@svana.org) wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:10:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Actually, it's *not* feature-complete even yet.
What's missing? I don't see anything on the TODO list relating to
this. If you wanted a GnuTLS patch that supported more features
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:12:47PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
We use it on some of our production systems (since it can
provide cracklib, password expiration, etc, and the postgres
instance inside it's own vserver so it doesn't hurt as much
Stephen Frost wrote:
* Martijn van Oosterhout (kleptog@svana.org) wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:10:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Actually, it's *not* feature-complete even yet.
What's missing? I don't see anything on the TODO list relating to
this. If you wanted a GnuTLS patch that
Kerberos is there and it's not too hard to use (though does depend
on the MIT Kerberos for Windows service currently). Supporting
SSPI/GSSAPI and then writing a small document on how to generate
Windows keytabs for Postgres would mean single-sign-on for Windows
users using applications which
This would be the big feature I think is missing from our current SSL
support. I don't think it'd be terribly difficult to support with
either library (I think most of the work would be on the PG user auth
side, which would be useable by either).
Wouldn't it be a lot more logical to
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 00:49 -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 12/29/06, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No code yet, and I don't remember who said they were working on it.
I'm still waiting to hear from Mark Cave-Ayland on whether he's going
to pick it up or whether I'll just do it.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 08:14:16AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
This would be the big feature I think is missing from our current SSL
support. I don't think it'd be terribly difficult to support with
either library (I think most of the work would be on the PG user auth
side, which
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:05:14PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Except tht X.509 is already done (in a sense). The client can supply a
certificate that the server can check, and vice-versa. You can't link
this with the postgresql username yet, but I havn't seen any proposals
about how
The reason I wanted to use PGP is that I already have a PGP key. X.509
certificates are far too complicated (a certificate authority is a
useless extra step in my case).
Complete side note but one feature that I brought up to my team a
potentially useful would be to allow the use of ssh keys
Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Robert Treat wrote:
given options like --enable-dtrace and --with-libedit-preferred, I don't
find
this argument compelling...
Keep in mind it took years to get OpenSSL support up to
Stephen Frost wrote:
Yet *having* that requirement on a *derived work* which includes GPL
code is *against* the terms of the GPL. That's *exactly* the issue.
The GPL says more than you must provide the source code to everything,
it explicitly includes a requirement that no additional
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:05:14PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Except tht X.509 is already done (in a sense). The client can supply a
certificate that the server can check, and vice-versa. You can't link
this with the postgresql username yet, but I havn't seen
If you want real language-lawyer over-reach, check out this 2003 posting
that says our BSD license wording is not compatible with the OpenBSD BSD
license:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2003-11/msg00212.php
OpenBSD feels the without fee can be misinterpreted, so PostgreSQL
Perhaps the file is not open at the time you are doing the fstat().
Also, context diffs (diff -c) are clearer for us.
---
Bill Moran wrote:
So I've got this patch (attached, against 8.2)
The goal is to track temp
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 13:44 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
If you want real language-lawyer over-reach, check out this 2003 posting
that says our BSD license wording is not compatible with the OpenBSD BSD
license:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2003-11/msg00212.php
OpenBSD
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
Yet *having* that requirement on a *derived work* which includes GPL
code is *against* the terms of the GPL. That's *exactly* the issue.
The GPL says more than you must provide the source code to everything,
it explicitly
* Magnus Hagander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Kerberos is there and it's not too hard to use (though does depend
on the MIT Kerberos for Windows service currently). Supporting
SSPI/GSSAPI and then writing a small document on how to generate
Windows keytabs for Postgres would mean
Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
Yet *having* that requirement on a *derived work* which includes GPL
code is *against* the terms of the GPL. That's *exactly* the issue.
The GPL says more than you must
* Magnus Hagander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
* Martijn van Oosterhout (kleptog@svana.org) wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:10:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Actually, it's *not* feature-complete even yet.
What's missing? I don't see anything on the TODO list relating to
* Magnus Hagander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:05:14PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Except tht X.509 is already done (in a sense). The client can supply a
certificate that the server can check, and vice-versa. You can't link
this
* Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The reason I wanted to use PGP is that I already have a PGP key. X.509
certificates are far too complicated (a certificate authority is a
useless extra step in my case).
Complete side note but one feature that I brought up to my team a
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 10:37:21AM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
leader is doing a nested loop and the follower which is just doing a
straight
sequential scan is being held back?
The follower will never be held back in my current implementation.
My current implementation relies on the
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
So it's *not* an additional restriction. Not to mention the other
reason- the license isn't part of the *work*.
It is an _additional_ license you have to include, not just their
license. I don't see how requiring an
Stephen Frost wrote:
* Magnus Hagander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Kerberos is there and it's not too hard to use (though does depend
on the MIT Kerberos for Windows service currently). Supporting
SSPI/GSSAPI and then writing a small document on how to generate
Windows keytabs for Postgres
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 14:28 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The reason I wanted to use PGP is that I already have a PGP key. X.509
certificates are far too complicated (a certificate authority is a
useless extra step in my case).
Complete
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I had to stuble together a Certificate Revocation List (CRL) patch for
8.2 from soneone's posted patch. I didn't even know what CRL was, and
got no feedback from the community, so I had to figure it out myself to
get it into CVS (for server and
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 07:22:21PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:49:55PM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:12:45 +0100
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:04:40PM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
So it's *not* an additional restriction. Not to mention the other
reason- the license isn't part of the *work*.
It is an _additional_ license you have to include, not
OK, wording updated. Thanks.
---
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 07:22:21PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:49:55PM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the
original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to
these terms and
Teodor Sigaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just a freshing for clean applying..
http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/user_defined_typmod-0.11.gz
Applied with some revisions, and pg_dump support and regression tests
added.
regards, tom lane
---(end of
Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the
original licensor to copy,
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the
original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to
these terms
Stephen Frost wrote:
1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's
source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you
conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate
copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep intact all the
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 05:03:23PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
much. This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
licenses. You're welcome to your own interpretation.
That was my point --- that it
Benny Amorsen wrote:
TL == Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TL Anyone against making it case-insensitive, speak now or hold your
TL peace.
SI-units are inherently case-sensitive. The obvious example is that
now you will allow people to specify an amount in millibytes, while
interpreting
Andrew Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree. But perhaps the solution instead of failing is to throw a
warning to the effect of Not to be pedantic, but you said mb and
millibits as a unit doesn't make sense in this context. Assuming you
meant MB (MegaBits). and then start up.
Generally
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 05:03:23PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
much. This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
licenses. You're
Tom Lane wrote:
What basically bothers me about this is that trying to support both the
OpenSSL and GNUTLS APIs is going to be an enormous investment of
development and maintenance effort, because it's such a nontrivial thing
Fascinating thread for the holidays. I found it interesting that
* David Boreham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Fascinating thread for the holidays. I found it interesting that nobody
has mentioned
NSS (former Netscape SSL library). It has its own bag of problems of
course, but
for me is potentially more attractive than GNU TLS. e.g. it has FIPS-140
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Somehow I don't think a statement requiring you to put some guys name
in all your advertising material is the same as requiring you to
preserve the copyright notice.
Agreed, but the words additional restrictions
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
much. This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
licenses. You're welcome to your own interpretation.
That was my point --- that it
Hi Jim,
The code has been fixed by Bruce in response to my bug#2851 (
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-12/msg00191.php).
BTW, I don't know how to make sure that the effect of a doc patch looks fine
in a browser. I mean, how to view the doc/src/sgml/*.sgml in a browser,
nicely
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
Hi Jim,
The code has been fixed by Bruce in response to my bug#2851 (
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-12/msg00191.php).
BTW, I don't know how to make sure that the effect of a doc patch looks
fine
in a browser. I mean, how to view the
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 22:18 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
much. This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
licenses. You're welcome
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 05:03:23PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
much. This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
licenses. You're welcome to your own interpretation.
That was my
On 12/31/06, Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
BTW, I don't know how to make sure that the effect of a doc patch looks
fine
in a browser. I mean, how to view the doc/src/sgml/*.sgml in a browser,
nicely formatted as we see on our website!
Docs for CVS HEAD
Seneca Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't have a core, but here's the CrashReporter output for both
of jackal's failed runs:
Wow, some actual data, rather than just noodling about how to get it ...
thanks!
...
11 postgres 0x0022b2e3 RelationIdGetRelation + 110 (relcache.c:1496)
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On 12/31/06, Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
BTW, I don't know how to make sure that the effect of a doc patch looks
fine
in a browser. I mean, how to view the doc/src/sgml/*.sgml in a browser,
nicely
On 12/31/06, Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On 12/31/06, Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
BTW, I don't know how to make sure that the effect of a doc patch
looks
fine
in a browser. I mean, how to view
The comment above TOAST_INDEX_HACK in tuptoaster.h is:
/*
* This enables de-toasting of index entries. Needed until VACUUM is
* smart enough to rebuild indexes from scratch.
*/
#define TOAST_INDEX_HACK
Do we already have a TODO item to remove this hack? If not, I think there
should be, because
56 matches
Mail list logo
