The comment above TOAST_INDEX_HACK in tuptoaster.h is:
/*
* This enables de-toasting of index entries. Needed until VACUUM is
* smart enough to rebuild indexes from scratch.
*/
#define TOAST_INDEX_HACK
Do we already have a TODO item to remove this hack? If not, I think there
should be, because
On 12/31/06, Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On 12/31/06, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> > > BTW, I don't know how to make sure that the effect of a doc patch
looks
> > > fine
> > > in a browser. I
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On 12/31/06, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> > > BTW, I don't know how to make sure that the effect of a doc patch looks
> > > fine
> > > in a browser. I mean, how to view the doc/src/sgml/*.sgml in a browser,
Seneca Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't have a core, but here's the CrashReporter output for both
> of jackal's failed runs:
Wow, some actual data, rather than just noodling about how to get it ...
thanks!
> ...
> 11 postgres 0x0022b2e3 RelationIdGetRelation + 110 (relcache.c:14
On 12/31/06, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> BTW, I don't know how to make sure that the effect of a doc patch looks
> fine
> in a browser. I mean, how to view the doc/src/sgml/*.sgml in a browser,
> nicely formatted as we see on our website!
>
Docs for CVS H
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 05:03:23PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
> > much. This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
> > licenses. You're welcome to your own interpretation.
> That
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 22:18 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
> > > much. This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
> > > licenses. You'
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> The code has been fixed by Bruce in response to my bug#2851 (
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-12/msg00191.php).
>
> BTW, I don't know how to make sure that the effect of a doc patch looks
> fine
> in a browser. I mean, how to view the doc/src
Hi Jim,
The code has been fixed by Bruce in response to my bug#2851 (
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-12/msg00191.php).
BTW, I don't know how to make sure that the effect of a doc patch looks fine
in a browser. I mean, how to view the doc/src/sgml/*.sgml in a browser,
nicely fo
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
> > much. This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
> > licenses. You're welcome to your own interpretation.
>
> That was my point ---
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > Somehow I don't think a statement requiring you to put some guys name
> > in all your advertising material is the same as requiring you to
> > preserve the copyright notice.
>
> Agreed, but the words "additional restric
* David Boreham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Fascinating thread for the holidays. I found it interesting that nobody
> has mentioned
> NSS (former Netscape SSL library). It has its own bag of problems of
> course, but
> for me is potentially more attractive than GNU TLS. e.g. it has FIPS-140
> c
Tom Lane wrote:
What basically bothers me about this is that trying to support both the
OpenSSL and GNUTLS APIs is going to be an enormous investment of
development and maintenance effort, because it's such a nontrivial thing
Fascinating thread for the holidays. I found it interesting that no
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 05:03:23PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
> > > much. This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
> > > licenses. You
"Andrew Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree. But perhaps the solution instead of failing is to throw a
> warning to the effect of "Not to be pedantic, but you said mb and
> millibits as a unit doesn't make sense in this context. Assuming you
> meant MB (MegaBits)." and then start up.
> G
Benny Amorsen wrote:
> > "TL" == Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> TL> Anyone against making it case-insensitive, speak now or hold your
> TL> peace.
>
> SI-units are inherently case-sensitive. The obvious example is that
> now you will allow people to specify an amount in millibytes, wh
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 05:03:23PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
> > much. This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
> > licenses. You're welcome to your own interpretation.
>
> That was my point --- tha
Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > 1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's
> > > source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you
> > > conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate
> > > copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep intact a
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > > 6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
> > > > Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the
> > > > original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to
> >
Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> * Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > 6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
> > > Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the
> > > original licensor to cop
Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just a freshing for clean applying..
> http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/user_defined_typmod-0.11.gz
Applied with some revisions, and pg_dump support and regression tests
added.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broad
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > 6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
> > Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the
> > original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to
> > these terms
OK, wording updated. Thanks.
---
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 07:22:21PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:49:55PM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > > On Tue, 26 Dec 2006
Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> * Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > So it's *not* an additional restriction. Not to mention the other
> > > reason- the license isn't part of the *work*.
> >
> > It is an _additional_ license you have to
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 07:22:21PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:49:55PM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:12:45 +0100
> > Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:04:40PM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > > > Now i
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I had to stuble together a Certificate Revocation List (CRL) patch for
> 8.2 from soneone's posted patch. I didn't even know what CRL was, and
> got no feedback from the community, so I had to figure it out myself to
> get it into CVS (for server and cl
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 14:28 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > > The reason I wanted to use PGP is that I already have a PGP key. X.509
> > > certificates are far too complicated (a certificate authority is a
> > > useless extra step in my case).
> >
Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Magnus Hagander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Kerberos is there and it's not too hard to use (though does depend
on the MIT Kerberos for Windows service currently). Supporting
SSPI/GSSAPI and then writing a small document on how to generate
Windows keytabs
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > So it's *not* an additional restriction. Not to mention the other
> > reason- the license isn't part of the *work*.
>
> It is an _additional_ license you have to include, not just their
> license. I don't see how requiring an
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 10:37:21AM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> > leader is doing a nested loop and the follower which is just doing a
> > straight
> > sequential scan is being held back?
> >
>
> The follower will never be held back in my current implementation.
>
> My current implementation reli
* Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > The reason I wanted to use PGP is that I already have a PGP key. X.509
> > certificates are far too complicated (a certificate authority is a
> > useless extra step in my case).
>
> Complete side note but one feature that I brought up to my team
* Magnus Hagander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:05:14PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> >> Except tht X.509 is already done (in a sense). The client can supply a
> >> certificate that the server can check, and vice-versa. You can't link
* Magnus Hagander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Martijn van Oosterhout (kleptog@svana.org) wrote:
> >> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:10:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Actually, it's *not* feature-complete even yet.
> >> What's missing? I don't see anything on the TODO list
Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> * Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > Yet *having* that requirement on a *derived work* which includes GPL
> > > code is *against* the terms of the GPL. That's *exactly* the issue.
> > > The GPL says more th
* Magnus Hagander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> Kerberos is there and it's not too hard to use (though does depend
> >> on the MIT Kerberos for Windows service currently). Supporting
> >> SSPI/GSSAPI and then writing a small document on how to generate
> >> Windows keytabs for Postgres would mea
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Yet *having* that requirement on a *derived work* which includes GPL
> > code is *against* the terms of the GPL. That's *exactly* the issue.
> > The GPL says more than "you must provide the source code to everything",
> > it exp
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 13:44 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If you want real language-lawyer over-reach, check out this 2003 posting
> that says our BSD license wording is not compatible with the OpenBSD BSD
> license:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2003-11/msg00212.php
>
> Ope
Perhaps the file is not open at the time you are doing the fstat().
Also, context diffs (diff -c) are clearer for us.
---
Bill Moran wrote:
>
> So I've got this patch (attached, against 8.2)
>
> The goal is to track temp
If you want real language-lawyer over-reach, check out this 2003 posting
that says our BSD license wording is not compatible with the OpenBSD BSD
license:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2003-11/msg00212.php
OpenBSD feels the "without fee" can be misinterpreted, so PostgreSQL w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:05:14PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>> Except tht X.509 is already done (in a sense). The client can supply a
>> certificate that the server can check, and vice-versa. You can't link
>> this with the postgresql username yet, but I havn'
Stephen Frost wrote:
> Yet *having* that requirement on a *derived work* which includes GPL
> code is *against* the terms of the GPL. That's *exactly* the issue.
> The GPL says more than "you must provide the source code to everything",
> it explicitly includes a requirement that no additional res
Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> * Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Robert Treat wrote:
> > > given options like --enable-dtrace and --with-libedit-preferred, I don't
> > > find
> > > this argument compelling...
> >
> > Keep in mind it took years to get OpenSSL
> The reason I wanted to use PGP is that I already have a PGP key. X.509
> certificates are far too complicated (a certificate authority is a
> useless extra step in my case).
Complete side note but one feature that I brought up to my team a
potentially useful would be to allow the use of ssh key
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:05:14PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Except tht X.509 is already done (in a sense). The client can supply a
> certificate that the server can check, and vice-versa. You can't link
> this with the postgresql username yet, but I havn't seen any proposals
> about h
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 08:14:16AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > > This would be the big feature I think is missing from our current SSL
> > > support. I don't think it'd be terribly difficult to support with
> > > either library (I think most of the work would be on the PG user auth
> > >
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 00:49 -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 12/29/06, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No code yet, and I don't remember who said they were working on it.
>
> I'm still waiting to hear from Mark Cave-Ayland on whether he's going
> to pick it up or whether I'll just d
> > This would be the big feature I think is missing from our current SSL
> > support. I don't think it'd be terribly difficult to support with
> > either library (I think most of the work would be on the PG user auth
> > side, which would be useable by either).
>
> Wouldn't it be a lot more log
>> Kerberos is there and it's not too hard to use (though does depend
>> on the MIT Kerberos for Windows service currently). Supporting
>> SSPI/GSSAPI and then writing a small document on how to generate
>> Windows keytabs for Postgres would mean single-sign-on for Windows
>> users using applicati
Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Martijn van Oosterhout (kleptog@svana.org) wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:10:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Actually, it's *not* feature-complete even yet.
>> What's missing? I don't see anything on the TODO list relating to
>> this. If you wanted a GnuTLS patch that
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:12:47PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > We use it on some of our production systems (since it can
> > > provide cracklib, password expiration, etc, and the postgres
> > > instance inside it's own vserver so it doesn't hurt
* Martijn van Oosterhout (kleptog@svana.org) wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:10:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Actually, it's *not* feature-complete even yet.
>
> What's missing? I don't see anything on the TODO list relating to
> this. If you wanted a GnuTLS patch that supported more feature
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Keep in mind it took years to get OpenSSL support up to the level we
> > have it now. It took SSL experts coming in and out of our development
> > process to get it 100% feature-complete.
>
> Actually, it's *not
* Andrew Dunstan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Keep in mind it took years to get OpenSSL support up to the level we
> > have it now. It took SSL experts coming in and out of our development
> > process to get it 100% feature-complete. Doing this for another
> > library, I
* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > given options like --enable-dtrace and --with-libedit-preferred, I don't
> > find
> > this argument compelling...
>
> Keep in mind it took years to get OpenSSL support up to the level we
> have it now. It took SSL experts comi
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:10:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Keep in mind it took years to get OpenSSL support up to the level we
> > have it now. It took SSL experts coming in and out of our development
> > process to get it 100% feature-complete.
>
>
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Knut P. Lehre wrote:
Installing postgresql 8.2.0 on Windows XP Pro SP2 using the msi
installer dated 2006-12-04, with libeay32.dll and ssleay32.dll (both
dated 2005-07-06) (and libiconv-2.dll, libintl-2.dll, and libpq.dll)
from a previous installation (of version 8.0.5) al
56 matches
Mail list logo
