Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks. Now, we have some more warnings/errors:
> http://www.gunduz.org/postgresql/postgres-A4.log.gz
You need bigger TeX settings. Please read "Building the Documentation".
regards, tom lane
--
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 18:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Those are the same version numbers I see in Fedora 6, which doesn't
> behave like that ... Anyway, I've committed some cleanup in HEAD.
Thanks. Now, we have some more warnings/errors:
http://www.gunduz.org/postgresql/postgres-A4.log.gz
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmph. What version of the SGML tools are you using? It seems more
>> prone to get confused by non-entity-ized '<' and '>' than what the
>> rest of us are using.
> I'm not totally au fait with the rules of SGML. Does it allow literal
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 17:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmph. What version of the SGML tools are you using?
> The ones supplied with Fedora 8.
> sgml-common: 0.6.3
> openjada: 1.3.2
Those are the same version numbers I see in Fedo
Tom Lane wrote:
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I got some SGML errors:
https://devrim.privatepaste.com/501oMnwCYw
Hmph. What version of the SGML tools are you using? It seems more
prone to get confused by non-entity-ized '<' and '>' than what the
res
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 17:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I got some SGML errors:
> > https://devrim.privatepaste.com/501oMnwCYw
>
> Hmph. What version of the SGML tools are you using?
The ones supplied with Fedora 8.
sgml-common: 0.6.3
openjada: 1.3.2
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE
Pos
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 20:40 +, Gregory Stark wrote:
> I'm not sure where the idea of keeping the current bounds of the input tapes
> comes into it. We only preread when we run out of tuples anyways and then we
> don't really have a choice about which tape we want to preread from. And it's
> a g
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I got some SGML errors:
> https://devrim.privatepaste.com/501oMnwCYw
Hmph. What version of the SGML tools are you using? It seems more
prone to get confused by non-entity-ized '<' and '>' than what the
rest of us are using.
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 18:33 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> No, the reason for that error message is that it is trying to generate
> postgres.pdf from postgres.gif. Try "make postgres-A4.pdf" or
> postgres-US.pdf instead.
Oh, thanks :)
I got some SGML errors:
https://devrim.privatepaste.com
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 20:40 +, Gregory Stark wrote:
> So the question is just how many seeks are we doing during sorting. If we're
> doing 0.1% seeks and 99.9% sequential i/o then eliminating the 1% entirely
> (which we can't do) isn't going to speed up seeking all that much. If we're
> doing 2
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The buffer size at max tapes is an optimum - a trade off between
> avoiding intermediate merging and merging efficiently. Freeing more
> memory is definitely going to help in the case of low work_mem and lots
> of runs.
I can't follow these abstract arg
Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to run make postgres.pdf (PostgreSQL 8.3beta4), and got this
> error:
>
> cp ./../graphics/postgres.gif .
> cp: cannot stat `./../graphics/postgres.gif': No such file or directory
> make: *** [postgres.gif] Error 1
No, the reason for that error message is t
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 20:40 +, Gregory Stark wrote:
> I think the way to do what you're proposing is...
Don't understand that. Algorithm F covers that already doesn't it?
> So the question is just how many seeks are we doing during sorting. If we're
> doing 0.1% seeks and 99.9% sequential i/
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
I tried to run make postgres.pdf (PostgreSQL 8.3beta4), and got this
error:
You need to say "make postgres-US.pdf" or -A4. The .gif file is coming
from make's default rules. Perhaps we should provide a real target
matching postgres.pdf and error
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 10:32 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
>
>> If I understand correctly, we just keep track of the maximum value of
>> the last block read from each run, and then always read from the run in
>> which the last block read has the lowest maximu
Hi,
I tried to run make postgres.pdf (PostgreSQL 8.3beta4), and got this
error:
cp ./../graphics/postgres.gif .
cp: cannot stat `./../graphics/postgres.gif': No such file or directory
make: *** [postgres.gif] Error 1
CVS/tarball does not include this file, and I think we should add.
Regards,
--
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 10:32 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> If I understand correctly, we just keep track of the maximum value of
> the last block read from each run, and then always read from the run in
> which the last block read has the lowest maximum.
Yep, sounds like Algorithm F
> It seems as if
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 12:15 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > When you redid the msvc build stuff you seem to have missed the
> > documentatino.. Specifically, I notice that buildenv.pl isn't documented -
> > docs still say buildenv.bat is the way to go.
> >
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 11:51 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> So Algorithm F is somewhat orthogonal to what I've proposed, though
> maybe still interesting. What we do now is fairly close, but you should
> look at the code in tuplesort.c and logtape.c to see how well it
> matches. That might lead to an i
There's a suspicious ifdef in pg_standby for WIN32 which smells like a kludge
added to work around a Windows problem which makes it work but at great
expense:
#ifdef WIN32
/*
* Windows reports that the file has the right number of bytes
* even tho
Andrew,
As to how it was built: I was under the impression that the 8.3 release
is build using MSVSC?
I was keen to give it a try to see if this version would work more
optimally on windows as the pg instance (8.2.5) I run normally suffers
from serious high pages/sec (by looking at perfmon on wi
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Hi!
When you redid the msvc build stuff you seem to have missed the
documentatino.. Specifically, I notice that buildenv.pl isn't documented -
docs still say buildenv.bat is the way to go.
Also, do we now have both buildenv.bat and buildenv.pl? (I have them both
in my e
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Did we ever come to a conclusion on what to do with integer datetimes on
>>> msvc for 8.3?
>>>
>>> For the uninformed - 8.2 and earlier had the binary build with floating
>>> point timestamps, 8.3 has integer timestamps
From the postgresql ftp server. I initially wanted to download beta3,
but spotted beta4 so I gave that a go
ftp.postgresql.org
/pub/binary/v8.3beta4/win32/
~ Filip
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 December 2007 17:09
To: Filip Wuytack
Cc: pgsq
Filip Wuytack wrote:
Hi,
I loaded pg8.3 beta 4 on a win2k3 64bit box (8GB ram). I was able to
restore a database into it (about 30GB,5schemas and about 2000 tables)
but whenever I try to open the tables in pgadmin3, the database crashes
(i've tried with both the default postgresql.conf file an
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Did we ever come to a conclusion on what to do with integer datetimes on
>> msvc for 8.3?
>>
>> For the uninformed - 8.2 and earlier had the binary build with floating
>> point timestamps, 8.3 has integer timestamps. (We're just talking the
>>
On Dec 3, 2007, at 11:27 , Tom Lane wrote:
I believe we have consensus that 8.4 is the time to do that --- see
thread here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-05/msg00046.php
Is there anything in the release notes (or elsewhere) for 8.3 that
mention this as the intention, si
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Did we ever come to a conclusion on what to do with integer datetimes on
msvc for 8.3?
For the uninformed - 8.2 and earlier had the binary build with floating
point timestamps, 8.3 has integer timestamps. (We're just talking the
binary build here)
If you are prepa
Hi,
I loaded pg8.3 beta 4 on a win2k3 64bit box (8GB ram). I was able to
restore a database into it (about 30GB,5schemas and about 2000 tables)
but whenever I try to open the tables in pgadmin3, the database crashes
(i've tried with both the default postgresql.conf file and with some
more tuned on
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did we ever come to a conclusion on what to do with integer datetimes on
> msvc for 8.3?
> For the uninformed - 8.2 and earlier had the binary build with floating
> point timestamps, 8.3 has integer timestamps. (We're just talking the
> binary build he
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:52:15AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > When you redid the msvc build stuff you seem to have missed the
> > documentatino.. Specifically, I notice that buildenv.pl isn't documented -
> > docs still say buildenv.bat is the way to go
Did we ever come to a conclusion on what to do with integer datetimes on
msvc for 8.3?
For the uninformed - 8.2 and earlier had the binary build with floating
point timestamps, 8.3 has integer timestamps. (We're just talking the
binary build here)
//Magnus
---(end of broa
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When you redid the msvc build stuff you seem to have missed the
> documentatino.. Specifically, I notice that buildenv.pl isn't documented -
> docs still say buildenv.bat is the way to go.
On a related note, I was wondering yesterday if there are any o
Hello
On 03/12/2007, Dragan Zubac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> What I have noticed is that when I don't use procedure
> at all,there's only 2-5 locks in pg_locks,after I
> start application which uses stored procedure the
> number in pg_locks increase rapidly to steady 75 even
> to 130 a
cinu wrote:
> GNUmakefile:15: ../../../src/Makefile.global: No such
> file or directory
> GNUmakefile:78: /src/Makefile.shlib: No such file or
> directory
> gmake: *** No rule to make target
> `/src/Makefile.shlib'. Stop.
You need to run "configure" first (found in the top-level directory), so
t
Hello
What I have noticed is that when I don't use procedure
at all,there's only 2-5 locks in pg_locks,after I
start application which uses stored procedure the
number in pg_locks increase rapidly to steady 75 even
to 130 at certain moments.
Any clue why procedure usage might increase locks so
he
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 12:07 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 18:03 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > 5. DYNAMIC RUN HANDLING (in Final Merge)
> >
> > Another way of addressing a) is to simply make better use of memory
> > itself. Let's look at that in more detail:
> >
> > Number of r
Hi All,
I am trying to do a regression testing on the version
installed.
Now on the installed version of postgreSQL-8.2.4 with
the service started, and at the regress filder, I run
the command "gmake installcheck", when I run this
command I get the following message:
GNUmakefile:15: ../../../
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When you redid the msvc build stuff you seem to have missed the
> documentatino.. Specifically, I notice that buildenv.pl isn't documented -
> docs still say buildenv.bat is the way to go.
>
> Also, do we now have both buildenv.bat and buildenv.pl? (I have them bo
Hi!
When you redid the msvc build stuff you seem to have missed the
documentatino.. Specifically, I notice that buildenv.pl isn't documented -
docs still say buildenv.bat is the way to go.
Also, do we now have both buildenv.bat and buildenv.pl? (I have them both
in my environment, but that could
Tom Lane wrote:
It is also pretty well established that if pltcl or plperl cause the
backend to become multithreaded, things break horribly. I strongly
Isn't that something that needs to be fixed? Its one thing not to allow
for multiple threads to
be in your code, but not having a threaded
41 matches
Mail list logo
