On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 17:01 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Decibel! wrote:
For that matter, it'd be better if you could just get all 3 files (pre,
data, post) in one shot with one transaction; that would guarantee you a
clean dump.
+1.
OK, that seems possible.
What do you think the
Manolo _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to store the address on tape of the first and the last tuple
for the run I'm currently creating on a specific tape.
I need it in order to access directly to those two tuples right after
terminating the creation of that specific run.
Why don't
On Feb 11, 2008 9:14 PM, Andy Colson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont think the buildfarm needs to require CVS. The code can be
changed in the buildfarm to just run 'svn up' or 'git up and go' (sorry,
never used git so I had to guess at the command :-) ) right?
The relevant commands, for
On Saturday 09 February 2008 22:51, Christopher Browne wrote:
On Feb 9, 2008 4:58 PM, Jan Wieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if the efforts to provide mirrors for many different systems can
hurt later down the road. It is pretty obvious that amost every current
system has options to
Robert Treat wrote:
On Saturday 09 February 2008 22:51, Christopher Browne wrote:
On Feb 9, 2008 4:58 PM, Jan Wieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if the efforts to provide mirrors for many different systems can
hurt later down the road. It is pretty obvious that amost every current
system
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 11:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think this is pretty unwieldy.
I agree. Since any multiple-output-file case can't usefully use stdout,
I think we should combine the switches and just have one switch that
says
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
--pre-schema-file = foo
--data-file = bar
--post-schema-file = baz
this looks good. But arguably it's really pre-data and post-data.
pre-schema would be something that comes before the schema, no? Or maybe
it should be
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think this is pretty unwieldy.
I agree. Since any multiple-output-file case can't usefully use stdout,
I think we should combine the switches and just have one switch that
says both that you want separated output and what
There are also some compatibility concerns involved. If we add
grantable privileges for TRUNCATE and/or DDL operations, then GRANT ALL
ON TABLE suddenly conveys a whole lot more privilege than it did before.
This could lead to unpleasant surprises in security-sensitive
operations. One could
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 18:15 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Simon, are you planning to do this? (assuming everybody agrees on the
syntax)
Yes, will do.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7:
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 10:29 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
--multidump-prefix=foobar
and it creates foobar.1.predata, foobar.2.data, foobar.3.postdata
or something like that? The number would help to sort them
appropriately, and the string
Andy Colson wrote:
Would a pre-requisite for any new SCM to be anointed as *the* new SCM
that the buildfarm can be reconfigured to run with it? Unless there
is an SCM2CVS option available I suppose... how many SCM's support
such a thing?
I dont think the buildfarm needs to require CVS.
Andy Colson wrote:
Robert Treat wrote:
Would a pre-requisite for any new SCM to be anointed as *the* new SCM
that the buildfarm can be reconfigured to run with it? Unless there
is an SCM2CVS option available I suppose... how many SCM's support
such a thing?
I dont think the buildfarm needs
Hello Everybody,
I am trying to change a oracle function to postgreSQL. I have to use the
function parameter in different query so i need to use alias command.
but i am not able to use this alias in from clause of select statment.
could anybody please let me know how can i use it in from
Hi,
In 8.3.0 (windows installation) if I execute this command i get an
error while in 8.2 i get a psql command prompt, is this a change in
behaviour or a bug?
H:\Archivos de programa\PostgreSQL\8.3\binpsql template1 -U postgres
psql: warning: extra command-line argument postgres ignored
Password
Andy Colson escribió:
Robert Treat wrote:
Would a pre-requisite for any new SCM to be anointed as *the* new SCM
that the buildfarm can be reconfigured to run with it? Unless there is
an SCM2CVS option available I suppose... how many SCM's support such a
thing?
I dont think the
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 17:10 +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
Simon wrote:
My proposal is to provide two additional modes:
--schema-pre-load corresponding to (1) above
--schema-post-load corresponding to (3) above
Sounds nice.
For a large schema we might rather want one switch
Hi.
I would like to store the address on tape of the first and the last tuple for
the run I'm currently creating on a specific tape.
I need it in order to access directly to those two tuples right after
terminating the creation of that specific run.
Of course I could store that address of
On Monday 11 February 2008 18:18, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Andy Colson wrote:
Would a pre-requisite for any new SCM to be anointed as *the* new SCM
that the buildfarm can be reconfigured to run with it? Unless there
is an SCM2CVS option available I suppose... how many SCM's support
such a
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 10:29 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
--multidump-prefix=foobar
and it creates foobar.1.predata, foobar.2.data, foobar.3.postdata
or something like that? The number would help to sort them
appropriately, and the string would ensure that you
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
--multidump-prefix=foobar
and it creates foobar.1.predata, foobar.2.data, foobar.3.postdata
or something like that? The number would help to sort them
appropriately, and the string would ensure that you know what each file
is ... perhaps we could have %-escapes in the
Though to be safe you should be quoting MT and ST with quote_ident()
before putting them into a dynamic statement.
Cheers
BJ
On Feb 12, 2008 4:38 PM, Brett McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you could do this with 'execute' like so:
execute 'select count(*) into count1 from ' || MT || ',' ||
you could do this with 'execute' like so:
execute 'select count(*) into count1 from ' || MT || ',' || ST || '
where ' || MT || '.phonenumber= ' || ST || '.phonenumber' into v_variable;
brett
Amit jain wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I am trying to change a oracle function to postgreSQL. I have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:09:45PM -0600, Decibel! wrote:
On Feb 9, 2008, at 1:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Let's not swat flies with steam hammers.
What the heck is a steam hammer? :P
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creusot_steam_hammer
The
Thanks for your reply.
I need to read all the run in order to move it to another tape. I suppose the
only way to make it is reading the run tuple by tuple and writing them into the
destination tape.
Regards, Manolo.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:
On Feb 11, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Christopher Browne wrote:
It seems better to me to have a suffix that suggests some sort of
meaning. I'm not sure of the ideal names, but starting with:
.pre-schema, .data, and .post-schema as possibilities seems like a
route to get to possibly-better names...
On Feb 9, 2008, at 1:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Let's not swat flies with steam hammers.
What the heck is a steam hammer? :P
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
On Feb 11, 2008 3:41 PM, Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 10:29 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
--multidump-prefix=foobar
and it creates foobar.1.predata, foobar.2.data, foobar.3.postdata
or something like that? The number would help
Simon Riggs wrote:
What do you think the syntax should be for that?
If you specify --data-only you get 1 file
If you specify --schema-only you get either 1 or 2 files
and if you don't specify either you get either 1 or 3 files
How do we name the files?
--pre-schema-file
--data-file
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think this is pretty unwieldy.
I agree. Since any multiple-output-file case can't usefully use stdout,
I think we should combine the switches and just have one switch that
says both that you want separated output and what the target filename
is. Thus
Jaime Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In 8.3.0 (windows installation) if I execute this command i get an
error while in 8.2 i get a psql command prompt, is this a change in
behaviour or a bug?
H:\Archivos de programa\PostgreSQL\8.3\binpsql template1 -U postgres
psql: warning: extra
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 11:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think this is pretty unwieldy.
I agree. Since any multiple-output-file case can't usefully use stdout,
I think we should combine the switches and just have one switch that
says both that you want
32 matches
Mail list logo
