On 03/09/10 03:34, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
wrote:
What weirdness, exactly, are you discussing now? I've lost track of
which problem(s) are still unresolved.
Lots of commits that look like this:
commit
Updating the patch with emitting parttoken and registering it with
snowball config.
-Sushant.
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 09:44 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Sushant Sinha sushant...@gmail.com wrote:
I have attached a patch that emits parts of a host token, a url token,
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, the other big missing feature for HS is the
ability to promote standbys to become the new master.
Absolutely. Users often express disappointment when they know
a new base backup required after fail
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:19 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Peter muttered something about doing that this week.
The major blocker is preparing the release notes. If someone has time
for that ...
Peter, do you have a time estimation about this?
I'd like to build 9.1 alpha1 RPMs before we
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com wrote:
and the result is that things are looking pretty clean :-)
Hey, that's great. But I wonder why Magnus got a different result.
Can you post the repo you ended up with somewhere?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB:
On 04/09/10 12:24, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com wrote:
and the result is that things are looking pretty clean :-)
Hey, that's great. But I wonder why Magnus got a different result.
This is the first time I've posted these incantations for
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
I noticed in postgres you cannot return multiple result sets from a
stored procedure (surprisingly as it looks like a very good dbms).
That feature has been on the TODO list for years. However, nobody has
stepped forward
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout
klep...@svana.org wrote:
rsync is not rocket science. All you need is for the receiving end to
send a checksum for each block it has. The server side does the same
checksum and for each block sends back same or new data.
Well rsync is
On 4 September 2010 14:42, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
The industry standard solution that we're missing that we *should* be
figuring out how to implement is incremental backups.
I'll buy you a crate of beer if this gets implemented... although
you're in Dublin so would be like buying
2010/9/4 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
I noticed in postgres you cannot return multiple result sets from a
stored procedure (surprisingly as it looks like a very good dbms).
That feature has been on the TODO list for
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Also as mentioned upthread there are effective workarounds if you poke
around a bit. This is a FAQ, and there are about 3-4 solid methods
(if you search the archives) that cover most problems you would be
looking at
2010/9/4 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also as mentioned upthread there are effective workarounds if you poke
around a bit. This is a FAQ, and there are about 3-4 solid methods
(if you search the archives)
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
I am looking on ToDo topic - Allow handling of %TYPE arrays, e.g.
tab.col%TYPE[]
Some the most simple solution can be enhancing regtype to support this
syntax
I'm not really in favor of adding a wart like that to regtype, and
I don't see how it
Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com writes:
I think we should start a git repository somewhere containing the
precise conversion recipe - i.e.:
* cvs2git options file
* cvs2git invocation command line
* all scripts that massage the CVS repository before conversion, or the
Git repository afterwards
2010/9/4 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
I am looking on ToDo topic - Allow handling of %TYPE arrays, e.g.
tab.col%TYPE[]
Some the most simple solution can be enhancing regtype to support this
syntax
I'm not really in favor of adding a wart like
Alpha1 has been bundled and is available at
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/alpha/
Please check that it is sane.
If there are no concerns, I will move them to the FTP site tomorrow
(Sunday) and send out announcements on Monday.
If someone wants to volunteer to craft a brief release
Announcing on Monday doesn't give us any time to build installers.
On 9/4/10, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Alpha1 has been bundled and is available at
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/alpha/
Please check that it is sane.
If there are no concerns, I will move them to the
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I certainly hope that pg_regress isn't freeing the strings it passes
to putenv() ...
pg_regress does not restore these settings (it says with C/English) so
the code is different.
That's not what I'm on about.
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
Announcing on Monday doesn't give us any time to build installers.
Also, Monday is a major holiday in the US. Tuesday or Wednesday might
be more sensible.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
I wrote:
I tried this on a PPC Mac running 10.4.11, which is the oldest Mac OS
I have handy at the moment. It worked fine. The existing coding in
ps_status.c dates from late 2001, which means that it was first tested
against OS X 10.1, and most likely we have not rechecked the question
of
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Maybe the lexer isn't the right place to fix this. The problem here
(or so I gather) is that if I say foo(1), then 1 is an integer and
we'll do an implicit cast to bigint, real,
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com wrote:
and the result is that things are looking pretty clean :-)
Hey, that's great. But I wonder why Magnus got a different result.
This is the first time I've posted these incantations for excising the
unwanted history, so he would
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
*However* I tihnk you're all headed in the wrong direction here. I
don't think rsync is what anyone should be doing with their backups at
all. It still requires scanning through *all* your data even if you've
only changed a
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I am not too sure that the distinction between implicit casts and
assignment casts is all that useful;
We've been there and done that; it doesn't work. The current scheme
was invented specifically because a two-way design didn't work.
24 matches
Mail list logo
