Greg Stark writes:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> Facts are not subject to copyright but compilations can be.
> I know it's popular for engineers to play lawyer and I've been guilty
> of it on many an occasion. But in this case I think you're all *way*
> oversimplify
Robert Haas writes:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I would just fix it in head.
> That just seems weird. Either it's cheap enough not to matter (in
> which case there's no reason to revert that change at all) or it's
> expensive enough to matter (in which case presuma
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
>
> All that said I think this is far murkier than you all seem to think.
> Copyright law is one of the most complex areas of the law and this is
> one of the least well defined parts of copyright law.
>
imposing no natural restrictions have that
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
> This is a little patch to fix a typo in docs. In the length function
> should be a space between "string" and "bytea".
Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via p
Hi Alex,
I guess we both are in agreement with each other :)
After sleeping over it, I think that check is indeed dead code with this new
non-inheritable check constraints functionality in place. So unless you have
some other comments, we can mark this as 'Ready for Commiter'.
Again, thanks for
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> On 7 October 2011 21:27, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
It seems pretty baseless to me: you can't copyright a collection of
facts. I think we should do nothing pending a court decision.
>>
>> The one interesting case t
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > Robert Haas wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Robert Haas wrote:
>> >> >> The funny thing is that I've been think
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
> >> wrote:
> >> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> >> The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months
> >> >> about how convenient it is tha
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 1. The way that nodeIndexscan.c builds up the faux heap tuple is
>> perhaps susceptible to improvement. I thought about building a
>> virtual tuple, but then what do I do with an OID column, if I have
>> one? Or maybe this should be done some ot
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
>> wrote:
>> > Robert Haas wrote:
>> >> The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months
>> >> about how convenient it is that we defined WAL_DEBUG in debug
>
Robert Haas writes:
> Please find attached a patch implementing a basic version of
> index-only scans. This patch is the work of my colleague Ibrar Ahmed
> and myself, and also incorporates some code from previous patches
> posted by Heikki Linnakanagas.
I've committed this after some rather sub
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 07:16:33PM +0200, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> My preference is still also WITH(security_barrier=...) syntax.
>
> The arguable point was the behavior when a view is replaced without
> explicit WITH clause;
> whether we should consider it was specified a default value, or we
> shou
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Mark Mielke wrote:
> My original read of the problem determined (for me personally) that the only
> way one could be in violation of copyright was if the data was incorrect
> (i.e. not factual). It presented an interesting contradiction. The only way
> they could su
My original read of the problem determined (for me personally) that the
only way one could be in violation of copyright was if the data was
incorrect (i.e. not factual). It presented an interesting contradiction.
The only way they could sue is by agreeing that their data is faulty and
should no
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 21:27, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> It seems pretty baseless to me: you can't copyright a collection of
>>> facts. I think we should do nothing pending a court decision.
>>
>> Agreed. I am just pointing ou
On 7 October 2011 21:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> Andrea Suisani wrote:
>>> Speaking of Olson tz database, I've just stumbled across this post
>>> and I thought it would be worthy to report it here:
>>> http://blog.joda.org/2011/10/today-time-zone-database-was-closed.html
>
>> I
On 7 October 2011 21:27, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It seems pretty baseless to me: you can't copyright a collection of
>> facts. I think we should do nothing pending a court decision.
>
> Agreed. I am just pointing out the possible exposure.
The one interesting case that I can r
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Andrea Suisani wrote:
> >> Speaking of Olson tz database, I've just stumbled across this post
> >> and I thought it would be worthy to report it here:
> >> http://blog.joda.org/2011/10/today-time-zone-database-was-closed.html
>
> > I suppose there is no
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Andrea Suisani wrote:
>> Speaking of Olson tz database, I've just stumbled across this post
>> and I thought it would be worthy to report it here:
>> http://blog.joda.org/2011/10/today-time-zone-database-was-closed.html
> I suppose there is nothing stopping them from attac
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months
> >> about how convenient it is that we defined WAL_DEBUG in debug
> >> builds
> >
> > IMO, --enable-debug should not do anything
Andrea Suisani wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 07:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > daveg writes:
> >> Postgresql 9.0.4 has the timezone:
> >>America/Blanc-Sablon
> >> However other sources seem to spell this with an underscore instead of
> >> dash:
> >>America/Blanc_Sablon
> >
> > I don't know what "oth
Robert Haas writes:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm making some progress with this, but I notice what seems like a
>> missing feature: there needs to be a way to turn it off. Otherwise
>> performance comparisons will be difficult to impossible.
>>
>> The most obvious so
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> Please find attached a patch implementing a basic version of
>> index-only scans.
>
> I'm making some progress with this, but I notice what seems like a
> missing feature: there needs to be a way to turn it off. Otherwise
>
On 10/07/2011 11:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas writes:
Please find attached a patch implementing a basic version of
index-only scans.
I'm making some progress with this, but I notice what seems like a
missing feature: there needs to be a way to turn it off. Otherwise
performance compar
Robert Haas writes:
> Please find attached a patch implementing a basic version of
> index-only scans.
I'm making some progress with this, but I notice what seems like a
missing feature: there needs to be a way to turn it off. Otherwise
performance comparisons will be difficult to impossible.
T
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I will now work on pg_upgrade to also use the new flag to find the data
> > directory from a config-only install. However, this is only available
> > in PG 9.2, and it will only be in PG 9.3 that you can hope to use this
> > feature (if old is PG 9.2
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> There is not possible to get a number of processed rows when COPY
> is evaluated via SPI. Client can use a tag, but SPI doesn't use a
> tag.
>
> I propose a small change a ProcessUtility to return a processed
> rows.
Please add this to the open CommitFest:
https://com
Hello all,
This is a little patch to fix a typo in docs. In the length function
should be a space between "string" and "bytea".
Best regards,
--
Dickson S. Guedes
mail/xmpp: gue...@guedesoft.net - skype: guediz
http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sg
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months
>> about how convenient it is that we defined WAL_DEBUG in debug
>> builds
>
> IMO, --enable-debug should not do anything but include debugging
> symbols.
Robert Haas wrote:
> The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months
> about how convenient it is that we defined WAL_DEBUG in debug
> builds
IMO, --enable-debug should not do anything but include debugging
symbols. The ability to get a useful stack trace from a production
cras
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 20:36, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 08:18, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Amit Khandekar
>>> wrote:
I have no more issues with the patch.
Thanks!
>>>
>>> I think this
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 09:50, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>> My only thought is
>> perhaps we should add that missing unique index on (conrelid,
>> conname). If we are not going to support duplicate names in the code,
>> we might as well enforce it.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Usama Dar wrote:
> Hi Hackers,
> I have a strange problem, or maybe it's not a strange problem but just
> something wrong with my understanding i have SIP router which works with
> postgresql using libpq, somewhere in the code it inserts a row in the
> database and
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
wrote:
> Thank you for reviewing.
>
> The new version of this patch is attached to this message.
OK, I think this is reasonably close to being committable now. There
are a few remaining style and grammar mistakes but I can fix those up
before co
2011年10月4日12:08 Shigeru Hanada :
>> In my opinion, FdwRoutine should have an additional API to inform the core
>> its
>> supported features; such as inner-join, outer-join, order-by,
>> group-by, aggregate
>> functions, insert, update, delete, etc... in the future version.
>
> Sure, so in my desig
Hi Hackers,
I have a strange problem, or maybe it's not a strange problem but just
something wrong with my understanding i have SIP router which works with
postgresql using libpq, somewhere in the code it inserts a row in the
database and then when the insert is finished it invokes another module
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 07:53, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> The only way we could
>> trip up in that case is if there were two identically named
>> constraints. We'd have to visit the first tuple, update it, then
>> visit the second tuple, recurs
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 07:53, Robert Haas wrote:
> The only way we could
> trip up in that case is if there were two identically named
> constraints. We'd have to visit the first tuple, update it, then
> visit the second tuple, recurse (thus incrementing the command
> counter), and then visit th
Hi,
Here's a patch to allow TOAST tables to be moved to a different
tablespace. This item has been picked up from the TODO list.
Main idea is to consider that a TOAST table can have its own tablespace.
Regards,
--
JT
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_tabl
On 2011-10-07 12:21, Yeb Havinga wrote:
On 2011-10-06 16:04, Royce Ausburn wrote:
Initial Review for patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-09/msg00744.php
Again, thank you very much for your thorough review. I'll update the
patch so mixing positional and named parameters
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> I found that by default WAL_DEBUG macro has been defined in
> 9.2dev and 9.1. I'm very surprised at this. Why does WAL_DEBUG
> need to be defined by default? The performance overhead
> introduced by WAL_DEBUG is really vanishingly low?
>
> WAL_D
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>> Oh, I see the problem, and I now agree that it's the DROP CONSTRAINT
>> code that is buggy.
>
> Want me to roll this fix in as part of the alter table only constraint
> patch? Or keep it split out? We might want to backpatch to at least
> 8.
,--- You/Merlin (Fri, 7 Oct 2011 07:39:57 -0500) *
| On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Alex Goncharov
| > ,--- Merlin Moncure (Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:28:56 -0500) *
| > | hm, good point. not sure how it's useful though. I suppose an
| > | application could leverage that for validation purposes,
,--- Peter Eisentraut (Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:14:09 +0300) *
| On tor, 2011-10-06 at 20:15 -0400, Alex Goncharov wrote:
| > P.S. And on the odd chance that somebody thinks that this
| > functionality would be possible and helpful to add to libpq, and
| > the problem is in the lack of hum
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:09:44PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm very sorry for the late reply.
>
> (2011/09/21 10:00), Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Excerpts from David Fetter's message of mar sep 20 21:22:32 -0300 2011:
> >>On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
>
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Alex Goncharov
wrote:
> ,--- I/Alex (Thu, 06 Oct 2011 14:02:14 -0400) *
> | My understanding is that libpq does not allow one to find if a result
> | set column is nullable.
> ,--- You/Merlin (Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:16:18 -0500) *
> | why aren't you using PQgeti
Hi,
I'm very sorry for the late reply.
(2011/09/21 10:00), Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from David Fetter's message of mar sep 20 21:22:32 -0300 2011:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Probably a more interesting question is why we wouldn't change
autovacuum so tha
On 07.10.2011 12:19, Fujii Masao wrote:
Hi,
I found that by default WAL_DEBUG macro has been defined in
9.2dev and 9.1. I'm very surprised at this. Why does WAL_DEBUG
need to be defined by default? The performance overhead
introduced by WAL_DEBUG is really vanishingly low?
WAL_DEBUG was defined
On 2011-10-06 16:04, Royce Ausburn wrote:
Initial Review for patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-09/msg00744.php
Hello Royce,
Thank you for your review.
I don't think so. The new feature accepts opening a cursor with some
parameter names not specified:
open c
Hi,
I found that by default WAL_DEBUG macro has been defined in
9.2dev and 9.1. I'm very surprised at this. Why does WAL_DEBUG
need to be defined by default? The performance overhead
introduced by WAL_DEBUG is really vanishingly low?
WAL_DEBUG was defined in the following commit:
53dbc27c62d8e1b6
Hi Hanada-san,
I'm very sorry for late reply.
(2011/09/20 18:49), Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> I took a look at the patch, and found that it couldn't be applied
> cleanly against HEAD. Please rebase your patch against current HEAD of
> master branch, rather than 9.1beta1.
>
> The wiki pages below wo
On 10/05/2011 07:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
daveg writes:
Postgresql 9.0.4 has the timezone:
America/Blanc-Sablon
However other sources seem to spell this with an underscore instead of dash:
America/Blanc_Sablon
I don't know what "other sources" you're consulting, but "Blanc-Sablon"
is the
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> I'd prefer to include it in the initial patch. If the current GiST code
> is going to be replaced, then there's not much sense reviewing/testing
> it.
>
> You may need to consider unbounded and empty ranges specially. I made an
> attempt to do s
On tor, 2011-10-06 at 20:15 -0400, Alex Goncharov wrote:
> P.S. And on the odd chance that somebody thinks that this
> functionality would be possible and helpful to add to libpq, and
> the problem is in the lack of human resources: I would be more
> then happy to dig into some Postg
54 matches
Mail list logo
