Re: [HACKERS] logical changeset generation v3

2012-11-21 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.comwrote: On 2012-11-21 14:57:08 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: Ah, I see. Could you try the following diff? diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c index

Re: [HACKERS] FDW for PostgreSQL

2012-11-21 Thread Kohei KaiGai
2012/11/21 Shigeru Hanada shigeru.han...@gmail.com: Thank for the comment! On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote: I also think the new use_remote_explain option is good. It works fine when we try to use this fdw over the network with latency more or less.

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review]

2012-11-21 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
2012-11-20 20:32 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta: 2012-11-20 17:03 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta: 2012-11-18 17:20 keltezéssel, Magnus Hagander írta: Much of the tar stuff is very similar (I haven't looked to see if it's identical) to the stuff in backend/replication/basebackup.c.

Re: [HACKERS] Suggestion for --truncate-tables to pg_restore

2012-11-21 Thread Karl O. Pinc
Hi Josh, On 11/20/2012 11:53:23 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote: Hi Karl, I signed on to review this patch for the current CF. I noticed. Thanks very much. On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Karl O. Pinc k...@meme.com wrote: On 09/20/2012 12:24:49 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: First, the problem:

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] binary heap implementation

2012-11-21 Thread Andres Freund
On 2012-11-20 22:55:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com writes: While I'm thinking about it, why are the fields of a binaryheap_node called key and value? That implies a semantics not actually used here. Maybe value1 and value2 instead? Yes, I discussed

[HACKERS] Fwd: ERROR: volatile EquivalenceClass has no sortref

2012-11-21 Thread Ranjeet Dhumal
Hi All , When am trying to query a table temp_table1(sms_type varchar(20),sms_info varchar(100),sms_id integer) Query :: select sms_type,count(*) from temp_table1 group by 1 order by 2 desc; Then i got following errors , i dont know whats wrong in this . *ERROR: volatile EquivalenceClass has no

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review]

2012-11-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: The problem is that it calls pg_malloc() which is an executable-specific function. Some of the bin/* executables define it as calling exit(1) when malloc() returns NULL, some call it with exit(EXIT_FAILURE) which happens to be 1 but still can be different from the

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review]

2012-11-21 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
2012-11-21 14:19 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta: Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: The problem is that it calls pg_malloc() which is an executable-specific function. Some of the bin/* executables define it as calling exit(1) when malloc() returns NULL, some call it with exit(EXIT_FAILURE) which

Re: [HACKERS] review: Reduce palloc's in numeric operations

2012-11-21 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 20.11.2012 21:44, Tom Lane wrote: init_var_from_num's header comment could use some more work. The statement that one must not modify the returned var is false in some sense, since for instance numeric_ceil() does that. The key is that you have to replace the digit buffer not modify it

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review]

2012-11-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: 2012-11-21 14:19 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta: Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: The problem is that it calls pg_malloc() which is an executable-specific function. Some of the bin/* executables define it as calling exit(1) when malloc() returns NULL, some call it with

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review]

2012-11-21 Thread Tom Lane
Boszormenyi Zoltan z...@cybertec.at writes: pg_basebackup needs pg_malloc() to call disconnect_and_exit(1) instead to quit cleanly and not leave an unexpected EOF from client message in the server log. Which is a macro at the moment, but has to be turned into a real function for the reasons

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review]

2012-11-21 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
2012-11-21 15:29 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta: Boszormenyi Zoltan z...@cybertec.at writes: pg_basebackup needs pg_malloc() to call disconnect_and_exit(1) instead to quit cleanly and not leave an unexpected EOF from client message in the server log. Which is a macro at the moment, but has to be

Re: [HACKERS] MySQL search query is not executing in Postgres DB

2012-11-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 10:57 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: But, with the attached patch: rhaas=# create function xyz(smallint) returns smallint as $$select $1$$ language sql; CREATE FUNCTION rhaas=# select xyz(5); xyz

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] binary heap implementation

2012-11-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On 2012-11-20 22:55:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com writes: While I'm thinking about it, why are the fields of a binaryheap_node called key and value? That implies a semantics not

Re: [HACKERS] C-function, don't load external dll file

2012-11-21 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Hi, Przemek Lisowski prze...@lisnet.info writes: HOW LOAD DLL AND USE MY EXTERNAL FUNCTION ? You need to declare it in SQL, maybe like this: create function public.transform(text) returns text as '$libdir/fservice', 'transform' language C; See also the LOAD command and the CREATE

Re: [HACKERS] MySQL search query is not executing in Postgres DB

2012-11-21 Thread Simon Riggs
On 29 August 2012 23:39, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: The main downside I can see is that code that used to work is likely to stop working as soon as someone creates a potential overloading situation. Worse, the error message could be pretty confusing, since if you had been

Re: [HACKERS] Database object names and libpq in UTF-8 locale on Windows

2012-11-21 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Given we're calling to_lower() on a single byte in the code referred to, should we even be doing that when we have a multi-byte encoding and the high bit is set? Nobody responded to this, but I'm rather inclined to say we should not. Here's a simple patch to avoid this case. Comments?

Re: [HACKERS] MySQL search query is not executing in Postgres DB

2012-11-21 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes: It would be useful if we issued a NOTICE when an ambiguity is introduced, rather than when using it. I think that's pie in the sky, since whether there is an ambiguity will depend not only on what set of functions exists, but what the caller's

Re: [HACKERS] Database object names and libpq in UTF-8 locale on Windows

2012-11-21 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes: Here's a simple patch to avoid this case. Comments? I'm not sure that's the only place we're doing this ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your

Re: [HACKERS] Database object names and libpq in UTF-8 locale on Windows

2012-11-21 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 11/21/2012 11:11 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes: Here's a simple patch to avoid this case. Comments? I'm not sure that's the only place we're doing this ... Oh, Hmm, darn. Where else do you think we might? cheers andrew --

[HACKERS] PANIC: could not write to log file

2012-11-21 Thread Cyril VELTER
After upgrading a pretty big database (serveral hundred gig) from 8.2 to 9.2 I'm getting some PANIC: could not write to log file messages. Actually I got two of them. One yesterday and one today. * postgres 9.2.1 is running on a windows 2003 server (downloaded the zip archive binaries)

Re: [HACKERS] Database object names and libpq in UTF-8 locale on Windows

2012-11-21 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes: On 11/21/2012 11:11 AM, Tom Lane wrote: I'm not sure that's the only place we're doing this ... Oh, Hmm, darn. Where else do you think we might? Dunno, but grepping for isupper and/or tolower should find any such places.

Re: [HACKERS] PANIC: could not write to log file

2012-11-21 Thread Jeff Janes
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Cyril VELTER cyril.vel...@metadys.com wrote: After upgrading a pretty big database (serveral hundred gig) from 8.2 to 9.2 I'm getting some PANIC: could not write to log file messages. Actually I got two of them. One yesterday and one today. How was the

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] binary heap implementation

2012-11-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: I guess I'll take another whack at it. New version attached. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company binaryheap-rmh2.patch Description: Binary data -- Sent via

Re: [HACKERS] autovacuum stress-testing our system

2012-11-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote: The two main changes are these: (1) The stats file is split into a common db file, containing all the DB Entries, and per-database files with tables/functions. The common file is still called pgstat.stat, the per-db

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] binary heap implementation

2012-11-21 Thread Andres Freund
On 2012-11-21 12:54:30 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: I guess I'll take another whack at it. New version attached. I think the assert in replace_first should be Assert(!binaryheap_empty(heap) heap-has_heap_property);

Re: [HACKERS] Switching timeline over streaming replication

2012-11-21 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 20.11.2012 15:33, Amit Kapila wrote: Defect-2: 1. start primary A 2. start standby B following A 3. start cascade standby C following B. 4. Start another standby D following C. 5. Execute the following commands in the primary A. create table tbl(f int);

[HACKERS] PQconninfo function for libpq

2012-11-21 Thread Magnus Hagander
I'm breaking this out into it's own thread, for my own sanity if nothing else :) And it's an isolated feature after all. I still agree with the previous review at http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1349321071.23971.0.ca...@vanquo.pezone.net about keeping the data in more than one place.

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] binary heap implementation

2012-11-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas escribió: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: I guess I'll take another whack at it. New version attached. The following comments still talk about key and value, thus need an update: + * binaryheap_add_unordered + * + * Adds the given key

[Re] Re: [HACKERS] PANIC: could not write to log file

2012-11-21 Thread Cyril VELTER
On 21/11/12 18:10:12, mailto:jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Cyril VELTER cyril.vel...@metadys.com wrote: After upgrading a pretty big database (serveral hundred gig) from 8.2 to 9.2 I'm getting some PANIC: could not write to log file messages.

Re: [HACKERS] User control over psql error stream

2012-11-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 11/15/12 3:53 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: This patch gives the end user control over psql's error stream. This allows a single psql session to use \o to send both errors and table output to multiple files. Useful when capturing test output, etc. What does this do that cannot in practice be

Re: [HACKERS] add -Wlogical-op to standard compiler options?

2012-11-21 Thread Jeff Janes
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On 11/15/12 9:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: I think it might be worth adding -Wlogical-op to the standard warning options (for supported compilers, determined by configure test). Does

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] binary heap implementation

2012-11-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: The following comments still talk about key and value, thus need an update: Oops. This comment needs updated (s/comparator/compare/, and also add has_heap_property and arg): Fixed. I would suggest to add

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch: Document names of automatically created constraints and indexes

2012-11-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 11:42 -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote: Could ALTER TABLE use an option to drop the primary key constraint? I needed to do that, found it was not obvious, and this lead me to try to improve things. That

[HACKERS] WIP json generation enhancements

2012-11-21 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Here is a WIP patch for enhancements to json generation. First, there is the much_requested json_agg, which will aggregate rows directly to json. So the following will now work: select json_agg(my_table) from mytable; select json_agg(q) from (myquery here) q; One open question

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] binary heap implementation

2012-11-21 Thread Andres Freund
On 2012-11-21 15:09:12 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: The following comments still talk about key and value, thus need an update: Oops. This comment needs updated (s/comparator/compare/, and also add

Re: [HACKERS] array exclusion constraint

2012-11-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Philip Taylor philiptaylo...@yahoo.com wrote: CREATE TABLE foo ( x CHAR(32) PRIMARY KEY, y CHAR(32) NOT NULL, EXCLUDE USING gist ((ARRAY[x, y]) WITH ) ); My first thought was you were going to have better luck with text rather than char(n), but a

Re: [HACKERS] PQconninfo function for libpq

2012-11-21 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
Hi, 2012-11-21 19:19 keltezéssel, Magnus Hagander írta: I'm breaking this out into it's own thread, for my own sanity if nothing else :) And it's an isolated feature after all. I still agree with the previous review at

Re: [HACKERS] PQconninfo function for libpq

2012-11-21 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan z...@cybertec.at wrote: Hi, 2012-11-21 19:19 keltezéssel, Magnus Hagander írta: I'm breaking this out into it's own thread, for my own sanity if nothing else :) And it's an isolated feature after all. I still agree with the previous

Re: [HACKERS] WIP patch for hint bit i/o mitigation

2012-11-21 Thread Greg Smith
On 11/16/12 9:03 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote: Atri ran some quick n dirty tests to see if there were any regressions. He benched a large scan followed by vacuum. So far, results are inconclusive so better testing methodologies will definitely be greatly appreciated. One of the challenges with

Re: [HACKERS] StrategyGetBuffer questions

2012-11-21 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote: In this sprawling thread on scaling issues [1], the topic meandered into StrategyGetBuffer() -- in particular the clock sweep loop. I'm wondering:

Re: [HACKERS] MySQL search query is not executing in Postgres DB

2012-11-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 11/21/12 9:42 AM, Robert Haas wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 10:57 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: But, with the attached patch: rhaas=# create function xyz(smallint) returns smallint as $$select $1$$ language sql; CREATE

Re: [HACKERS] Do we need so many hint bits?

2012-11-21 Thread Jeff Davis
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 14:46 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com writes: As I said elsewhere in the thread, I'm not planning to introduce any additional locking. There is already precedent in IndexOnlyNext. Of course, that just begs the question of whether the code in

Re: [HACKERS] tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples

2012-11-21 Thread Jeff Janes
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: So what's next here? Do you want to work on these issue some more? Or does Jeff? This has been rewritten enough that I no longer feel much ownership of it. I'd prefer to leave it to Peter or Greg S., if they are

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH 03/14] Add simple xlogdump tool

2012-11-21 Thread Jeff Janes
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On 2012-11-15 09:06:23 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote: On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: --- src/bin/Makefile| 2 +- src/bin/xlogdump/Makefile | 25 +++

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH 03/14] Add simple xlogdump tool

2012-11-21 Thread Andres Freund
On 2012-11-21 14:57:14 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On 2012-11-15 09:06:23 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote: On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: --- src/bin/Makefile|

Re: [HACKERS] auto_explain WAS: RFC: Timing Events

2012-11-21 Thread Greg Smith
On 11/8/12 2:16 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: Also, logging only the long-running queries is less useful than people on this list seem to think. When I'm doing real performance analysis, I need to see *everything* which was run, not just the slow stuff. Often the real problem is a query which used

Re: [HACKERS] logical changeset generation v3

2012-11-21 Thread Andres Freund
On 2012-11-21 18:35:34 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.comwrote: On 2012-11-21 14:57:08 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: Ah, I see. Could you try the following diff? diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c

Re: [HACKERS] auto_explain WAS: RFC: Timing Events

2012-11-21 Thread Gavin Flower
On 22/11/12 12:15, Greg Smith wrote: On 11/8/12 2:16 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: Also, logging only the long-running queries is less useful than people on this list seem to think. When I'm doing real performance analysis, I need to see *everything* which was run, not just the slow stuff. Often

Re: [HACKERS] logical changeset generation v3

2012-11-21 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.comwrote: I really don't understand whats going on here then. Youve said you made sure that there is a catalog snapshot. Which means you would need something like: WARNING: connecting to postgres WARNING: Initiating logical

Re: [HACKERS] logical changeset generation v3

2012-11-21 Thread Andres Freund
On 2012-11-22 09:13:30 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.comwrote: I really don't understand whats going on here then. Youve said you made sure that there is a catalog snapshot. Which means you would need something like:

[HACKERS] Removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE

2012-11-21 Thread Jeff Davis
, Jeff Davis rm-pd-all-visible-20121121.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] binary heap implementation

2012-11-21 Thread Abhijit Menon-Sen
At 2012-11-21 15:09:12 -0500, robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: The following comments still talk about key and value, thus need an update: Oops. In the same vein, Returns NULL if the heap is empty no longer applies to binaryheap_first and binaryheap_remove_first. Plus there is an extra

Re: [HACKERS] StrategyGetBuffer questions

2012-11-21 Thread Amit Kapila
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 3:26 AM Merlin Moncure wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote: In this sprawling thread on scaling issues [1], the topic meandered into

Re: [HACKERS] User control over psql error stream

2012-11-21 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 11/21/2012 01:41:56 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On 11/15/12 3:53 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: This patch gives the end user control over psql's error stream. This allows a single psql session to use \o to send both errors and table output to multiple files. Useful when capturing test

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch: Document names of automatically created constraints and indexes

2012-11-21 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 11/21/2012 02:12:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote: On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 11:42 -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote: Could ALTER TABLE use an option to drop the primary key constraint? I needed to do that, found it was not

Re: [HACKERS] WIP json generation enhancements

2012-11-21 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 11/21/2012 03:16 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Here is a WIP patch for enhancements to json generation. First, there is the much_requested json_agg, which will aggregate rows directly to json. So the following will now work: select json_agg(my_table) from mytable; select json_agg(q)

Re: [HACKERS] User control over psql error stream

2012-11-21 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 11/21/2012 01:41:56 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On 11/15/12 3:53 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: This patch gives the end user control over psql's error stream. This allows a single psql session to use \o to send both errors and table output to multiple files. Useful when capturing test

Re: [HACKERS] FDW for PostgreSQL

2012-11-21 Thread Shigeru Hanada
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote: At execute_query(), it stores the retrieved rows onto tuplestore of festate-tuples at once. Doesn't it make problems when remote- table has very big number of rows? No. postgres_fdw uses single-row processing mode of

Re: [HACKERS] Doc patch: Document names of automatically created constraints and indexes

2012-11-21 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 11/21/2012 10:00:11 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: On 11/21/2012 02:12:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote: On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 11:42 -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote: Could ALTER TABLE use an option to drop the primary key

Re: [HACKERS] [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management

2012-11-21 Thread Pavan Deolasee
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Amit kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote: On Monday, November 19, 2012 5:53 AM Jeff Janes wrote: On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Amit kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote: On Saturday, October 20, 2012 11:03 PM Jeff Janes wrote: Run the modes in

Re: [HACKERS] PQconninfo function for libpq

2012-11-21 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
2012-11-21 22:15 keltezéssel, Magnus Hagander írta: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan z...@cybertec.at wrote: Hi, 2012-11-21 19:19 keltezéssel, Magnus Hagander írta: I'm breaking this out into it's own thread, for my own sanity if nothing else :) And it's an isolated