Hi.
Ok, ok thanks.
My problem is to shorten time of searching full text stored in text field.
The table definition is like following:
CREATE TABLE xxx
(
...
title character varying,
...
fts1body text,
...
)
If user requests keywords, we use a kind of "stristr" that is targeting
Ja
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Jaime Casanova writes:
>> not sure if you're wrong. but at the very least, you miss a
>> heap_freetuple(oldtup) there, because get_catalog_object_by_oid()
>
> Well, oldtup can be either a syscache copy or a heap tuple. I've been
> looking
On Saturday, July 06, 2013 10:00 AM mohsen soodkhah mohammadi wrote:
>hello.
>I am reading about WAL and XLOG records.
>I am beginner in them.
>can you direct me and give me some document?
Please go through the README file which is present in the following folder
for more details.
Src/b
On Sunday, July 07, 2013 3:46 PM mohsen soodkhah mohammadi wrote:
> hello .
> In Postgres.c we have a switch for firstchar . one of case of them is :
case 'Q' that is for simple queries.
> I want to know the other cases were for what operations .
> and:
> is the case with 'Q' parameter for DDL a
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 11:49:21AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 5 July 2013 18:23, David Fetter wrote:
> > Please find attached changes based on the above.
> >
>
> This looks good. The grammar changes are smaller and neater now on top
> of the makeFuncCall() patch.
>
> Overall I think this pa
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 08:55:01PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 20:15 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > I mildly recommend we reject this patch as such, remove the TODO item,
> > remove
> > the XXX comments this patch removes, and plan not to add more trivial
> > SPI
> > wrappe
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 22:50 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Would it make sense to review the local_preload_libraries semantics
> instead? It looks like session_preload_libraries only adds
> flexibility,
> and that current usages of local_preload_libraries would be served as
> well by the new sett
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 20:15 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> I mildly recommend we reject this patch as such, remove the TODO item,
> remove
> the XXX comments this patch removes, and plan not to add more trivial
> SPI
> wrappers. If consensus goes otherwise, I think we should at least
> introduce
> SPI
hello.
I am reading about WAL and XLOG records.
I am beginner in them.
can you direct me and give me some document?
I find the SPI "interface support functions" quaint. They're thin wrappers,
of ancient origin, around standard backend coding patterns. They have the
anti-feature of communicating certain programming errors through return
value/SPI_result rather than elog()/Assert(). The chance that we could
sub
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 02:01 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
>> You really want to test more than just the str. The patch contains
>> casts to int and float, which is something existing PLPython code will
>> be doing, so it's good to test it st
Hello Dimitri,
On 07/07/2013 09:51 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Markus Wanner writes:
>> Oh, I just realize that pg_extension_{template,control,uptmpl} are not
>> SHARED catalogs, but you need to install the template per-database and
>> then need to enable it - per-database *again*. Why is that?
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> This is like shared_preload_libraries except that it takes effect at
> backend start and can be changed without a full postmaster restart. It
> is like local_preload_libraries except that it is still only settable by
> a superuser. This can be a better way to load modu
On 2013-07-07 15:43:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > 3b) Add catcache 'filter' that ensures the cache stays unique and use
> > that for the mapping
>
> > I slightly prefer 3b) because it's smaller, what's your opinions?
>
> This is just another variation on the theme of
On 7 July 2013 21:35, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 17:21 +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
> > I think that these tests are much better, so they should go into
> > trunk.
> > As for Python 2.5 I think we could modify the code and makefile (with
> > additional documentation info) so the
Markus Wanner writes:
> Oh, I just realize that pg_extension_{template,control,uptmpl} are not
> SHARED catalogs, but you need to install the template per-database and
> then need to enable it - per-database *again*. Why is that?
Because the current model is not serving us well enough, with a sin
On 7 July 2013 14:08, Jeff Janes wrote:
> Why does serial_schedule even exist? Couldn't we just run the
> parallel schedule serially, like what happens when MAX_CONNECTIONS=1?
>
Well, I am sure it works that way, without errors.
The 'why' still eludes me though, just that its required for this
Andres Freund writes:
> 3b) Add catcache 'filter' that ensures the cache stays unique and use
> that for the mapping
> I slightly prefer 3b) because it's smaller, what's your opinions?
This is just another variation on the theme of kluging the catcache to
do something it shouldn't. You're s
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 11:51 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> I found it strange that those two paras read differently for saying
> the
> same thing?
>
> > +preloaded at connection start. This parameter cannot be
> changed after
> > +the start of a particular session. If a specifi
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 17:21 +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
> I think that these tests are much better, so they should go into
> trunk.
> As for Python 2.5 I think we could modify the code and makefile (with
> additional documentation info) so the decimal code wouldn't be
> compiled
> with python 2.5.
I
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 02:01 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
> You really want to test more than just the str. The patch contains
> casts to int and float, which is something existing PLPython code will
> be doing, so it's good to test it still can be done with decimal.
Let's remember that we are regr
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 12:04 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> (a) transforms aren't like other contribs, in that they are dependant on
> other contribs before you install them.
That doesn't appear to be a reason for creating subdirectories.
> (b) we can expect maybe a dozen to 18 of them in core based
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Robins Tharakan wrote:
> Thanks Fabrizio.
>
> Although parallel_schedule was a miss for this specific patch, however, I
> guess I seem to have missed out serial_schedule completely (in all patches)
> and then thanks for pointing this out. Subsequently Robert too not
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 02:18 -0700, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> as someone suggested in the previous thread, it might be a variant of
> CAST. CREATE CAST (hstore AS plpython2u) ? Or CREATE LANGUAGE TRANSFORM
> might sound better. In either case, I think we are missing the discussion
> on the standard
On 07/07/2013 02:55 PM, Markus Wanner wrote:
> If you want to just upload extensions to a database via libpq..
Let's rephrase this in a (hopefully) more constructive way: I get the
impression you are trying to satisfy many different needs. Way more that
you need to scratch your own itch. To the po
On 2013-06-28 21:47:47 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> So, from what I gather there's a slight leaning towards *not* storing
> the relation's oid in the WAL. Which means the concerns about the
> uniqueness issues with the syscaches need to be addressed. So far I know
> of three solutions:
> 1) develo
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 01:04:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Looks like I have to modify ExecEvalNullTest().
Oops, I mean ExecConstraints(). This could be tricky.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impos
On 18 June 2013 05:01, Szymon Guz wrote:
> I've checked the patch. Applies cleanly. Tests pass this time :)
Updated the patch:
- Updated ROLE names as per Robert's feedback (regress_xxx)
- Added test to serial_schedule
--
Robins Tharakan
regress_variable_v5.patch
Description: Binary data
--
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:03:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 04:29:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> No, it isn't, or at least it's far from the only place. If we're going
> >> to change this, we would also want to change the behavior of tests on
>
On 23 May 2013 18:19, Robins Tharakan wrote:
> Please find attached a patch to take code-coverage of LOCK TABLE (
> src/backend/commands/lockcmds.c) from 57% to 84%.
Updated the patch:
- Updated ROLEs as per Robert's feedback
- Added test to serial_schedule.
--
Robins Tharakan
regress_lock_v
Jeff Janes writes:
> I have a weird case where the planner doesn't choose the plan that it
> itself believes to be the fastest plan.
I poked into this a bit and found where things are going wrong. The
ideal plan for this case involves a nestloop with a parameterized inner
scan over an inheritanc
On 2013-07-07 11:11:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fabien COELHO writes:
> >> Generally, I think that the tests which return a syntax error are of
> >> limited value and should probably be dropped.
>
> > I think that it is not that simple: it is a good value to check that the
> > syntax error mess
Fabien COELHO writes:
>> Generally, I think that the tests which return a syntax error are of
>> limited value and should probably be dropped.
> I think that it is not that simple: it is a good value to check that the
> syntax error message conveys a useful information for the user, and that
>
On 26 June 2013 01:55, Robins Tharakan wrote:
>
> Code coverage improved from 36% to 68%.
>
Updated patch:
- Renamed ROLEs as per Robert's feedback (prepend regress_xxx)
- Added test to serial_schedule (missed out earlier).
--
Robins Tharakan
regress_db_v5.patch
Description: Binary data
--
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> vacuumlo is rather simpleminded about dealing with the list of LOs to be
> removed - it just fetches them as a straight resultset. For one of my our
> this resulted in an out of memory condition.
Wow, they must have had a ton of LOs. With a
On 3 January 2012 18:42, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>>> Another point that requires some thought is that switching SnapshotNow
>>> to be MVCC-based will presumably result in a noticeable increase in each
>>> backend's rate of wanting to acquire snapshots.
>
> BTW, I wonder if this couldn't be amel
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:48 PM, mohsen soodkhah mohammadi
wrote:
> hello.
> I am reading about WAL and XLOG records.
> I am beginner in them.
> can you direct me and give me some document?
> I want to know what did save in XLOG records exactly and who can create XLOG
> records?
>
You could start
On 3 July 2013 10:13, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think you should rename the roles used here to regress_rol_seq1 etc.
> to match the CREATE OPERATOR patch.
>
Please find updated patch:
- 'make check' successful with recent changes
- Renamed ROLEs as per feedback
--
Robins Tharakan
regress_sequenc
On 07/06/2013 10:30 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> I still think that we shouldn't allow creating a template for an
> extension that is already installed, though. Do you have any suggestions
> for a better error message?
Oh, I just realize that pg_extension_{template,control,uptmpl} are not
SHARED
Salut Dimitri,
On 07/06/2013 10:30 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Yes, I did share this viewpoint over the naming of the feature, but Tom
> insisted that we already have those kind of templates for text search.
I think it's a question of what mental model we want extensions to
follow. See my other
On 3 July 2013 10:19, Robert Haas wrote:
> In this particular case, I think that adding a new set of tests isn't
> the right thing anyway. Schemas are also known as namespaces, and the
> existing "namespace" test is where related test cases live. Add these
> tests there instead.
>
> Rename regr
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attoptcache.h currently uses #ifndef SPCCACHE_H. The attached patch
> fixes that.
> A quick
> $ grep -r '\#ifndef' src/include/|grep _H|awk '{print $2}'|sort|uniq -cd
> doesn't show any further duplicated ones.
Applied, thanks!
--
hello.
I am reading about WAL and XLOG records.
I am beginner in them.
can you direct me and give me some document?
I want to know what did save in XLOG records exactly and who can create
XLOG records?
hello .
In Postgres.c we have a switch for firstchar . one of case of them is :
case 'Q' that is for simple queries.
I want to know the other cases were for what operations .
and:
is the case with 'Q' parameter for DDL and DML commands?
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 10:00:16AM +0900, Kenji uno wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I want to try GIN and know programming information of GIN technology.
>
> Please teach me about these functions extractValue, extractQuery and
> consistent.
>
> I have posted question at stack overflow.
>
> http://stackoverfl
Generally, I think that the tests which return a syntax error are of
limited value and should probably be dropped.
I think that it is not that simple: it is a good value to check that the
syntax error message conveys a useful information for the user, and that
changes to the parser rules do
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On 17 June 2013 09:03, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
>>
>>> I agree. We should probably find a better name for this. Any suggestions ?
>>
>> err, I already made one...
>>
But that's not t
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 17 June 2013 09:03, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
>
>> I agree. We should probably find a better name for this. Any suggestions ?
>
> err, I already made one...
>
>>> But that's not the whole story. I can see some utility in a patch that
>>> makes
48 matches
Mail list logo
