If we are going to change that portion of the code, we may as well go a bit
forward and allow any expressions to be fetched from a foreign server
(obviously, if that server is capable of doing so). It will help, when we
come to aggregate push-down or whole query push-down (whenever that
happens).
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/06/30 20:17), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/06/30 17:47), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On 30 June 2014 22:50, Pavel Stehule Wrote:
2014-06-30 12:38 GMT+02:00 Abhijit Menon-Sen
a...@2ndquadrant.commailto:a...@2ndquadrant.com:
If I understand correctly, the design of this patch has already been
considered earlier and rejected. So I guess the patch should also be
marked rejected?
I
2014-07-01 8:16 GMT+02:00 Rajeev rastogi rajeev.rast...@huawei.com:
On 30 June 2014 22:50, Pavel Stehule Wrote:
2014-06-30 12:38 GMT+02:00 Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com:
If I understand correctly, the design of this patch has already been
considered earlier and rejected. So I
Hello,
Sorry, this was no relation with this patch.
ForeignNext materializes the slot, which would be any of physical
and virtual tuple, when system column was requested. If it was a
virtual one, file_fdw makes this, heap_form_tuple generates the
tuple as DatumTuple. The result is a jumble of
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Rajeev rastogi rajeev.rast...@huawei.com
wrote:
On 30 June 2014 22:50, Pavel Stehule Wrote:
I didn't find a related message.
?
I think there have been some confusion, the design idea were never
rejected but yes there were few feedback/ concern, which I had
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:33:33PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
Still they have not told anything about other API's
(rmdir, RemoveDirectory) which
(2014/07/01 15:13), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
We may want to modify use_physical_tlist(), to return false, in case of
foreign tables. BTW, it does return false for inheritance
2014-07-01 8:29 GMT+02:00 Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Rajeev rastogi rajeev.rast...@huawei.com
wrote:
On 30 June 2014 22:50, Pavel Stehule Wrote:
I didn't find a related message.
?
I think there have been some confusion, the design idea were
Michael Paquier wrote:
After sleeping on it, I have put my hands on the postgres_fdw portion and
came up with a largely
simplified flow, resulting in the patch attached.
[...]
Ronan, what do you think of those patches? I have nothing more to add, and I
think that they should be
looked by
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/07/01 15:13), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
We may want to modify use_physical_tlist(), to
hi,
can any one help me with the 4th and 5th steps of the following link which
is to debug with a child process in postgres.
*https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Working_with_Eclipse#Debugging_with_child_processes
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Working_with_Eclipse#Debugging_with_child_processes*
Le mardi 1 juillet 2014 06:59:49 Albe Laurenz a écrit :
Michael Paquier wrote:
After sleeping on it, I have put my hands on the postgres_fdw portion and
came up with a largely
simplified flow, resulting in the patch attached.
[...]
Ronan, what do you think of those patches? I
(2014/07/01 16:04), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but what's the point of using the
tlist, not reltargetlist?
Compliance with other
On 29 June 2014 20:42, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
To try and clarify what this distinction is-
Dean's approach with GRANT allows specifying the policy to be
used when a given role queries a given table. Through this mechanism,
one role might have access to many different tables,
Hi,
At Tue, 01 Jul 2014 16:30:41 +0900, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote in 53b263a1.3060...@lab.ntt.co.jp
I've got the point.
As I said upthread, I'll work on calculating attr_needed for child
rels, and I hope that that will eliminate your concern.
Inheritance tree is
On 01 July 2014 12:26, Pavel Stehule Wrote:
Have you checked the discussion in Developer meeting notes. Please
check the same at below link:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2012_Developer_Meeting#Autonomous_Transactions
Are these notes still valid?
* Why autonomous transaction should be
2014-07-01 10:38 GMT+02:00 Rajeev rastogi rajeev.rast...@huawei.com:
On 01 July 2014 12:26, Pavel Stehule Wrote:
Have you checked the discussion in Developer meeting notes. Please
check the same at below link:
Re: Kevin Grittner 2014-06-09
1402267501.4.yahoomail...@web122304.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
@@ -536,6 +539,24 @@ PGSharedMemoryCreate(Size size, bool makePrivate, int
port,
*/
}
+#ifdef USE_LIBNUMA
+ /*
+ * If this is not a private segment and we are using
Le dimanche 29 juin 2014 16:54:03 Tom Lane a écrit :
Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
3) This is such a simple change with no new infrastructure code
(PLyObject_ToComposite already exists). Can you think of a reason
why this wasn't done until now? Was it a simple miss or
On 2014-06-30 22:44:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-06-30 19:22:59 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-06-30 12:46:29 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
, which if I understand you correctly are ARM without GCC
Hi,
Over at -performance Mark Kirkwood tested a recent version of this
(http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/53B283F3.7020005%40catalyst.net.nz)
. I thought it's interesting to add the numbers to this thread:
Test: pgbench
Options: scale 500
read only
Os: Ubuntu 14.04
Pg:
Hello, I had a look on this patch.
Let me show you some comments about the README, Makefile and
buffer_capture_cmp of the second part for the present. A
continuation of this comment would be seen later..
- contrib/buffer_capture_cmp/README
- 'contains' seems duplicate in the first paragraph.
On 2014-07-01 10:44:19 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
I think for such usage, we need to rely on barriers wherever there is a
need for synchronisation, recent example I have noticed is in your patch
where we have to use pg_write_barrier() during wakeup. However if we
go by atomic ops definition,
On 2014-07-01 11:01:04 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Kevin Grittner 2014-06-09
1402267501.4.yahoomail...@web122304.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
@@ -536,6 +539,24 @@ PGSharedMemoryCreate(Size size, bool makePrivate, int
port,
*/
}
+#ifdef USE_LIBNUMA
+ /*
+
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-07-01 11:01:04 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
How much difference would it make if numactl --interleave=all
was used instead of using numa_interleave_memory() on the shared
memory segments? I guess that would make backend-local memory
also
On 07/01/2014 01:08 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
Over at -performance Mark Kirkwood tested a recent version of this
(http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/53B283F3.7020005%40catalyst.net.nz)
. I thought it's interesting to add the numbers to this thread:
Test: pgbench
Options: scale 500
I spent some more time on the patch and here are my review comments.
.) Patch gets applied through patch -p1 (git apply fails)
.) trailing whitespace in the patch at various places
.) Unnecessary new line + and - in the patch.
(src/backend/rewrite/rewriteManip.c::getInsertSelectQuery())
Re: Kevin Grittner 2014-07-01
1404213492.98740.yahoomail...@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-07-01 11:01:04 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
How much difference would it make if numactl --interleave=all
was used instead of using
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Ronan Dunklau ronan.dunk...@dalibo.com
wrote:
The remote_schema parameter can be used for SQL injection. Either we
should go
back to using parameters, or be extra careful. Since the remote schema is
parsed as a name, it is limited to 64 characters which is not
Re: Tom Lane 2014-06-23 17054.1403542...@sss.pgh.pa.us
While I'd love to reduce the number of future installations without
this fix in place, I respect the decision to honor project policy. At
the same time, this change does not break anything. It introduces new
environment variables which
On 6/29/14, 12:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I'm tempted to just rip out all the useless code rather than fix the
logic bug as such. OTOH, that might complicate updating to more recent
versions of the original Autoconf macro. On the third hand, we've not
bothered to do that in ten years either.
I'm sorry to interrupt you, but I feel strong sympathy with Stephen-san.
From: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
I don't think that's a valid objection. If we someday have auditing
in core, and if it subsumes what pgaudit does, then whatever
interfaces pgaudit implements can be replaced with
Why is this even a small concern? Initdb runs the bootstrap SQL which does
various SQL operations so it's not surprising there are some updates
creating garbage. Iirc we don't even rely on template0 being frozen any
more.
--
greg
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:09 PM, furu...@pm.nttdata.co.jp wrote:
Thanks for the review!
+if (secs = 0)
+secs = 1;/* Always sleep at least 1 sec */
+
+sleeptime = secs * 1000 + usecs / 1000;
The above is the code which caused that problem.
On 30 June 2014 16:20, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
I think the fact that pgaudit does X and you think it should do Y is a
perfect example of why we're nowhere
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Here's a patch to make pg_xlogdump print summary statistics instead of
individual records.
Thanks! I had a use for this feature so I backported the (first) patch
to PostgreSQL 9.3. It's a rush job so it's ugly and may
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
If we're going to do it like this, then I think the force flag
should be considered to do nothing except override the clock
check, which probably means it shouldn't be tested in the initial
if() at all.
That makes sense, and is easily done. The only
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Rushabh Lathia rushabh.lat...@gmail.com wrote:
.) In map_primary_key_to_list() patch using INDEX_ATTR_BITMAP_IDENTITY_KEY
bitmap to get the keycols. In IndexAttrBitmapKind there is also
INDEX_ATTR_BITMAP_KEY, so was confuse between INDEX_ATTR_BITMAP_KEY and
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
On a micro-optimization level, it might be worth passing the TID as
ItemPointer not ItemPointerData (ie, pass a
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
Another big change in the attached patch version is that XLogRegisterData()
now *copies* the data to a working area, instead of merely adding a
XLogRecData entry to the chain. This simplifies things in xlog.c,
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I think it's pretty much a given that pg_resetxlog is a tool that can
have disastrous effects if used lightly. If people changes their sysid
wrongly, they're not any worse than if they change their multixact
On 2014-07-01 11:11:12 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I think it's pretty much a given that pg_resetxlog is a tool that can
have disastrous effects if used lightly. If people changes their sysid
wrongly, they're
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I think it's pretty much a given that pg_resetxlog is a tool that can
have disastrous effects if used lightly. If people changes their sysid
wrongly, they're not any worse than if they
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2. I think it would be reasonable to try to kill off the connection
without notifying the client if we're unable to send the data to the
client in a reasonable period of time. But I'm unsure what a
The simplified scene:
select slowfunction(s) from a order by b limit 1;
is slow than
select slowfunction(s) from (select s from a order by b limit 1) as z;
if there are many records in table 'a'.
The real scene. Function ST_Distance_Sphere is slow, the query:
SELECT ST_Distance_Sphere(s,
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I am, however, kind of frustrated, still, that the pg_computemaxlsn
patch, which I thought was rather a good idea, was scuttled by the
essentially that same objection: let's not extend pg_resetxlog
friends because
On 06/29/2014 02:58 PM, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
Last I checked, NetBSD doesn't support any sort of multiprocessor VAX.
Multiprocessor VAXes exist, but you're stuck with either Ultrix or VMS
on them.
Hi Pat, it's good to see your name in my inbox.
NetBSD ran on multiprocessor BI-bus VAXen
On 06/29/2014 10:54 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Is there anyone in the NetBSD/VAX community who would be willing to
host a PG buildfarm member?
I could put together a simh-based machine (i.e., fast) on a vm, if
nobody else has stepped up for this.
No other volunteers have emerged, so if
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:24:22AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=coypudt=2014-06-29%2012%3A33%3A12
so I'm a bit confused as to what we need to change for VAX.
Dave did use NetBSD 6.1 (IIRC), which uses an ancient gcc version.
I would suggest to go
On 06/29/2014 03:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Hey, right up the river from here!
Come on up and hack! There's always something neat going on around
here. Ever run a PDP-11? B-)
There were so many PDP-11s around CMU when I was an undergrad that
I remember seeing spare ones being used as
On 2014-06-29 12:12, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 06/29/2014 03:10 PM, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
And it also runs on the 11/780 which can have multiple CPUs... but I've
never seen support for using more than one CPU (and the NetBSD page
still says NetBSD/vax can only make use of one CPU on multi-CPU
On 06/25/2014 01:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:05 PM, John Klos j...@ziaspace.com wrote:
While I wouldn't be surprised if you remove the VAX code because not many
people are going to be running PostgreSQL, I'd disagree with the
On 06/29/2014 02:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Well, the issue from our point of view is that a lot of what we care about
testing is extremely low-level hardware behavior, like whether spinlocks
work as expected across processors. It's not clear that a simulator would
provide a sufficiently accurate
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
You know, looking at this, I wonder if we shouldn't just remove
support for ARMv5 instead of making a blind stab at a fix.
Well, I argued that way for a while ;). We don't even need to really
desupport it, but just
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com wrote:
An annoying complication, however, is how this interacts with column
privileges. Right now GRANT SELECT(col1) ON t1 TO role1 gives role1
access to every row in col1, and I think that has to remain the case,
since
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
You know, looking at this, I wonder if we shouldn't just remove
support for ARMv5 instead of making a blind stab at a fix.
Well, I argued that
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Dilip kumar dilip.ku...@huawei.com wrote:
On 01 July 2014 03:48, Alvaro Wrote,
In particular, pgpipe is almost an exact duplicate between them,
except the copy in vac_parallel.c has fallen behind changes made to
parallel.c. (Those changes would have fixed
I've always been a bit reluctant to accept buildfarm members that are
constantly being updated, because it seemed to me that it created
something with too many variables. However, we occasionally get requests
from people who want to run on such platforms, and I'm also a bit
reluctant to turn
On 2014-07-01 11:46:19 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
You know, looking at this, I wonder if we shouldn't just remove
support for ARMv5
Simon,
* Simon Riggs (si...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
On 30 June 2014 16:20, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
eh? The focus of this patch is to add auditing to PG and having very
clearly drawn auditing requirements of a very large customer isn't
relevant? I don't follow that logic
At 2014-06-30 22:06:30 -0400, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I went ahead and committed this patch, and also some further work to
fix the multicharacter-source problem. I took it on myself to make
the code issue warnings about misformatted lines, too.
Thanks, looks good. I found the
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
A few years back I ported the postresql client libraries and a few
other pieces of software (in particular subversion) to a lot of
obscure platforms (old sparc, hpux, irix, older aix, etc etc).
Getting a modern gcc
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
Why is this even a small concern? Initdb runs the bootstrap SQL which does
various SQL operations so it's not surprising there are some updates
creating garbage. Iirc we don't even rely on template0 being frozen any
more.
It's
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
I've always been a bit reluctant to accept buildfarm members that are
constantly being updated, because it seemed to me that it created something
with too many variables. However, we occasionally get requests from people
On 06/29/2014 02:25 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-06-29 11:11:14 +0100, Thomas Munro wrote:
On 29 June 2014 10:55, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
So, I'd looked at it with an eye towards committing it and found some
more things. I've now
* added the restriction that the
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
The bottom line is that I love supporting obscure platforms as much as
anyone here, and several other committers are already telling me that
I love it too much. We've got to draw the line somewhere, and I think
refusing to ship newly-written code that
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:05:50PM +0800, gotoschool6g wrote:
The simplified scene:
select slowfunction(s) from a order by b limit 1;
is slow than
select slowfunction(s) from (select s from a order by b limit 1) as z;
if there are many records in table 'a'.
The real scene. Function
On 1 July 2014 17:42, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com wrote:
An annoying complication, however, is how this interacts with column
privileges. Right now GRANT SELECT(col1) ON t1 TO role1 gives role1
access to every
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 12:26:43PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
1. I think it's the case that there are platforms around where a
signal won't cause send() to return EINTR and I'd be entirely
unsurprised if SSL_write() doesn't necessarily return EINTR in that
case. I'm not sure
Hi.
Do we have any consensus about what to do with these two patches?
1. Introduce a log_replication_command setting.
2. Change log_statement to be a list of tokens.
If I understand correctly, there weren't any strong objections to the
former, but the situation is less clear when it comes to
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout
klep...@svana.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:05:50PM +0800, gotoschool6g wrote:
The simplified scene:
select slowfunction(s) from a order by b limit 1;
is slow than
select slowfunction(s) from (select s from a order by b limit 1)
At 2014-06-17 13:21:34 +0530, jeevan.cha...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Anyone has any other views ?
I guess nobody has strong feelings either way. I've marked this
(i.e. your slightly-revised patch) ready for committer.
-- Abhijit
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
The bottom line is that I love supporting obscure platforms as much as
anyone here, and several other committers are already telling me that
I love it too much. We've got to draw the
Hi Ronan.
Based on your review, I'm marking this as ready for committer.
The attached patch implements this.
Your patch looks sensible enough (thanks for adding tests), but I guess
we'll let the reviewer sort out whether to commit the original or your
extended version.
Thanks.
-- Abhijit
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 July 2014 17:42, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com
wrote:
An annoying complication, however, is how this interacts with column
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:
Re: Tom Lane 2014-06-23 17054.1403542...@sss.pgh.pa.us
While I'd love to reduce the number of future installations without
this fix in place, I respect the decision to honor project policy. At
the same time, this change
Merlin Moncure-2 wrote
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout
lt;
kleptog@
gt; wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:05:50PM +0800, gotoschool6g wrote:
The simplified scene:
select slowfunction(s) from a order by b limit 1;
is slow than
select slowfunction(s) from (select s
At 2014-07-01 16:39:57 +0300, ma...@juffo.org wrote:
Here's a patch to make pg_xlogdump print summary statistics instead
of individual records.
Thanks! I had a use for this feature so I backported the (first) patch
to PostgreSQL 9.3. It's a rush job so it's ugly and may have bugs, but
it
At 2014-06-27 16:11:21 +0200, vik.fear...@dalibo.com wrote:
After a week of silence from Jov, I decided to do this myself since it
didn't seem very hard.
Many frustrating hours of trying to understand why I'm getting
shift/reduce conflicts by the hundreds later, I've decided to give up
for
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:
I have two comments on the patch:
The choice to make the behavior depend first on PG_OOM_ADJUST_FILE and
only secondly on PG_OOM_ADJUST_VALUE seems the wrong way round to me.
Of
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Despite my concerns about keeping the list of supported atomics short,
and I do have concerns in that area, I'm not really sure that we have
much choice but to go in that direction. We can't accept a 5x
performance hit in the name of portability, and
On 02/07/14 06:02, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
I've always been a bit reluctant to accept buildfarm members that are
constantly being updated, because it seemed to me that it created something
with too many variables. However, we
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 3:06 PM, David G Johnston
david.g.johns...@gmail.com wrote:
Merlin Moncure-2 wrote
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout
lt;
kleptog@
gt; wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:05:50PM +0800, gotoschool6g wrote:
The simplified scene:
select
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Despite my concerns about keeping the list of supported atomics short,
and I do have concerns in that area, I'm not really sure that we have
much choice but to go in that direction. We
On 01/07/14 11:04, Andres Freund wrote:
Since we have a Sun Studio machine in the buildfarm, we shouldn't give
up on SPARC completely, but maybe we should only add the cases for
sparcv8+ and above? That at least has some chance of getting tested.
That we have code for sparcv7 is ridiculous
On 2014-07-01 23:21:07 +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 01/07/14 11:04, Andres Freund wrote:
Since we have a Sun Studio machine in the buildfarm, we shouldn't give
up on SPARC completely, but maybe we should only add the cases for
sparcv8+ and above? That at least has some chance of
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
I have reviewed this patch, and think we should do what the patch
is trying to do, but I don't think the submitted patch would
actually work.
Just curious, why do you think it won't work. Although the discussion
is a bit
On 01/07/14 23:25, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 07/01/2014 01:08 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
Over at -performance Mark Kirkwood tested a recent version of this
(http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/53B283F3.7020005%40catalyst.net.nz)
. I thought it's interesting to add the numbers to
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
If we're going to do it like this, then I think the force flag
should be considered to do nothing except override the clock
check, which probably means it shouldn't be tested in the
Vik Fearing vik.fear...@dalibo.com writes:
Okay, here is version two of the refactoring patch that documents that
the with-space version is deprecated but still accepted.
The feature patch is not affected by this and so I am not attaching a
new version of that.
I've committed this without
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Gurjeet Singh gurj...@singh.im wrote:
I don't have intimate knowledge of recovery but I think the above
assessment of recovery's operations holds true. If you still think
this is a
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-07-01 23:21:07 +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
Also if you're struggling for Sun buildfarm animals, recent versions of QEMU
will quite happily install and run later versions of 32-bit Solaris over
serial, and 2.0 even manages to give you a
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
I've always been a bit reluctant to accept buildfarm members that are
constantly being updated, because it seemed to me that it created something
with too many variables.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
In CF terms, did you form any opinion while porting the patch I posted
about whether it's sensible/ready for inclusion in 9.5?
I didn't look at the code more than necessary to make the build work.
As far as
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 05:04:06PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Attached is the rebased patch of v11 up to the current master.
I've been studying this patch.
SELECT FOR UPDATE on the inheritance parent fails with a can't-happen error
condition, even when SELECT FOR UPDATE on the child
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Cédric Villemain ced...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Le lundi 3 février 2014 19:18:54 Gurjeet Singh a écrit :
Possible enhancements:
- Ability to save/restore only specific databases.
- Control how many BlockReaders are active at a time; to avoid I/O
storms.
FWIW,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/13/2014 07:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jun 12,
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 08:35:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
I'm also not sure how to designate these machines. The buildfarm server
metadata isn't designed for auto-updating
At 2014-07-02 04:20:31 +0300, ma...@juffo.org wrote:
As far as functionality goes, it does exactly what I needed it to do;
the output is very clear.
Good to hear.
You might also add units (kB/MB) to the table like pg_size_pretty,
although that would make the magnitudes harder to gauge.
I
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
