On 12/20/2014 05:59 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
mailto:amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com mailto:hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
On 12/16/2014 06:30
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 03:41:13PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
Bruce,
What is our history of doing things in contrib because we are not sure
what we want, then moving it into core? My general recollection is that
there is usually something in the contrib version we don't want to add
to
On 2015-05-08 22:08:31 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
That seems a bit better. I think it's really important, if we're
going to start to try to make fsync=off anything other than a toy,
I think it's long past that. I've seen many, many people use it during
initial data loading.
that we document
Hi,
The attached updated patch reduces both of those do-loop tests to about
60 msec on my machine. It contains two improvements over the 1.1 patch:
Looking at this. First reading the patch to understand the details.
* The VARTAG_IS_EXPANDED(tag) trick in VARTAG_SIZE is unlikely to
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
I have a feeling that much of the GUC machinery could be reworked; as
Jim mentioned up-thread, it might be possible to use memory contexts too
which would make a lot of it much cleaner, I believe.
Err, on another thread, not on this one. :)
And Jim
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-05-08 22:08:31 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Of course, even the last one isn't totally bullet-proof. Suppose one
backend fails to absorb the new setting for some reason...
I've a hard time worrying much about that one...
You should. At the very
Stephen Frost wrote:
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
I think the code is OK, but yeah, this comment should be changed to
reflect the idea that the function will append entries to an existing
list of name/value pairs (and thus, that head_p/tail_p are not output
but in/out
* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
I think the code is OK, but yeah, this comment should be changed to
reflect the idea that the function will append entries to an existing
list of name/value pairs (and thus,
All,
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
Starting a new thread, as suggested by Robert, for consideration of
adding default roles for sets of administrative functions, therefore
removing the need for superuser-level roles in many use-cases.
[...]
This is part 2 and really the guts
At 2015-05-09 02:20:51 +0200, and...@anarazel.de wrote:
+ * Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com
+ * Portions Copyright (c) 2001,2002Tatsuo Ishii (from pgstattuple)
I think for new extension we don't really add authors and such anymore.
OK, I'll get rid of the boilerplate.
Hm.
Tom,
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
I'm all for improving performance of postgres_fdw and would like to see
us support sending queries off to be worked asyncronously, but starting
execution on the remote server during ExecInitNode is against
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I think that we'd really be better off insisting on same server (as in
same pg_foreign_server OID), hence automatically same FDW, and what's
even more important, same user mapping for
v2 applied tested.
[...] Not sure about that, the tests are placed here to be consistent
with for is done for float8.
Maybe float8 to numeric casts could have been in numeric too.
[...] I reworked the example in the docs.
Indeed, looks good.
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
2015-05-09 11:21 GMT+09:00 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
... btw, I just noticed something that had escaped me because it seems so
obviously wrong that I had not even stopped to consider the possibility
that the code was
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
I think the code is OK, but yeah, this comment should be changed to
reflect the idea that the function will append entries to an existing
list of name/value pairs (and thus, that head_p/tail_p are not output
but in/out parameters).
I've pushed a fix for
2015-05-09 8:18 GMT+09:00 Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp:
2015-05-09 2:46 GMT+09:00 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Kouhei Kaigai kai...@ak.jp.nec.com writes:
I've been trying to code-review this patch, because the documentation
seemed several bricks shy of a load, and I find myself entirely
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
Quick review: patches applies, make check is fine, all is well.
Thanks for the feedback, Fabien!
All the casting tests could be put in numeric.sql, as there are all
related to numeric and that would avoid duplicating the values lists.
Not
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 8 May 2015 at 13:02, Michael Paquier wrote:
I think that we should redefine subxcnt as uint32 for consistency with
xcnt, and remove the two assertions that 924bcf4 has introduced. I
could get a patch quickly done FWIW.
(uint32) +1
2015-05-09 8:32 GMT+09:00 Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp:
2015-05-09 3:51 GMT+09:00 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
That's nice, but 9.5 feature freeze is only a week away. I don't have
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 5/7/15, Sawada Masahiko
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:55 PM,
Hi all,
Attached patch fixes the typo is in reindexdb documentation regarding
REINDEX SCHEMA.
Regards,
---
Sawada Masahiko
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindexdb.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindexdb.sgml
index b5b449c..a745f6c 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindexdb.sgml
+++
Sawada,
* Sawada Masahiko (sawada.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
Attached patch fixes the typo is in reindexdb documentation regarding
REINDEX SCHEMA.
Fix pushed, thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
23 matches
Mail list logo
