On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
In any case, we are going to need at least (void) in front of those calls.
We're needing nothing of the sort.
I don't really understand your reluctance here. As one example, see
c831593 where similar fixes are done and even back-patched.
--
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Ildus Kurbangaliev
i.kurbangal...@postgrespro.ru wrote:
Hello.
Currently, PostgreSQL offers many metrics for monitoring. However, detailed
monitoring of waits is still not supported
On 07/09/2015 04:10 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Please submit a patch to adjust the treatment of negative integers in the
old functions to be
On Jul 9, 2015, at 5:18 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com
mailto:kommi.harib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Ildus Kurbangaliev
i.kurbangal...@postgrespro.ru wrote:
Hello.
Currently,
On 2015-07-09 10:39:35 -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
If the wal_level=minimal we don't need to force the wal log of the
contents. If the wal_level != minimal we need just to xlog all the pages,
but in both cases we don't need the extra job to create a new datafiles and
copy the
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
Here is v6, a rebased version on HEAD (79f2b5d). There were some
conflicts with the indentation and some other patches related to
pg_rewind and initdb's
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-07-09 10:39:35 -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
If the wal_level=minimal we don't need to force the wal log of the
contents. If the wal_level != minimal we need just to xlog all the
pages,
but in both
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-07-09 10:39:35 -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
If the wal_level=minimal we don't need to force the wal log of the
contents. If the wal_level != minimal we need just to xlog all the pages,
but in both cases we don't need the extra job to
On 2015-07-07 15:41, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-07-07 22:36:29 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi,
I am getting tired installing manually required extensions manually. I was
wondering if we might want to add option to
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
One function had a comment explaining its workaround for an OS bug, while
another function ignored the same bug. That is always a defect in the
comments at least; our code shall tell a uniform story about its API
2015-07-09 15:17 GMT+02:00 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
second version of this patch
make check-world passed
quickly scanning the patch, the implementation is trivial (minus
regression test
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
One idea I had was to allow the COPY optimization only if the heap file is
physically zero-length at the time the COPY starts.
This seems not helpful for the case where TRUNCATE is
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-07-09 15:17 GMT+02:00 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
second version of this patch
make check-world passed
quickly
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
I attach a compatibility note that is clearly needed; adding this is
an open item of mine for 9.5. This concerns foreign data wrappers and
UPSERT.
Are you going to review this, Bruce? It is an open item for 9.5.
I would
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you for bug report, and comments.
Fixed version is attached, and source code comment is also updated.
Please review it.
I am
On 2015-07-06 11:49:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
One idea I had was to allow the COPY optimization only if the heap file is
physically zero-length at the time the COPY starts. That would still be
able to optimize in all the cases we care about making COPY fast for.
Rather than reverting
2015-07-03 12:27 GMT+02:00 Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi:
On 05/27/2015 09:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 05/27/2015 02:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr
oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de wrote:
Is it reasonable to add this patch to CommitFest
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Also something for pg_upgrade is also not yet.
TODO
- Test case for this feature
- pg_upgrade support.
I had forgotten to change the fork name of visibility map to vfm.
Attached latest v7 patch.
Please review it.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
[...]
+ /* Caclculate max data size on page according to fillfactor */
s/Caclculate/Calculate
When creating a simple gin index, I am seeing that GinGetMaxDataSize gets
called with ginEntryInsert:
* frame #0: 0x00010a49d72e
I am not sure, if it is not useless work.
I don't understand why an implementation taking approach 2.a would be
useless. As I said, its performance will be no worse than current temp
tables and it will provide a lot of convenience to users who need to create
temp tables in every session.
On 2015/07/09 15:30, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 07/09/2015 07:19 AM, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
On 2015/07/09 13:06, Tom Lane wrote:
Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp writes:
I just found that Log_disconnections value has not been
exposed to outside of postgres.c.
Despite that,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
There is still the case of pages which had their visibility bit set
On 2015-07-09 01:28:28 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
- Keep the OID check, shouldn't hurt to have it
What benefit is left?
A bit of defense in depth. We execute user defined code in COPY
(e.g. BEFORE triggers). That user defined code could very well replace
the relation. Now I think right now
On 07/09/2015 07:19 AM, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
On 2015/07/09 13:06, Tom Lane wrote:
Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp writes:
I just found that Log_disconnections value has not been
exposed to outside of postgres.c.
Despite that, Log_connections has already been exposed.
Why would an
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached is a patch that implements the vm scan for truncation. It
introduces a variable to hold the last blkno which was skipped during
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Please submit a patch to adjust the treatment of negative integers in the
old functions to be consistent with their treatment in the new functions.
The 9th edition of the Italian PostgreSQL Day ( PGDay.it 2015 ) will be
held on Friday , 23th October 2015 in Prato, Italy.
The International Call for Papers has opened and will close on 8th August
2015.
For more information about the conference and the International Call for
Paper, please visit
On 15 June 2015 at 12:05, David Rowley david.row...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This basically allows an aggregate's state to be shared between other
aggregate functions when both aggregate's transition functions (and a few
other things) match
There's quite a number of aggregates in our standard
On 07/09/2015 04:50 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Looking at the manual page of Test::More, it looks like you could change
where the perl script's STDOUT and STDERR point to, because Test::More
takes
a copy of them (when? at program
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
ISTM that one our consensus is to make wal_compression SUSET
as the first step whatever approach we adopt for the risk in question
later. So, barring any objection, I will commit the attached patch
and change the context to PGC_SUSET.
That's
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi wrote:
Thanks, fixed the parenthesis and committed.
Thanks. I imagine that this is going to need some tuning with the
buildfarm before this becomes really useful. I will re-enable the TAP
tests of hamster once that's the case.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
second version of this patch
make check-world passed
quickly scanning the patch, the implementation is trivial (minus
regression test adjustments), and is, IMSNSHO, the right solution.
Several of the source
On 07/09/2015 04:09 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi wrote:
The missing --debug is a separate issue.
I won't argue against that, but is it worth creating a new thread just
for this one-liner? The local mode of pg_rewind uses it
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
ISTM that one our consensus is to make wal_compression SUSET
as the first step whatever approach we adopt for the risk in question
later. So, barring any
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi wrote:
In dataPlaceToPageLeaf-function:
if (append)
{
/*
* Even when appending, trying to append more items than
will fit is
* not completely free,
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-07-08 10:58:51 -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
Think in an ETL job that can be use an unlogged table to improve the
load
performance, but this job create a large table and to guarantee the
data
Hi!
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Stas Kelvich stas.kelv...@gmail.com wrote:
Patch is pretty ready, last issue was about changed extension interface,
so there should be migration script and version bump.
Attaching a version with all migration stuff.
I can't see cube--1.0--1.1.sql in the
Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi writes:
Pushed, thanks.
Shouldn't we consider back-patching these improvements into 9.5 and 9.4?
ISTM the main point is to help debug buildfarm failures, and we won't be
getting much benefit if only one-third of such reports have decent
logging.
2015-07-09 22:57 GMT+02:00 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-07-09 20:08 GMT+02:00 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-07-09 20:08 GMT+02:00 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-07-09 15:17 GMT+02:00 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-07-06 11:14:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
The COUNT() correctly says 11 rows, but after crash-and-recover,
only the row with -1 is there. This is because the INSERT writes
out an
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-07-06 11:49:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Rather than reverting cab9a0656c36739f, which would re-introduce a
different performance problem, perhaps we could have COPY create a new
relfilenode when it does this. That should be safe if the table was
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
the comment about NOTICE level in elog.h is obsolete
Committed. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi writes:
Pushed, thanks.
Shouldn't we consider back-patching these improvements into 9.5 and 9.4?
ISTM the main point is to help debug buildfarm failures, and we won't be
getting much
44 matches
Mail list logo
