Tom Lane schrieb:
Andreas Wenk writes:
I am not sure when the function shobj_description(oid, name) is giving a
result.
That retrieves the comment for the object (the role, in this case).
regards, tom lane
attached you can find an updated patch. The changes are
Tom Lane wrote:
Andreas Wenk writes:
I am not sure when the function shobj_description(oid, name) is giving a
result.
That retrieves the comment for the object (the role, in this case).
regards, tom lane
Tom, thank you. I will provide an updated patch tomorrow
ANdreas Wenk schrieb:
Hi,
attached you can find a very small patch for the help in psql (\?). It's
possible to use \du also as \du+ . The [+] was missing in help.
I was asking about this at the general list and Peter E. was asking me
to provide a patch. I sent the patch there but rea
Tom Lane wrote:
ANdreas Wenk writes:
actually I discovered that using \du and \dg in psql is providing the
same result:
Yup. The psql documentation says as much.
ok - got it ;-)
Should have read the psql docu ...
I am wondering why there is \dg at all.
Users and groups used to be
Hi,
actually I discovered that using \du and \dg in psql is providing the
same result:
book=# \du
* QUERY **
SELECT r.rolname, r.rolsuper, r.rolinherit,
r.rolcreaterole, r.rolcreatedb, r.rolcanlogin,
r.rolconnlimit,
ARRAY(SELECT b.rolname
FROM pg_catalog.pg_auth_m
Hi,
attached you can find a very small patch for the help in psql (\?). It's
possible to use \du also as \du+ . The [+] was missing in help.
I was asking about this at the general list and Peter E. was asking me
to provide a patch. I sent the patch there but realized now, that this
was the w