On Пт, 2015-10-16 at 09:02 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Dmitry Vasilyev <d.vasilyev@postgres
> pro.ru> wrote:
> > I think that function dsm_impl_windows() with EACCES error should
> > not
> > do ereport() with FATAL level. It w
I’ve created 2 unprivileged users: user1 and user2; and registered 2
services thorough pg_ctl register respectively under these 2 users. If
first service is running second could not start and vice versa.
Dmitry Vasilyev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres
I think that function dsm_impl_windows() with EACCES error should not
do ereport() with FATAL level. It works, but it is likely to make an
infinite loop if the user will receive EACCES error.
On Чт, 2015-10-15 at 17:46 +0300, Dmitry Vasilyev wrote:
> I’ve created 2 unprivileged users: us
fixes the issue for me. Another invasive fix in case we want to
> retain shared memory handle for some purpose (future requirement)
> could
> be to send some signal to syslogger in restart path so that it can
> release
> the shared memory handle.
>
>
>
> With Regards,
> A
in that wouldn't be a bad thing either.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
This patch is working for me,
binaries: https://goo.gl/32j7QE (MSVC 2010, build script here:
https://github.com/postgrespro/pgwininstall).
--
Dmitry Vasilyev
Postgres Professional: http:
:
> > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Dmitry Vasilyev
> > > postgres=# select 1;
> > > server closed the connection unexpectedly
> > > This probably means the server terminated abnormally
> > > before or while processing the request.
> > > The connect
Hello Tom!
On Сб, 2015-10-10 at 10:55 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dmitry Vasilyev <d.vasil...@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> > I have written, what service stopped. This action is repeatable.
> > You can run command 'psql -c "do $$ unpack p,1x8 $$ language
> > plper
ice not failing. So
what’s the problem? Why PostgreSQL is so strange on Windows?
--
Dmitry Vasilyev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
h
.
!>
--> >
> Hello Dmitry
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owne
> > r...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Dmitry Vasilyev
> > Sent: Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015 11:52
> > To: pgsql
Hi!
By default, HAproxy configuration can not be changed without breaking a
connection with the client :)
--
Dmitry Vasilyev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 12:27 +1000, James Sewell wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have
We did not got any affect on core 64 with smt = 8, and we not have a 64
-cpu x86 machine with disable HT feature.
You can set scale > 1000 and with shared_buffers >> size of index
pgbench_accounts_pkey.
You can also increase the concurrency: not only access top of b-tree
index, but also to a
11 matches
Mail list logo