Howdy,
Can anyone explain to me when psql tries to convert between encodings?
It seems to disregard encodings set with SET CLIENT_ENCODING.
The following reproduces the behaviour I'm seeing:
1. create an UNICODE database
2. run the following:
set client_encoding to latin1;
create tabl
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 10:39:24AM +0200, John Anderson allegedly wrote:
> AFAIK, OLAP backends essentially provide a cache of denormalised data
> that provide fast access (no need to re-run complex queries) to large
> data sets, and a set of aggregate functions to analyse the data.
>
> There's a
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 02:03:16PM -0700, Nathan Myers allegedly wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 02:24:17PM +0200, Mathijs Brands wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:03:31PM -0700, Naomi Walker allegedly wrote:
> > > At 04:30 PM 7/5/01 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:03:31PM -0700, Naomi Walker allegedly wrote:
> At 04:30 PM 7/5/01 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >I have purchased the Solaris source code from Sun for $80. (I could
> >have downloaded it for free after faxing them an 11 page contract, but I
> >decided I wanted the CD's.
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:30:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian allegedly wrote:
> I have purchased the Solaris source code from Sun for $80. (I could
> have downloaded it for free after faxing them an 11 page contract, but I
> decided I wanted the CD's.) See the slashdot story at:
>
> http://sla
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 11:44:18AM +1000, Philip Warner allegedly wrote:
> At 01:14 14/04/01 +0200, Mathijs Brands wrote:
> ...
> >sol2:~$ pg_dump -b -Fc -f blaat.bk blaat
> >sol2:~$ pg_restore -l blaat.bk
> ...
> >;
> >; Archive created at Sat Apr 14 01:03:02 20
Hi
I've been experimenting with 7.1rc4 for a couple of hours. I was messing with
blobs, and the new toast setup worked quite nicely. One thing I especially
liked was the fact that by having pg_dump create a dumpfile in the custom or
tar format, I could also backup all blobs in one go.
Unfortunat
Hi
I've been running RC3 regression tests, starting with a FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE
and a Solaris 7 Sparc box. Both tests ran without any problems. I tried
Solaris 8 Sparc next: it still suffered from the same unix socket problems.
I had a look at the code and it seems to me that the use of unix socket
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:23:35PM -0400, Bruce Momjian allegedly wrote:
> > > Thomas, will you be doing .pdf files? I have had requests to put that
> > > in the Debian documentation package.
> >
> > afaik, I don't have the means to generate pdf directly. Pointers would
> > be appreciated, if the
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 06:46:12PM +0300, Martín Marqués allegedly wrote:
> Why are you running configure inside src/? I'm not sure if the 7.0.x had the
> configure on the src/ dir or the root.
It's in the src dir with 7.0.x alright.
> You could take a look at 7.1RC[2-3], which looks pretty sta
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:56:27AM -0400, Tom Lane allegedly wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think we've got to remove that failing horology test before we wrap RC3.
>
> > can we comment out the test for now, so that its still
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 12:02:35PM +1200, Franck Martin allegedly wrote:
> I still don't see an entry for Linux 2.4.x
>
> Cheers.
This should fix that:
==
All 76 tests passed.
==
rm regress.o
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/exp/tmp/postgresql-7.1RC1/sr
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 03:17:06PM +, Thomas Lockhart allegedly wrote:
> And here are the up-to-date platforms; thanks for the reports:
> Solaris 2.7 Sparc 7.1 2001-03-22, Marc Fournier
Marc, was this done without unix sockets?
Mathijs
--
It's not that perl programmers are idiots, it's
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 11:07:25AM +0100, Pete Forman allegedly wrote:
> I've done a quick survey of the Suns available to me to see whether
> sendmail updates the ps display. The summary is:
>
>1) Require "/usr/ucb/ps w" at least. /usr/bin/ps has no options
> that I can find to displ
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 07:12:39PM -0500, Tom Lane allegedly wrote:
> Mathijs Brands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > mathijs297 0.1 0.2 6120 3352 pts/1S 01:59:18 0:00
>/opt/pgsql/bin/./postgres mathijs localhost template1 idle
>
> The interesting point about t
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 06:48:27PM -0500, Tom Lane allegedly wrote:
> Mathijs Brands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > PS_USE_CLOBBER_ARGV -is- used on Solaris. I just checked.
>
> Hm. But 7.1 postgres backends fail to change their ps display?
> Does sendmail change its ps
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 12:30:06AM +0200, Mathijs Brands allegedly wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 04:56:15PM -0500, Bruce Momjian allegedly wrote:
> > [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > > whats wrong with /usr/ucb/ps auxw | grep $PGUSER
> > >
>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 04:56:15PM -0500, Bruce Momjian allegedly wrote:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > whats wrong with /usr/ucb/ps auxw | grep $PGUSER
> >
> > to get only the processes for PG?
>
> I can do that if there is no other option, but on my BSDI machine,
> re
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 11:06:20AM -0400, The Hermit Hacker allegedly wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Robert E. Bruccoleri wrote:
> > Dear Marc,
> > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Robert E. Bruccoleri wrote:
> > >
> > > > I contributed the first working s_lock.c code for the SGI's over three
> > > > years a
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:40:00AM +0200, Mathijs Brands allegedly wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:17:47PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut allegedly wrote:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >
> > > Alexander Klimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Yes, it was reall
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:17:47PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut allegedly wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Alexander Klimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Yes, it was really just incidence -- I try again, and 15 of 15 `make
> > > check' passed with TCP sockets, but only 3 of 15 passed with UNIX
> >
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:34:13AM -0600, Brian P Millett allegedly wrote:
> ==
> All 76 tests passed.
> ==
>
> vlad: uname -a
> SunOS vlad 5.8 Generic_108528-06 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
>
> Reading specs from /opt/sfw/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 09:57:45AM -0500, Bruce Momjian allegedly wrote:
> We just fixed that yesterday. Can you grab the most recent CVS and give
> it a try?
Even if you fix this it won't work (I tried it). Robert mailed why. Check the URL below
for more information. It crashes on semctl :(
ht
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 08:59:45AM -0500, Robert E. Bruccoleri allegedly wrote:
> I contributed the first working s_lock.c code for the SGI's over three
> years ago (using the test_and_set library calls). It's been working
> for me ever since in a heavy multi-user environment. Please don't
> chang
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 06:36:37AM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain allegedly wrote:
> Thus spake Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
> > > We need some NetBSD folks to speak up!
>
> I have successfully compiled it from CVS sources on my NetBSD -current but
> I can't find the tar file for RC1 to try it with the package sy
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:09:38PM -0500, Tom Lane allegedly wrote:
> Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > That is not already available from the Irix support code?
>
> What we have for IRIX is
>
> #if defined(__sgi)
> /*
> * SGI IRIX 5
> * slock_t is defined as a unsigned long. We
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:01:24PM +1000, Justin Clift allegedly wrote:
> I know that Sourceforge has been adding all sorts of machines to their
> compile farm.
>
> Maybe it would be worthwhile taking a look if they have platforms we
> don't?
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
Compa
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:35:59PM -0500, Tom Lane allegedly wrote:
> Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Anyway, the last CVS update to port/ultrix.h that appears to have come
> >> from someone actually using Ultrix was rev 1.2 on 7-May-97, which
> >> predates the very existence of s
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:41:31PM -0500, Vince Vielhaber allegedly wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Mathijs Brands wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Is there a list somewhere listing the platforms 7.1 is being
> > tested on right now? I'd be able to run regression tests on
Hi
Is there a list somewhere listing the platforms 7.1 is being
tested on right now? I'd be able to run regression tests on
the following platforms, if necessary:
FreeBSD 3.3 (x86)
FreeBSD 4.2 (x86)
Linux (x86 - 2.2 & 2.4 kernels, Redhat & Debian distro's)
Solaris 7 (SPARC)
Solaris 8 (
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 10:01:37AM +0800, xuyifeng allegedly wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jaruwan Laongmal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 8:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS
Hello all,
I would like to thank Tom, Ian and the other pgsql wizards for their prompt
response. This must surely be open source at it's best :)
I've worked around the situation by running a small script that continually
monitors postgres and takes appropriate action if postgres shuts down. I'm
32 matches
Mail list logo
