Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 2:34 AM
> To: Amit Langote
> Cc: Amit Langote ; SPS ポクレ ヴィナヤック(
> 三技術) ; Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> ; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; SPS 坂野
> 昌平(三技術)
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PROPOSAL] V
Hi Amit,
Thank you for updating the patch.
> -Original Message-
> From: Amit Langote [mailto:langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 5:09 PM
> To: SPS ポクレ ヴィナヤック(三技術) ;
> robertmh...@gmail.com
> Cc: horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp; amitlangot...@gmail.com; pgsql-
>
Hi Amit,
Thank you for updating the patch.
> -Original Message-
> From: Amit Langote [mailto:langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:36 PM
> To: Robert Haas
> Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI ; Amit Langote
> ; SPS ポクレ ヴィナヤック(三技術)
> ; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; SPS 坂野 昌
Hi,
Thank you very much for committing this feature.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 2:17 AM
> To: Amit Langote
> Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI ; Amit Langote
> ; SPS ポクレ ヴィナヤック(三技術)
> ; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; SPS 坂野 昌
Hi Amit,
> -Original Message-
> From: Amit Langote [mailto:langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:29 PM
> To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> Cc: robertmh...@gmail.com; amitlangot...@gmail.com; SPS ポクレ ヴィ
> ナヤック(三技術) ; pgsql-
> hack...@postgresql.org; SPS 坂野 昌平(三技術)
> Sub
Hi Amit,
Thank you for updating the patch. I am testing it and I will try to improve it.
Regards,
Vinayak
> -Original Message-
> From: Amit Langote [mailto:amitlangot...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2016 4:41 PM
> To: Robert Haas
> Cc: SPS ポクレ ヴィナヤック(三技術) ;
> Amit Langote ; Kyo
Hello,
Thank you for your comments.
Please find attached patch addressing following comments.
>As I might have written upthread, transferring the whole string
>as a progress message is useless at least in this scenario. Since
>they are a set of fixed messages, each of them can be represented
>
Hello,
Please find attached updated patch.
>The point of having pgstat_report_progress_update_counter() is so that
>you can efficiently update a single counter without having to update
>everything, when only one counter has changed. But here you are
>calling this function a whole bunch of time
