Re: [CYGWIN] [HACKERS] Need for DLLINIT in Makefile.shlib

2004-10-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, I removed DLLINIT from Cygwin Makefile.shlib so it is now the same as Win32. I don't see any easy way to use ifeq to test multiple port strings so I didn't merge the duplicate Win32 and Cygwin Makefile actions. --- Rein

Re: [CYGWIN] [HACKERS] Need for DLLINIT in Makefile.shlib

2004-10-12 Thread Reini Urban
Jason Tishler schrieb: On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 01:37:48AM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: Bruce Momjian schrieb: I am curious why Cygwin needs DLLINIT in Makefile.shlib, and Win32 doesn't: [snip] The only difference I see is that Cygwin uses $(DLLINIT) while Win32 does not. Is that correct? Why

Re: [CYGWIN] [HACKERS] Need for DLLINIT in Makefile.shlib

2004-10-12 Thread Jason Tishler
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 01:37:48AM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: > Bruce Momjian schrieb: > >I am curious why Cygwin needs DLLINIT in Makefile.shlib, and Win32 > >doesn't: > > > > [snip] > > > >The only difference I see is that Cygwin uses $(DLLINIT) while Win32 > >does not. Is that correct? Why?