> On Friday 22 August 2003 13:59, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
>> >BTW any comments on storing an entire database in single file? I
>> >don't
>> > trust any file system for performance and data integrity if I have
>> > single 100GB file. I would rather have multiple of them..
On Friday 22 August 2003 13:59, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> >BTW any comments on storing an entire database in single file? I don't
> > trust any file system for performance and data integrity if I have single
> > 100GB file. I would rather have multiple of them..
>
> I don
Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
BTW any comments on storing an entire database in single file? I don't trust
any file system for performance and data integrity if I have single 100GB file.
I would rather have multiple of them..
I don't see why not. Entire file systems are stored within a single fi
On 21 Aug 2003 at 21:30, Manfred Koizar wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 15:05:52 +0200, I wrote:
> >>Just wondering, what other databases has transactable DDLs?
> >
> >Firebird.
>
> Stop! I withdraw that statement. I must have mis-read some feature
> list :-(
>
> Tests with InterBase 6 showed tha
On Thursday 21 August 2003 21:30, Manfred Koizar wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 15:05:52 +0200, I wrote:
> >>Just wondering, what other databases has transactable DDLs?
> >
> >Firebird.
>
> Stop! I withdraw that statement. I must have mis-read some feature
> list :-(
>
> Tests with InterBase 6 show
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 15:05:52 +0200, I wrote:
>>Just wondering, what other databases has transactable DDLs?
>
>Firebird.
Stop! I withdraw that statement. I must have mis-read some feature
list :-(
Tests with InterBase 6 showed that you can change metadata within a
transaction, but when you ROLLB
