Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg

2002-10-19 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@;sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: 19 October 2002 17:17 > To: Bruce Momjian > Cc: PostgreSQL-development > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >

Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg

2002-10-19 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am concerned that removing them may cause instability, particularly in > some of the java build scripts. That's why I am suggesting not doing it > during beta. Actually, it looks to me like they belong with the JDBC driver. As long as JDBC is in the

Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg

2002-10-18 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think we should move /contrib/retep to gborg. It is 400k and isn't > anywhere near our core functionality. I will add to TODO: > Move /contrib/retep to gborg > Can I move this during beta? I don't think so. Why not? Feature addition during be

[HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg

2002-10-18 Thread Bruce Momjian
I think we should move /contrib/retep to gborg. It is 400k and isn't anywhere near our core functionality. I will add to TODO: Move /contrib/retep to gborg Can I move this during beta? I don't think so. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PRO