Re: [HACKERS] [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions

2013-09-04 Thread MauMau
From: "Robert Haas" OK, patch committed and back-patched to 9.3. The patch file turned out to be sorta garbled. I'm not sure if a broken version of diff was used to generate this or whether MauMau hand-edited it after the fact, but the number of lines that were indicated in the control lines d

Re: [HACKERS] [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions

2013-09-03 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas escribió: > The patch file turned out to be sorta garbled. I'm not sure if a > broken version of diff was used to generate this or whether MauMau > hand-edited it after the fact, but the number of lines that were > indicated in the control lines didn't match the actual hunks, and > pa

Re: [HACKERS] [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions

2013-09-03 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Bjorn Munch wrote: > On 29/08 21.17, MauMau wrote: >> >> Thanks. I belive PostgreSQL runs successfully on Solaris 10 and later, >> because the binaries are published on the community site: >> >> http://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/binary/v9.3beta2/solaris/ > > Sorry, I

Re: [HACKERS] [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions

2013-08-30 Thread Bjorn Munch
On 29/08 21.17, MauMau wrote: > > Thanks. I belive PostgreSQL runs successfully on Solaris 10 and later, > because the binaries are published on the community site: > > http://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/binary/v9.3beta2/solaris/ Sorry, I didn't notice this thread earlier. Yes, I am building those b

Re: [HACKERS] [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions

2013-08-29 Thread MauMau
From: "Alvaro Herrera" Robert Haas escribió: Just because OpenSolaris is discontinued doesn't mean we don't support it. It looks like it has been unsupported for ~3 years at this point - not sure if that is long enough to remove the documentation reference. That part of the operating system

Re: [HACKERS] [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions

2013-08-26 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas escribió: > Just because OpenSolaris is discontinued doesn't mean we don't support > it. It looks like it has been unsupported for ~3 years at this point > - not sure if that is long enough to remove the documentation > reference. That part of the operating system ecosystem is messy,

Re: [HACKERS] [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions

2013-08-26 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:30 AM, MauMau wrote: > One of my colleagues, who is relatively new to PostgreSQL, asked me if > PostgreSQL supports Solaris 11. The reason why he had this question is that > the following page says "Solaris 10" instead of "Solaris 10 and later". > > http://www.postgresq

[HACKERS] [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions

2013-08-21 Thread MauMau
Hello, One of my colleagues, who is relatively new to PostgreSQL, asked me if PostgreSQL supports Solaris 11. The reason why he had this question is that the following page says "Solaris 10" instead of "Solaris 10 and later". http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/kernel-resources.html