Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@postgresql.org.pgsql-chat@post
Hey, this is exactly the sort of weird Cc: line I saw in the recent
spam surge. Since I suspect you are using the news server to post, I
suggest you take a long and careful look at the
On 17/01/2008, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@postgresql.org.pgsql-chat@post
Hey, this is exactly the sort of weird Cc: line I saw in the recent
spam surge. Since I suspect you are using the news server to
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Easiest fix: change the UID of the user running the postmaster (ie. pgsql)
so
that each runs as a distinct UID (instead of distinct PGPORT) ... been
doing
this since moving to FreeBSD 6.x ... no patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, January 17, 2008 13:58:36 + Dave Page
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 17/01/2008, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@postgresql.org.pgadmin-suppo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
Mischa Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If anyone is interested in creating hung backends, you can
create a named pipe, and tell the server to COPY from it.
That won't create a problematic situation though, until/unless you
SIGQUIT the parent postmaster.
Personally I think of this as what
Mischa Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm going to skip the kill(1,0) test and depend on nattch only,
with a function that PGSharedMemoryIsInUse() can also use.
(For a healthy server, nattch is never less than 2, right?)
Oh, forgot to mention: healthy servers are not the point here.
You
Quoting Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Easiest fix: change the UID of the user running the postmaster
(ie. pgsql) so
that each runs as a distinct UID (instead of distinct PGPORT) ...
been doing
this
Quoting Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mischa Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm going to skip the kill(1,0) test and depend on nattch only,
with a function that PGSharedMemoryIsInUse() can also use.
(For a healthy server, nattch is never less than 2, right?)
Oh, forgot to mention:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, January 17, 2008 01:12:54 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mischa Sandberg) writes:
Unfortunately, with multiple jails running PG servers and (due to app
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mischa Sandberg) writes:
Unfortunately, with multiple jails running PG servers and (due to app
limitations) all servers having same PGPORT, you get the situation that
when jail#2 (,jail#3,...) server comes up, it:
- detects that
10 matches
Mail list logo