Robert Haas wrote:
2009/1/10 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Uh, is this ready to be applied?
I don't think any consensus has been reached on changing this behavior.
I thing, so this is bug - RETURN QUERY has to supply FOR SELECT LOOP
RETURN
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
2009/1/10 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Uh, is this ready to be applied?
I don't think any consensus has been reached on changing this behavior.
I thing,
Hello
2009/1/10 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Uh, is this ready to be applied?
I don't think any consensus has been reached on changing this behavior.
regards, tom lane
I thing, so this is bug - RETURN QUERY has to supply FOR
2009/1/10 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Uh, is this ready to be applied?
I don't think any consensus has been reached on changing this behavior.
I thing, so this is bug - RETURN QUERY has to supply FOR SELECT LOOP
RETURN NEXT pattern.
My first patch
Pavel Stehule wrote:
My first patch expected so RETURN QUERY is final statement, so I don't
solve FOUND variable, but Heikki changed this behave.
Me? I don't recall doing anything related to this.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
2009/1/10 Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
My first patch expected so RETURN QUERY is final statement, so I don't
solve FOUND variable, but Heikki changed this behave.
Me? I don't recall doing anything related to this.
I have to look to archive,
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Uh, is this ready to be applied?
I don't think any consensus has been reached on changing this behavior.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
I am sending patch, that adds FOUND and GET DIAGNOSTICS support for
RETURN QUERY statement
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2008/11/10 Andrew Gierth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Pavel == Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, changing the semantics of an already-released statement
carries a risk of
