In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
(Bruce Momjian) transmitted:
Jan Wieck wrote:
We've been there before, and not only once. I wonder why we still find
more of these, because every time it comes up I agree to removal of it.
Perhaps your name
On 3/10/2006 10:53 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 3/8/2006 5:31 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
---
Remove Christof Petig copyright on include file, per author request.
Huh, I thought what he actually told was
On Friday 10 March 2006 07:53, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 3/8/2006 5:31 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
---
Remove Christof Petig copyright on include file, per author request.
Huh, I thought what he
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:31:47PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
We should not have individual copyrights to individuals in our source
tree. If Jan's is in there, it should be removed too (with his
approval). The only copyright holder should be PostgreSQL Global
Development Group.
Err, to do
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:31:47PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
The only copyright holder should be PostgreSQL Global
Development Group.
Err, to do that someone would need to collect copyright assignments (ie
signed documents) from every single
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
---
Remove Christof Petig copyright on include file, per author request.
Huh, I thought what he actually told was that the file was released
under BSD license. Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see him asking to
remove the copyright.
We certainly have
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
---
Remove Christof Petig copyright on include file, per author request.
Huh, I thought what he actually told was that the file was released
under BSD license. Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see him asking to
remove the
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
---
Remove Christof Petig copyright on include file, per author request.
Huh, I thought what he actually told was that the file was released
under BSD license. Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see him asking to
remove the
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
---
Remove Christof Petig copyright on include file, per author request.
Huh, I thought what he actually told was that the file was released
under BSD license. Maybe I missed it, but I didn't
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
---
Remove Christof Petig copyright on include file, per author request.
Huh, I thought what he actually told was that the file was released
under BSD license. Maybe I missed it, but I didn't
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Intended. None of the other include files in that directory had it.
Either all should, or none. Should we add it to all of them?
All. There's no good excuse for not having a version tag on every
source-code file. The contrib stuff is pretty bad
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 07:37:14PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On the $PostgreSQL$ issue, I think it's best to have the tag everywhere,
so if these files were the only ones that had it, I'd rather add them to
the rest ...
+1. I'd also argue that it should be in contrib as well.
I can submit
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
+1. I'd also argue that it should be in contrib as well.
I can submit a patch for contrib or the entire tree if desired.
Convention is that it goes near the top of the file, correct?
Correct.
--
Alvaro Herrera
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:27:23PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
+1. I'd also argue that it should be in contrib as well.
I can submit a patch for contrib or the entire tree if desired.
Convention is that it goes near the top of the file, correct?
Correct.
K,
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:27:23PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
+1. I'd also argue that it should be in contrib as well.
I can submit a patch for contrib or the entire tree if desired.
Convention is that it goes near the top of the
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Convention is that it goes near the top of the file, correct?
It goes at the bottom of the file header block comment ... if there
isn't a block comment at the start of the file, there should be. We
have a thousand or so examples to follow ;-)
16 matches
Mail list logo
