On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:05:11PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > >I've never been a fan of "regression tests" in the narrow sense of
> > >"let's test for this specific mistake we made once". If you can devise
> > >a test that catches a class of errors including
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:05, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > >I've never been a fan of "regression tests" in the narrow sense of
> > >"let's test for this specific mistake we made once". If you can devise
> > >a test that catches a class of errors including the o
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >I've never been a fan of "regression tests" in the narrow sense of
> >"let's test for this specific mistake we made once". If you can devise
> >a test that catches a class of errors including the one you actually
> >made, that's a different story, because it's muc
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wonder if there should be regression tests for all the bugs exposed
> after 8.1 ... I mean, what stops anyone from introducing the same bugs
> again?
I've never been a fan of "regression tests" in the narrow sense of
"let's test for this specific mist
Tom Lane wrote:
> Log Message:
> ---
> make_restrictinfo() failed to attach the specified required_relids to
> its result when the clause was an OR clause. Brain fade exposed by
> example from Sebastian B?ck.
I wonder if there should be regression tests for all the bugs exposed
after 8.1
