Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 18:13, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Kevin Grittner
wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I despaired of this repo being anything like reliable months ago.
AFAIK it is using a known to be broken version of fromcv
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 18:32, Kevin Grittner
wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> It would result in a massive merge commit and the duplication of
>> the entire history.
>
> Ah, well, if the two repositories don't share the same IDs, it a
> clear no-go. Now that I think about it, it would be a bit
Robert Haas wrote:
> It would result in a massive merge commit and the duplication of
> the entire history.
Ah, well, if the two repositories don't share the same IDs, it a
clear no-go. Now that I think about it, it would be a bit much to
expect those to match on independent conversions from
Kevin Grittner wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I despaired of this repo being anything like reliable months ago.
AFAIK it is using a known to be broken version of fromcvs.
Could we have it pull (using git) from the repo you have working
correctly? (Or would that be too Rube Goldber
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 18:13, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Kevin Grittner
> wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>> I despaired of this repo being anything like reliable months ago.
>>> AFAIK it is using a known to be broken version of fromcvs.
>>
>> Could we have it pu
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Kevin Grittner
wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> I despaired of this repo being anything like reliable months ago.
>> AFAIK it is using a known to be broken version of fromcvs.
>
> Could we have it pull (using git) from the repo you have working
> correctly? (
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I despaired of this repo being anything like reliable months ago.
> AFAIK it is using a known to be broken version of fromcvs.
Could we have it pull (using git) from the repo you have working
correctly? (Or would that be too Rube Goldbergesque?)
-Kevin
--
Sent via
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
---
pgindent run for 9.0, second run
It appears that the git mirror has deduced the wrong
contents for this commit. Apparently as a result, when I build from
git master, the dblink regress
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Log Message:
> ---
> pgindent run for 9.0, second run
It appears that the git mirror has deduced the wrong
contents for this commit. Apparently as a result, when I build from
git master, the dblink regression tests fail.
Can someon
