Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Spikewatch testing

2005-08-26 Thread Josh Berkus
Jim, > Can anyone step up for this now that things will hopefully calm down a > bit during beta? IIRC you just needed a commitment from a commiter, > right? Pretty much. Also, we need to write up test submission guidelines: basically just documentation on how to create a new regression test.

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Spikewatch testing

2005-08-26 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 01:49:34PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Jim, > > > Spikewatch is testing a number of different open-source components, > > including ours. If you click on a green datapoint, you can see what our > > actual code-coverage was for that test (presumably they're running the > > r

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Spikewatch testing

2005-08-26 Thread Chris Travers
Josh Berkus wrote: Is it worth trying to promote this as a way to promote PostgreSQL? Also, is it worth trying to improve our test coverage? Actually, they'll be running a contest (with prizes up to $2500) for improved test coverage for OSS applications. I've been trying to get some

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Spikewatch testing

2005-08-26 Thread Josh Berkus
Jim, > Spikewatch is testing a number of different open-source components, > including ours. If you click on a green datapoint, you can see what our > actual code-coverage was for that test (presumably they're running the > regression tests). Unfortunately, the banner ad I saw for them showed > My