Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-07 Thread Decibel!
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 03:55:14PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote: On Saturday 04 August 2007 09:45, Magnus Hagander wrote: Rohit Khare wrote: Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following features are expected in pgAdmin: (1) Facility to insert a column in between other

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-06 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Well, contributions come in many forms, not just patches. Note too that almost all the requested features had nothing to do with core postgres, which is what this list is about Well, as a driver developer I can tell you that the core teams attitude toward driver driven

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-06 Thread Robert Treat
On Saturday 04 August 2007 09:45, Magnus Hagander wrote: Rohit Khare wrote: Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following features are expected in pgAdmin: (1) Facility to insert a column in between other columns during table design. This I can see how people like, actually.

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-06 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Robert Treat wrote: On Saturday 04 August 2007 09:45, Magnus Hagander wrote: Rohit Khare wrote: Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following features are expected in pgAdmin: (1) Facility to insert a column in between other columns during table design. This I can

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-04 Thread Dave Page
Rohit Khare wrote: PostgreSQL has the oldest community of coders, and PostgreSQL itself is the oldest product. Still its performance (in some areas) and GUI does not match MySQL. MySQL .NET Driver gives very good performance for the MySQL Database, FireBird .NET Driver gives performance for

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-04 Thread Rohit Khare
Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following features are expected in pgAdmin: (1) Facility to insert a column in between other columns during table design. (2) Facility to view relationship diagram. (3) Facility to view table performance level graphically. (4) More documented

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-04 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Rohit Khare wrote: Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following features are expected in pgAdmin: (1) Facility to insert a column in between other columns during table design. (2) Facility to view relationship diagram. (3) Facility to view table performance level graphically.

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-04 Thread Magnus Hagander
Rohit Khare wrote: Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following features are expected in pgAdmin: (1) Facility to insert a column in between other columns during table design. This I can see how people like, actually. Theorists claim it's not needed since column order really

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-04 Thread Dave Page
--- Original Message --- From: Rohit Khare [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04/08/07, 12:58:25 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following features are expected in pgAdmin: I don't see what any of these have

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-04 Thread Neil Conway
On Sat, 2007-04-08 at 09:26 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: So what are *you* doing about it? This is open source, where if you want it and it's not there you make it. Otherwise you're just one more whinger wanting something for nothing. I don't agree with this attitude at all: we should be

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-04 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Neil Conway wrote: On Sat, 2007-04-08 at 09:26 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: So what are *you* doing about it? This is open source, where if you want it and it's not there you make it. Otherwise you're just one more whinger wanting something for nothing. I don't agree with this

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-04 Thread Rohit Khare
Comparing with MySQL/FireBird is not to be taken other-wise. Good things need to be taken care of if they can benefit users. Yes, it is open source and one can contribute code. But the level of expertise and skill also matters. PGSQL development community involve experts in the areas of RDBMS,

Res: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-03 Thread Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
@postgresql.org Cc: Andrei Kovalevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 2 de Agosto de 2007 12:49:56 Assunto: Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver On Thursday 02 August 2007 08:57, Andrei Kovalevski wrote: Merlin Moncure wrote: On 8/2/07, Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ühel kenal päeval

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-03 Thread Hiroshi Saito
Hi. Yeah, We have released Ver2.0 now. However, It is MS-VisualStudio and somewhat difficult. Then, Some change of ADO2.0(.NET2.0)... we want to clear a problem. However, It seems that very much time is required one by one. There is many expectations. :-) Regards, Hiroshi Saito - Original

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-03 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Frank Wiles wrote: ActiveState Perl is threaded and DBD::Pg works just fine with it. In fact, you don't need to build your own - just get the one from pgfoundry: And I've been using a threaded Perl on Linux/BSD systems for years. In fact, unless someone recompiles Perl every

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-03 Thread Frank Wiles
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:19:36 -0400 Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brar Piening wrote: Robert Treat schrieb: That would be nice. Of course none of this seems relevant to hackers, so I'd Your'e right - of course. But sometimes I wish 'hackers' would care a little more about

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-03 Thread Rohit Khare
PostgreSQL has the oldest community of coders, and PostgreSQL itself is the oldest product. Still its performance (in some areas) and GUI does not match MySQL. MySQL .NET Driver gives very good performance for the MySQL Database, FireBird .NET Driver gives performance for FireBird. Not only it is

[HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-02 Thread Rohit Khare
I used NPGSQL .NET driver to connect PGSQL 8.2.4 database to VB.NET. As stated on NPGSQL page, it doesn't seem to provide seamless integration and performance with .NET. Instead when I used ODBC, the performance was comparatively better. What's the reason? When can we expect .NET driver that

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-02 Thread Hannu Krosing
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2007-08-02 kell 11:24, kirjutas Rohit Khare: I used NPGSQL .NET driver to connect PGSQL 8.2.4 database to VB.NET. As stated on NPGSQL page, it doesn't seem to provide seamless integration and performance with .NET. Instead when I used ODBC, the performance was

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-02 Thread Merlin Moncure
On 8/2/07, Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2007-08-02 kell 11:24, kirjutas Rohit Khare: I used NPGSQL .NET driver to connect PGSQL 8.2.4 database to VB.NET. As stated on NPGSQL page, it doesn't seem to provide seamless integration and performance with .NET.

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-02 Thread Andrei Kovalevski
Merlin Moncure wrote: On 8/2/07, Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2007-08-02 kell 11:24, kirjutas Rohit Khare: I used NPGSQL .NET driver to connect PGSQL 8.2.4 database to VB.NET. As stated on NPGSQL page, it doesn't seem to provide seamless integration and

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-02 Thread Robert Treat
On Thursday 02 August 2007 08:57, Andrei Kovalevski wrote: Merlin Moncure wrote: On 8/2/07, Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2007-08-02 kell 11:24, kirjutas Rohit Khare: I used NPGSQL .NET driver to connect PGSQL 8.2.4 database to VB.NET. As stated on NPGSQL

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-02 Thread Brar Piening
Andrei Kovalevski schrieb: I have an experience with writing ODBC driver for PostgreSQL (https://projects.commandprompt.com/public/odbcng/). I would be happy to help community to improve .NET data provider. Please join the Npgsql Project at http://pgfoundry.org/projects/npgsql

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-02 Thread Brar Piening
Robert Treat schrieb: That would be nice. Of course none of this seems relevant to hackers, so I'd Your'e right - of course. But sometimes I wish 'hackers' would care a little more about their interfaces as the best backend can't be good without good interfaces and some of the

Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver

2007-08-02 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Brar Piening wrote: Robert Treat schrieb: That would be nice. Of course none of this seems relevant to hackers, so I'd Your'e right - of course. But sometimes I wish 'hackers' would care a little more about their interfaces as the best backend can't be good without good interfaces and