Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore additions

2013-01-24 Thread David Fetter
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:08:09AM +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Andrew Dunstan writes: > >>> tags > >>> /cscope.out > >>> > >> +1 on cscope.out! > > > > There doesn't seem anything postgres-specific about these. Pretty much > > everything we list is a byproduct of a standard build, not some ot

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore additions

2013-01-24 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Andrew Dunstan writes: >>> tags >>> /cscope.out >>> >> +1 on cscope.out! > > There doesn't seem anything postgres-specific about these. Pretty much > everything we list is a byproduct of a standard build, not some other tool. > "man gitignore" says You can use .git/info/exclude for a personal per

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore additions

2013-01-23 Thread Phil Sorber
On Jan 23, 2013 8:59 AM, "Andrew Dunstan" wrote: > > > On 01/23/2013 08:47 AM, Phil Sorber wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:32 AM, David Fetter wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:05:12PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: Hi all Would a committer be willing to pop some en

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore additions

2013-01-23 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 01/23/2013 08:47 AM, Phil Sorber wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:32 AM, David Fetter wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:05:12PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: Hi all Would a committer be willing to pop some entries in .gitignore for Windows native build outputs? *.sln *.vcproj *.vcxproj It'

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore additions

2013-01-23 Thread Phil Sorber
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:32 AM, David Fetter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:05:12PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Would a committer be willing to pop some entries in .gitignore for >> Windows native build outputs? >> >> *.sln >> *.vcproj >> *.vcxproj >> >> It'd make life easier

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore additions

2013-01-23 Thread Craig Ringer
On 01/23/2013 04:47 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >>> *.vcproj >>> *.vcxproj > > Actually, I see we already have the first pattern. So I've added the > second. > Great, thanks. Anchoring them is probably slightly safer, but I can't really imagine that ever being an issue for a pattern like *.vcxpr

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore additions

2013-01-23 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 01/23/2013 03:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 01/23/2013 12:05 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: Hi all Would a committer be willing to pop some entries in .gitignore for Windows native build outputs? *.sln We already exclude pgsql.sln - what others are built? None that I can see. *.vcproj *.

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore additions

2013-01-23 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 01/23/2013 12:05 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: Hi all Would a committer be willing to pop some entries in .gitignore for Windows native build outputs? *.sln We already exclude pgsql.sln - what others are built? None that I can see. *.vcproj *.vcxproj These all go in the top dir, no? So I th

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore additions

2013-01-22 Thread David Fetter
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:05:12PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > Hi all > > Would a committer be willing to pop some entries in .gitignore for > Windows native build outputs? > > *.sln > *.vcproj > *.vcxproj > > It'd make life easier when testing Windows changes. While they're at it, it'd be nic

[HACKERS] .gitignore additions

2013-01-22 Thread Craig Ringer
Hi all Would a committer be willing to pop some entries in .gitignore for Windows native build outputs? *.sln *.vcproj *.vcxproj It'd make life easier when testing Windows changes. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &