Christoph, what beta2 change was it that fixed that problem?
I'm having exactly the same regression test failure in version 10.1 (not beta)
running on Solaris 9
Compiler used: GCC 4.6.4
CFLAGS: -O2 -m64
On 13/07/2017 20:05, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: To Andres Freund 2017-05-24 <2017052417092
Re: To Andres Freund 2017-05-24 <20170524170921.7pykzbt54dlfk...@msg.df7cb.de>
> > > If we had a typo or something in that code, the build farm should have
> > > caught it by now.
> > >
> > > I would try compiling with lower -O and see what happens.
> >
> > Trying -O0 now.
>
> Sorry for the late
Re: To Andres Freund 2017-05-18 <20170518192924.jkrzevlencp3g...@msg.df7cb.de>
> > If we had a typo or something in that code, the build farm should have
> > caught it by now.
> >
> > I would try compiling with lower -O and see what happens.
>
> Trying -O0 now.
Sorry for the late reply, I was ho
Re: Peter Eisentraut 2017-05-18
<7a4d3b0f-78da-2a5b-7f3b-8b3509c1e...@2ndquadrant.com>
> If we had a typo or something in that code, the build farm should have
> caught it by now.
>
> I would try compiling with lower -O and see what happens.
Trying -O0 now.
Re: Andres Freund 2017-05-18 <2017051
On 5/18/17 10:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, that's just wacko. Somehow sequence.c's init_params() must
> be falling down on the job in selecting the right seqform->seqmin,
> but I'm darned if I see anything that's either wrong or potentially
> machine-dependent in that code. It almost looks like it
On 2017-05-18 10:11:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christoph Berg writes:
> > *** 34,44
> > --- 34,47
> > CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test7 AS bigint;
> > CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test8 AS integer MAXVALUE 10;
> > CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test9 AS integer INCREMENT BY -1;
> > + ERROR
Christoph Berg writes:
> *** 34,44
> --- 34,47
> CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test7 AS bigint;
> CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test8 AS integer MAXVALUE 10;
> CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test9 AS integer INCREMENT BY -1;
> + ERROR: MINVALUE (-9223372036854775808) is out of range for seque
Re: Tom Lane 2017-05-17 <30016.1495041...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Christoph Berg writes:
> > The sequence regression tests are failing on Debian/sparc64:
> > ...
> > (This is only the last 100 lines of regression.diffs, if it helps I
> > can try rebuilding and grabbing the full file.)
>
> Yes please.
Christoph Berg writes:
> The sequence regression tests are failing on Debian/sparc64:
> ...
> (This is only the last 100 lines of regression.diffs, if it helps I
> can try rebuilding and grabbing the full file.)
Yes please. What we can see here looks to be just fallout from
a failure earlier in
The sequence regression tests are failing on Debian/sparc64:
sequence ... FAILED
polymorphism ... ok
rowtypes ... ok
returning... ok
largeobject ... ok
with ... ok
xml
10 matches
Mail list logo
