Re: [HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-03 Thread Andrew Dunstan
I wrote: I started work today on a page that lists all the members. Now viewable here: http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_members.pl In due course, the branch names will be links to the build history. cheers andrew ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-03 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > TODO item? Sure: * ANALYZE should record a pg_statistic entry for an all-NULL column regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Mike Mascari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Will ANALYZE continue to ignore columns whose data is composed entirely > > of NULL in 8.0? > > I had hoped to get to this before RC, but it looks like it won't happen. > Considering I've just been beating up on Bruce for committing s

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-02 Thread Tom Lane
Mike Mascari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Will ANALYZE continue to ignore columns whose data is composed entirely > of NULL in 8.0? I had hoped to get to this before RC, but it looks like it won't happen. Considering I've just been beating up on Bruce for committing stuff that wasn't clearly a b

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-02 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: If you have something missing from here I'm especially interested in hearing from you. I think "Linux" entries are quite useless. We need to know what distribution (and version) it is. The kernel is actually a pretty uninteresting part of t

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > If you have something missing from here I'm especially interested in > hearing from you. I think "Linux" entries are quite useless. We need to know what distribution (and version) it is. The kernel is actually a pretty uninteresting part of the porting process. -- Pet

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane wrote: > We never really issued a "call for port reports" as has been past > practice. I think that Andrew Dunstan's build farm has partially > obsoleted that custom, but if you have access to a platform that > is not represented in the build farm, please do give it a try soon. The platf

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-02 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Travis P wrote: On Dec 2, 2004, at 5:44 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgbuildfarm/ I started work today on a page that lists all the members. Ah, good. I'm not seeing it immediately, but I'll keep my eye out. I've an AIX 5.1 system on which I could try to compile if y

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-02 Thread Travis P
On Dec 2, 2004, at 5:44 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgbuildfarm/ I started work today on a page that lists all the members. Ah, good. I'm not seeing it immediately, but I'll keep my eye out. I've an AIX 5.1 system on which I could try to compile if you don't have one

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-02 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Travis P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: What platforms are covered by the build farm? See http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl Also I think there is a gborg project page for it. s/gborg/pgfoundry/ http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgbuildfarm/ I started work today

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-02 Thread Tom Lane
Travis P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What platforms are covered by the build farm? See http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl Also I think there is a gborg project page for it. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-02 Thread Travis P
On Dec 2, 2004, at 11:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote: We never really issued a "call for port reports" as has been past practice. I think that Andrew Dunstan's build farm has partially obsoleted that custom, but if you have access to a platform that is not represented in the build farm, please do give it a

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-02 Thread Mike Mascari
Tom Lane wrote: The core committee has agreed that it's about time to advance to Release Candidate status (which we define as "code is frozen, but not docs nor message translation work"). Barring surprises, 8.0RC1 will be wrapped tomorrow (Friday). We never really issued a "call for port reports"

[HACKERS] 8.0RC1 tomorrow

2004-12-02 Thread Tom Lane
The core committee has agreed that it's about time to advance to Release Candidate status (which we define as "code is frozen, but not docs nor message translation work"). Barring surprises, 8.0RC1 will be wrapped tomorrow (Friday). We never really issued a "call for port reports" as has been pas