Hi,dear steven pgsql-hackers
I've encountered the similar phenonmenon with 9.4 .
1. environment
1.1 OS version
postgres@lhl-Latitude-E5420:~$ cat /etc/issue
Ubuntu 13.10 \n \l
postgres@lhl-Latitude-E5420:~$ uname -av
Linux lhl-Latitude-E5420 3.11.0-12-generic #19-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 9
=?utf-8?B?5p2O5rW36b6Z?= hailong...@qunar.com writes:
I have a PostgreSQL datadir named /export/pg94beta1_data/ which was
initialized with PostgreSQL 9.4beta1,
[ and 9.4beta2 won't start with it ]
This is expected; you need to initdb. Or use pg_upgrade to upgrade
the cluster. We had to
Understand!
Before I wrote last email, I had initialized a new db with PostgreSQL
9.4beta2 and restored the pg_dumpall data of /export/pg94beta1_data/
Thanks
Best Regards!
at 2014-07-28 00:35 +08, Tom Lane wrote:
=?utf-8?B?5p2O5rW36b6Z?= hailong...@qunar.com writes:
I have a PostgreSQL
On 07/27/2014 09:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?utf-8?B?5p2O5rW36b6Z?= hailong...@qunar.com writes:
I have a PostgreSQL datadir named /export/pg94beta1_data/ which was
initialized with PostgreSQL 9.4beta1,
[ and 9.4beta2 won't start with it ]
This is expected; you need to initdb. Or use
I've encountered a corrupt pg_control file on my 9.4 development
cluster. I've mostly been using the cluster for changeset extraction /
slony testing.
This is a 9.4 (currently commit 6ad903d70a440e + a walsender change
discussed in another thread) but would have had the initdb done with an
Steve Singer st...@ssinger.info writes:
I've encountered a corrupt pg_control file on my 9.4 development
cluster. I've mostly been using the cluster for changeset extraction /
slony testing.
This is a 9.4 (currently commit 6ad903d70a440e + a walsender change
discussed in another
On 07/08/2014 10:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Steve Singer st...@ssinger.info writes:
I've encountered a corrupt pg_control file on my 9.4 development
cluster. I've mostly been using the cluster for changeset extraction /
slony testing.
This is a 9.4 (currently commit 6ad903d70a440e + a walsender
Steve Singer st...@ssinger.info writes:
On 07/08/2014 10:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
There's no obvious reason to think that this pg_control file is corrupt
on its own terms, but the pg_controldata version you're using expects
the 942 layout. The fact that the server wasn't complaining about this