Thanks, patch applied.
---
Andrew Gierth wrote:
Bruce == Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
hi all,
I read the code that it seems easy for the cursor in plpgsql to
return ROW_COUNT after MOVE LAST etc.
Bruce == Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
hi all,
I read the code that it seems easy for the cursor in plpgsql to
return ROW_COUNT after MOVE LAST etc. The SPI_processed variable
already there, but didn't put it into estate structure, any reason
for that?
thanks and best
Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk writes:
GET DIAGNOSTICS ROW_COUNT is documented as working for all commands;
if it doesn't work for MOVE (and FETCH), that's a bug.
Or a documentation problem. I don't see any claim that it works for
all commands anyway.
Tom == Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk writes:
GET DIAGNOSTICS ROW_COUNT is documented as working for all commands;
if it doesn't work for MOVE (and FETCH), that's a bug.
Tom Or a documentation problem. I don't see any claim that it works
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 08:59:29PM +, Andrew Gierth wrote:
Tom == Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk writes:
GET DIAGNOSTICS ROW_COUNT is documented as working for all commands;
if it doesn't work for MOVE (and FETCH), that's a bug.
laser wrote:
hi all,
I read the code that it seems easy for the cursor in plpgsql to return
ROW_COUNT after
MOVE LAST etc. The SPI_processed variable already there, but didn't put
it into estate
structure, any reason for that?
thanks and best regards
Sorry, we have decided
laser wrote:
hi all,
I read the code that it seems easy for the cursor in plpgsql to return
ROW_COUNT after
MOVE LAST etc. The SPI_processed variable already there, but didn't put
it into estate
structure, any reason for that?
[ Sorry for the delay.]
Would some tests how Oracle
hi all,
I read the code that it seems easy for the cursor in plpgsql to return
ROW_COUNT after
MOVE LAST etc. The SPI_processed variable already there, but didn't put
it into estate
structure, any reason for that?
thanks and best regards
-laser
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list