Re: [HACKERS] Are these supported??

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > We've supported having joins in a DELETE since PostgreSQL 8.1. Er, yes. Though he does say he's trying to use the same syntax as select... -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: [HACKERS] Are these supported??

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Greg Stark wrote: > You can't have joins in a DELETE -- which table would it actually > delete from? You can use a subselect to do look up information from > other tables in your delete though. We've supported having joins in a DELETE since

Re: [HACKERS] Are these supported??

On 17 August 2016 at 11:33, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > I recently moved a mybb forum away from mysql to postgres. Along the way > I encountered a couple of things that either didn't seem to be supported or > I'm just not doing it right. First, the server this is on is

Re: [HACKERS] Are these supported??

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > I recently moved a mybb forum away from mysql to postgres. Along the way I > encountered a couple of things that either didn't seem to be supported or > I'm just not doing it right. > > First, the server this

[HACKERS] Are these supported??

Hi all, been awhile! Some may be saying "not long enough" but eh. I recently moved a mybb forum away from mysql to postgres. Along the way I encountered a couple of things that either didn't seem to be supported or I'm just not doing it right. First, the server this is on is running

Re: [HACKERS] PG 8.1 supported platforms list: IRIX is MIA

Gavin Sherry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I had a colleague test for me on his IRIX (6.5?) MIPSPRO machine. The following regression tests fail: http://treehou.se/~finn/regression.diffs Hm, looks like strtod() has some bizarre behavior for input infinity on that machine (NOT just failing to

Re: [HACKERS] PG 8.1 supported platforms list: IRIX is MIA

On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Tom Lane wrote: The 8.1 supported-platforms list is looking pretty good, I think -- we don't have updates for every single combination of OS and hardware, but we have updates for every OS and at least one instance of all supported CPU types. Except IRIX. There's been no

Re: [HACKERS] PG 8.1 supported platforms list: IRIX is MIA

On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Gavin Sherry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I had a colleague test for me on his IRIX (6.5?) MIPSPRO machine. The following regression tests fail: http://treehou.se/~finn/regression.diffs Hm, looks like strtod() has some bizarre behavior for input infinity

[HACKERS] PG 8.1 supported platforms list: IRIX is MIA

The 8.1 supported-platforms list is looking pretty good, I think -- we don't have updates for every single combination of OS and hardware, but we have updates for every OS and at least one instance of all supported CPU types. Except IRIX. There's been no port report since Robert Bruccoleri

Re: [HACKERS] PG 8.1 supported platforms list: IRIX is MIA

I don't know if this fills in any of the gaps, but... We passed regression tests with 8.1RC1 on dual hyperthreaded Xeon systems. One had SUSE 9.3 Professional; the other had Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition (Service Pack 1). Both had 8 GB RAM and six disk drives set up as RAID 5.

Re: [HACKERS] PG 8.1 supported platforms list

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes: The 8.1 supported-platforms list is looking pretty good, I think -- we don't have updates for every single combination of OS and hardware, but we have updates for every OS and at least one instance of all supported CPU types. Not to pester overly... AIX

Re: [HACKERS] PG 8.1 supported platforms list

Chris Browne wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes: The 8.1 supported-platforms list is looking pretty good, I think -- we don't have updates for every single combination of OS and hardware, but we have updates for every OS and at least one instance of all supported CPU types. Not

Re: [HACKERS] PG 8.1 supported platforms list: IRIX is MIA

Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Can anyone test 8.1RC1 on IRIX? On a separate matter, I did a simple regression (--enable-cassert) of cvs tip on SunOS 5.8, seems no problem. I found the only thing related in our document is that SunOS 4 is not supported in 2001. Shall we add something in

[HACKERS] Update for supported platforms list

Hi, All regression tests passed on : * SUSE LINUX 10.0 (i586) OSS * Fedora Core release 4 * Red Hat Linux release 9 * Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 6) Both are x86. Regards, -- Devrim GUNDUZ Kivi Bilişim Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr devrim~gunduz.org,

[HACKERS] SCO Openserver supported in 7.3.1

I have worked with Shibashish Satpathy to add support for SCO Openserver 5.0.4 using gcc in 7.3.1. The port was accomplished via a small change to template/sco. Seeing as it was an unsupported platform, this is a no-risk change, because now it _does_ work. -- Bruce Momjian

Re: [HACKERS] SCO Openserver supported in 7.3.1

Bruce Momjian wrote: I have worked with Shibashish Satpathy to add support for SCO Openserver 5.0.4 using gcc in 7.3.1. The port was accomplished via a small change to template/sco. Seeing as it was an unsupported platform, this is a no-risk change, because now it _does_ work. Let me add

Re: [CYGWIN] [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

This post is just for closure -- both of the issues below have been resolved: On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:47:35AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: 1. Cygwin bison needs to be upgraded from 1.35 to 1.75 (i.e., 1.50+) to process src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.y successfully. I will post to

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 00:40, Bruce Momjian wrote: Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html Please note that you have an entry for Digital Unix and one for Compaq Tru64 while in fact they are the same OS that went through a whirlwind of

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 05 November 2002 03:18 To: Sean Chittenden Cc: Tom Lane; Larry Rosenman; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Ports list updated: http

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 05 November 2002 03:18 To: Sean Chittenden Cc: Tom Lane; Larry Rosenman; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Ports list

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Yes, now it is Digital/HP/Compaq. Updated to existing Tru64 entry. Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Alessio Bragadini wrote: On Tue, 2002-11-05 at

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:22:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: I've committed fixes for the other issues too, so CVS tip should now pass cleanly on your platform. I've built the snapshot from CVS tip and now the regression tests pass with both GCC 2.95.1 and Compaq C V6.4-216 (dtk) on Digital UNIX

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Sean Chittenden wrote: Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I can tell without testing, the

Re: [CYGWIN] [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Peter, On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 07:36:40PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Dave Page writes: Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the binary distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to be listed as supported if no-one disagrees... I disagree. We

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Alessio Bragadini wrote: On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:22:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: I've committed fixes for the other

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I can tell without testing, the above scrap of resultmap code is wrong because both of the i.86 lines will match on FreeBSD 4.7, and I think the pg_regress coding will take the last match. Larry, did you actually test the

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 18:53, Tom Lane wrote: Evidently main.c needs #include errno.h added. I wonder what have changed since Beta2 that compiled fine... Please add that and see if you get any further. Done, and now it builds (I've limited the test to native cc compiler for now). But it

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Alessio Bragadini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 18:53, Tom Lane wrote: Evidently main.c needs #include errno.h added. I wonder what have changed since Beta2 that compiled fine... That is odd. main.c itself certainly has not changed. Done, and now it builds (I've limited

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

I said: The alter_table diff is clearly indicative of a bug. Can you set a breakpoint and discover exactly where calloc is blowing up? Never mind, I see it: psql is doing calloc(0) when presented with a table of zero columns. Surprising you're the first to try it on a platform where that

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 01:57, Sean Chittenden wrote: Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The supported platforms list hasn't been touched ... Good point. Thomas, can you take that on? No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Sean Chittenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: $ uname -a FreeBSD avienda.nxad.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Oct 28 18:20:14 PST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLAPTOP i386 Looks like the only problem on beta3 is that the geometry bits are failing, but I'm not

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 09:53, Tom Lane wrote: Sean Chittenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: $ uname -a FreeBSD avienda.nxad.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Oct 28 18:20:14 PST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLAPTOP i386 Looks like the only problem on beta3 is

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 09:53, Tom Lane wrote: Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I can tell without testing, the above scrap of resultmap code is wrong because both of the i.86 lines will match on FreeBSD 4.7, and I think the

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. DOESN'T WORK on Digital Unix/Tru64 4.0g, with both cc or gcc compiler. Using Compaq C V6.4-216 (dtk) on Digital UNIX V4.0G (Rev. 1530) Compiler Driver V6.4-013 (dtk) cc Driver: make[3]: Entering directory

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Alessio Bragadini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. DOESN'T WORK on Digital Unix/Tru64 4.0g, with both cc or gcc compiler. Evidently main.c needs #include errno.h added. Please add that and see if you get any further.

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The supported platforms list hasn't been touched ... Good point. Thomas, can you take that on? No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the mailing lists, and so can not coordinate anything :( Not

Re: [CYGWIN] [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Dave Page writes: Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the binary distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to be listed as supported if no-one disagrees... I disagree. We document as supported those platforms that build out of the box, not those that

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Bruce, Not sure. I know Tom Lane ran a check on 10.1.x and didn't have any errors, so I figured the differences I saw reflected changes made by Apple between 10.1.x and 10.2.x. Then, I was surprised when I saw Adam's report, so I thought perhaps he was running on a PPC G3 and there were

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On 29/10/02 1:50 pm, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Strange. I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying regression tests passed: 10.2.1, Adam Witney ([EMAIL PROTECTED] The proper value seems to be: 15.3864610140472 or

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

I have reviewed your diff and found that it was either timezone changes or join.sql which I have recently fixed. Can you grab current CVS snapshot and try again? --- Ian Barwick wrote: On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:56,

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I would try to compile myself just to be sure, but I received 4 failures: horology,geometry,opr_sanity, and misc This is

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 12:16, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote: Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I would try to compile myself just to be sure, but I received 4

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

[mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 29 October 2002 14:48 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms I found a solution to the above which will hopefully find its way

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:56, Bruce Momjian wrote: Sorry, Ian, here is the patch I applied. You can apply this to whatever version you are using and test Irix with that, rather than having to grab CVS. OK, I have carried out make check with the updated tests but got FAILED on the same

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 29 October 2002 04:24 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms I have updated CVS and re-added getopt.c, now

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Strange. I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying regression tests passed: 10.2.1, Adam Witney ([EMAIL PROTECTED] The proper value seems to be: 15.3864610140472 or 15.3864610140473 in

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Matthew, On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:50:40PM -0500, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: Are you compiling from CVS or from a released tarball? CVS. The bison requirement was recently raised to bison 1.5 or above (1.75 was recently released also.) This is an issue only when compiling from CVS, since

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I would try to compile myself just to be sure, but I received 4 failures: horology,geometry,opr_sanity, and misc This is on alpha running debian 3 linux uname

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

-Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 29 October 2002 14:48 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms I found a solution

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

-Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Hackers: As the Cygwin

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 29 October 2002 19:34 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Attached is a diff to fix the pclose problem

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Dave, On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:00:20PM -, Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58 Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the binary distribution that Jason builds, I would

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. I've checked CVS tip on: HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc PPC Linux Mac OS X 10.1 Here's the regression.diffs file from Mac OS X 10.2.1 (Jaguar). It failed

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:32:04PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote: Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 2.5 Gig, gcc 2.95.3; all tests pass. Solaris 8 forthcoming. I should have mentioned that this is for beta 3; I don't have the necessary bison installed to compile from CVS. Solaris 8,

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17 To: PostgreSQL-development Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17 To: PostgreSQL-development Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Dave, Thanks for the heads up... On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:31:00AM -, Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17 Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Folks. start sending in those

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

I thought the join was part of the timezone change, but I see now that it is separate. I will fix it by adding ORDER BY. --- Neil Conway wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ports list updated: Shouldn't

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

-Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 28 October 2002 13:33 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Dave, Thanks

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Make installcheck also failed on horology, copy2 and domain - see attached output. The clocks changed here on Saturday night, so I guess that shouldn't have caused the first error (or should the docs be updated?). Horology failures are normal for a day or so on either side of a DST change

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl;sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: 28 October 2002 15:53 To: Jason Tishler Cc: Dave Page; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Make installcheck also

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Dave, On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:01PM -, Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 28 October 2002 13:33 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Please try with Cygwin 1.3.14-1 while I attempt to deal

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 10:20, Jason Tishler wrote: 2. Cygwin bison limit exceeded: make[4]: Entering directory `/home/jt/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc' [snip] bison -y -d preproc.y preproc.y:5560: fatal error: maximum table size (32767) exceeded I believe a new

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Horology failures are normal for a day or so on either side of a DST change --- see the regression tests interpretation docs. I have no time right now to examine the other diffs. The docs say: Some of the queries in the timestamp test will fail if you

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Dave, On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:20:16AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:01PM -, Dave Page wrote: Ok, but this is going to take a while as few of the mirrors seem to have this release yet. I also need to download a new set of everything for reasons I won't go

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

-Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 28 October 2002 20:42 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Dave, On Mon, Oct 28

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 14:58, Dave Page wrote: My WAG is that you will be able to upgrade your Cygwin installation before I fix the Cygwin build issues. :,) I guess my WAG was wrong... :,) I've been meaning to ask this for a while - what exactly is a WAG? :-) Wild-A**ed-Guess, I

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it. Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 2.5 Gig, gcc 2.95.3; all tests pass. Solaris

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Neil Conway wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ports list updated: Shouldn't the join regression test failure be fixed? OK, I have updated the join regression test to add ORDER BY in the queries Irix differed. Ian, would you retest the CVS version of PostgreSQL to see if all

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Tuesday 29 October 2002 00:08, Bruce Momjian wrote: Neil Conway wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ports list updated: Shouldn't the join regression test failure be fixed? OK, I have updated the join regression test to add ORDER BY in the queries Irix differed. Ian,

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Sorry, Ian, here is the patch I applied. You can apply this to whatever version you are using and test Irix with that, rather than having to grab CVS. --- Neil Conway wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ports

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Andrew Sullivan wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: OK, Tom will be away next week,

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Andrew Sullivan wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:32:04PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote: Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Linux alpha. An Redhat 6.2, Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002 alpha unknown (ev56 ruffian). gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) ./configure \ --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql-7.3b3 \ --with-maxbackends=512 \ --with-tcl \ --without-tk

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote: Linux alpha. An Redhat 6.2, Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002 alpha

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC9 1.3.10(0.51/3/2) 2002-02-25 11:14 i686 unknown ^^ Please try with Cygwin 1.3.14-1 while I attempt to deal with at least

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

October 2002 03:17 To: PostgreSQL-development Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. Windows XP Professional SP1 Client build fails :-( Regards, Dave

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Saturday 26 October 2002 04:17, Bruce Momjian wrote: OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it. Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. The current platform list is:

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Ian Barwick wrote: On Saturday 26 October 2002 04:17, Bruce Momjian wrote: OK, Tom will be away next week, and

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ports list updated: Shouldn't the join regression test failure be fixed? Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On an rh6.2, Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002 alpha unknown (ev56 ruffian) i get this failure. Should ./configure options gmake gmake check be the only things i need to do? == creating database regression ==

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Doug McNaught wrote: Doug McNaught [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, compile went fine, but I get multiple regression test failures:

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 04:01:17PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: Updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html Linux 2.4 on IA32 passes also. -- Alvaro Herrera (alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl) La felicidad no es mañana. La felicidad es ahora

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Alvaro Herrera wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 04:01:17PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: Updated:

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. I've checked CVS tip on: HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc PPC Linux Mac OS X 10.1 I get the

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Doug McNaught [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic' gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic -I../../../../../../src/include -c -o ascii_and_mic.o ascii_and_mic.c

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Doug McNaught [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic' gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic -I../../../../../../src/include -c -o

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version number please. I've checked CVS tip on: HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc PPC Linux Mac OS X 10.1 regards, tom lane

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

On 26 Oct 2002, Doug McNaught wrote: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Doug McNaught [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic' gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Doug McNaught [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, compile went fine, but I get multiple regression test failures: test geometry ... FAILED After realizing that my disk had filled up (thanks Alvaro) I reran the tests and 'geometry' is the only failure. I'm guessing this is due to

[HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

Thomas Lockhart wrote: Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The supported platforms list hasn't been touched ... Good point. Thomas, can you take that on? No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the mailing lists, and so can not coordinate