On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 06:29:51PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am not sure what can be done to solve this in the future. There
are only a limited number of us who have the experience and time to
review and comment on very complex patches.
The issue as I see it
One failing that has appeared during the 7.5 development cycle is that
we as a community haven't been able to provide timely feedback to
developers working on large feature additions.
I am particularly thinking of Alvaro (nested transactions) and Simon
(PITR), where we haven't been able to give
One failing that has appeared during the 7.5 development cycle is that
we as a community haven't been able to provide timely feedback to
developers working on large feature additions.
I am particularly thinking of Alvaro (nested transactions) and Simon
(PITR), where we haven't been able to give
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
One failing that has appeared during the 7.5 development cycle is that
we as a community haven't been able to provide timely feedback to
developers working on large feature additions.
I am particularly thinking of Alvaro (nested transactions) and Simon
On Jul 13, 2004, at 17:02, Bruce Momjian wrote:
One failing that has appeared during the 7.5 development cycle is that
we as a community haven't been able to provide timely feedback to
developers working on large feature additions.
I am particularly thinking of Alvaro (nested transactions) and
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am not sure what can be done to solve this in the future. There
are only a limited number of us who have the experience and time to
review and comment on very complex patches.
The issue as I see it is not reviewing patches, but defining features.
Someone sets out to
Chris, all:
Well, I note (and I'm not being unkind or anything here) that a lot of
the high level committers we have haven't been so active this release.
Peter and Joe haven't been around much and Jan has been busy with Slony.
We also lost Thomas Lockhart. Neil's also away on holidays.
Josh Berkus wrote:
Chris, all:
Well, I note (and I'm not being unkind or anything here) that a lot of
the high level committers we have haven't been so active this release.
Peter and Joe haven't been around much and Jan has been busy with Slony.
We also lost Thomas Lockhart. Neil's
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The issue as I see it is not reviewing patches, but defining features.
Someone sets out to develop nested transactions, and three days after
feature freeze we have the first large discussion about what nested
transactions really are, what they are
Bruce Momjian wrote:
The result is that we chronically have less manpower when just when we need
everybody. And some of us end up spending 11 hours a day in front of the
screen when we should be outside soaking up Vitamin D.
Therefore, I propose that the next version either feature
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
True, but northern-hemisphere summer is only 6 weeks old, and we have
had these issues for many months --- it isn't a new problem. Alvaro
didn't get the feedback he needed in March either. :-(
This is true, but Josh does have a point ... you took a
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
True, but northern-hemisphere summer is only 6 weeks old, and we have
had these issues for many months --- it isn't a new problem. Alvaro
didn't get the feedback he needed in March either. :-(
This is true, but Josh
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
True, but northern-hemisphere summer is only 6 weeks old, and we have
had these issues for many months --- it isn't a new problem. Alvaro
didn't get the feedback he needed in March either.
Josh Berkus wrote:
( This is
probably why many American corporations end their fiscal year in
midsummer; nothing is going to get done anyway, might as well clean
up. )
And that is also the time when volunteers will have the most time to
spare.
--
Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Well, I note (and I'm not being unkind or anything here) that a lot of
the high level committers we have haven't been so active this release.
Peter and Joe haven't been around much and Jan has been busy with Slony.
I think this is (in part at
Joe Conway wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Well, I note (and I'm not being unkind or anything here) that a lot of
the high level committers we have haven't been so active this release.
Peter and Joe haven't been around much and Jan has been busy with Slony.
I
16 matches
Mail list logo
