"Ioseph Kim" wrote:
> CP51949 is EUC-KR correct.
> >{PG_EUC_KR, "CP51949"}, /* or 20949 ? */
Thank you for the information. I removed "or 20949 ?" from the line.
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgres
ro Itagaki"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:27 PM
Subject: [HACKERS] CP949 for EUC-KR?
>I heard pg_get_encoding_from_locale() failed in kor locale.
>
>WARNING: could not determine encoding for locale "kor": codeset is "CP949"
>
> I found the foll
Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
> That's it! We should have added an additional alias to chklocale, too.
>
> Index: src/port/chklocale.c
> ===
> --- src/port/chklocale.c (HEAD)
> +++ src/port/chklocale.c (fixed)
> @@ -172,6 +172,7 @
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > Should we add (or replace) CP949 for EUC-KR?
>
> No. CP949 is not plain EUC-KR, but EUC-KR with some extensions (UHC). At
> least on CVS HEAD, we recognize CP949 as an alias for the PostgreSQL
> PG_UHC encoding.
That's it! We should have added an additional alias
Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
> I heard pg_get_encoding_from_locale() failed in kor locale.
>
> WARNING: could not determine encoding for locale "kor": codeset is
> "CP949"
>
> I found the following description in the web:
> CP949 is EUC-KR, extended with UHC (Unified Hangul Code).
>
> h
I heard pg_get_encoding_from_locale() failed in kor locale.
WARNING: could not determine encoding for locale "kor": codeset is "CP949"
I found the following description in the web:
CP949 is EUC-KR, extended with UHC (Unified Hangul Code).
http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/libic
