Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2004-10-22 Thread Dennis Bjorklund
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > The repository path was changed from /cvsroot/pgsql-server to > /cvsroot/pgsql some time ago. You'll have to re-checkout or fix the > CVS/Repository file in each subdirectory in your checked-out copy. Oh. Thanks! I should have tried, but in the p

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2004-10-22 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Dennis Bjorklund wrote: I'm having problems with cvs: cvs diff: failed to create lock directory for `/cvsroot/pgsql-server' (/cvsroot/pgsql-server/#cvs.lock): No such file or directory cvs diff: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/cvsroot/pgsql-server' cvs [diff aborted]

[HACKERS] cvs problem

2004-10-22 Thread Dennis Bjorklund
I'm having problems with cvs: cvs diff: failed to create lock directory for `/cvsroot/pgsql-server' (/cvsroot/pgsql-server/#cvs.lock): No such file or directory cvs diff: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/cvsroot/pgsql-server' cvs [diff aborted]: read lock failed - giving up -- /Dennis

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2003-07-24 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:53:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On a different note, I also wonder about: > > > > M src/backend/parser/gram.c > > > > It seems that you checkout the source with no gram.c. Build it, thus creating > > gram.c. Next time you

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2003-07-23 Thread Tom Lane
Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On a different note, I also wonder about: > > M src/backend/parser/gram.c > > It seems that you checkout the source with no gram.c. Build it, thus creating > gram.c. Next time you cvs update, you get Attic/gram.c merged in :/ - or is > my use of cvs in

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2003-07-23 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:34:04AM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > try it now ... I think its a pathing problem with a cron entry ... just > fixed that, so should be okay now ... ... > > cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up Yup - that's all fine thanks! > > On a different note

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2003-07-23 Thread The Hermit Hacker
try it now ... I think its a pathing problem with a cron entry ... just fixed that, so should be okay now ... On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Patrick Welche wrote: > cvs server: Updating src/bin/scripts/po > cvs server: failed to create lock directory for > `/projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/bin/scripts/

[HACKERS] cvs problem

2003-07-23 Thread Patrick Welche
cvs server: Updating src/bin/scripts/po cvs server: failed to create lock directory for `/projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/bin/scripts/po' (/projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/bin/scripts/po/#cvs.lock): Permission denied cvs server: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/projects/cvsroot/pgsq

Re: Temprary issue gripes(was:Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem)

2001-10-10 Thread Lamar Owen
On Monday 08 October 2001 09:37 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > I don't see for whom the long name would be a problem; certainly if > it has been that way for five years, it couldn't have been a serious > problem. Ask Marc why he changed it. > > > > Correction: Marc Fournier controls the entire di

Re: Temprary issue gripes(was:Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem)

2001-10-09 Thread John Summerfield
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Friday 05 October 2001 07:48 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > > I made it clear I was getting frustrated. Read in that context, I think it > > was pretty mild;-) > > But it was done in an uninformed way. Had you

Temprary issue gripes(was:Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem)

2001-10-08 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday 05 October 2001 07:48 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > I made it clear I was getting frustrated. Read in that context, I think it > was pretty mild;-) But it was done in an uninformed way. Had you read the previous two-three weeks of the archives,

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-05 Thread John Summerfield
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, John Summerfield wrote: > > > I don't think I was being rude. It's true I'm no diplomat. I've > > criticised actions (and, I think, with considerable justice), but I've > > not actually criticised people. > > How can your criticis

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-05 Thread John Summerfield
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Thursday 04 October 2001 09:40 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > > Well, remember I only arrived here in the past two weeks. What I've seen > > has not been reassuring. > > May I be so bold as to suggest your taking a few hours of your time and > reading th

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-05 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday 04 October 2001 09:40 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > Well, remember I only arrived here in the past two weeks. What I've seen > has not been reassuring. May I be so bold as to suggest your taking a few hours of your time and reading the last six months to a year of the list's archives

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, John Summerfield wrote: > On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Stephan Szabo wrote: > > > > of the message this was in response to which appears to be what Lamar was > > responding to. Besides, there's a far cry from a message of constructive > > criticism and the message this was in response

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, John Summerfield wrote: > I don't think I was being rude. It's true I'm no diplomat. I've > criticised actions (and, I think, with considerable justice), but I've > not actually criticised people. How can your criticisms be 'with considerable justice' (justification?) when yo

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-04 Thread John Summerfield
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Wednesday 03 October 2001 07:53 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > > > On Monday 01 October 2001 07:33 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > > > > Time to get your act together fellas. > > > > This is open source John, not r

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-04 Thread John Summerfield
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Stephan Szabo wrote: > of the message this was in response to which appears to be what Lamar was > responding to. Besides, there's a far cry from a message of constructive > criticism and the message this was in response to. The point that the > documentation and reality ne

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-04 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 07:53 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > > On Monday 01 October 2001 07:33 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > > > Time to get your act together fellas. > > This is open source John, not rocket science. (pun intended) > Hmm. Kids I was at

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-04 Thread Thomas Lockhart
... > I hope you're in better shape by beta time. Hi John. I would highly recommend taking a deep breath and coming back in a couple of weeks. Things should have settled down by then and we will have returned to your high standards of service and support. In the meantime, folks are busy getting u

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Changing the CVS repository so it doesn't work the same way any > more isn't smart. Having wrong documentation isn't smart. Taking > two weeks and NOT fixing a simple problem isn't smart. Giving > wrong advice isn't smart. Test your advice - where possible I > do. I will consider this point val

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-04 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, John Summerfield wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > > > > On Monday 01 October 2001 07:33 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > > > It seems you don't have to be new here to be a bit peeved about things;-( > > [snip] > > > Time to get your act together fellas. > > > >

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-04 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, John Summerfield wrote: > I know I'm not well-known here, but I've made my contributions in other arenas where >I'm stronger. > > PG isn't perfect - we all know that. Nor is the project administration. When there's >a problem identified, someone has to take responsibility fo

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-04 Thread John Summerfield
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Monday 01 October 2001 07:33 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > > It seems you don't have to be new here to be a bit peeved about things;-( > [snip] > > Time to get your act together fellas. > > This is open source John, not rocket science. (pun intended) H

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-04 Thread John Summerfield
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, John Summerfield wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > The one thing I can't check is the anoncvs directory. Not sure if that > > > > is the same as the CV

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-02 Thread Lamar Owen
On Monday 01 October 2001 07:33 pm, John Summerfield wrote: > It seems you don't have to be new here to be a bit peeved about things;-( [snip] > Time to get your act together fellas. This is open source John, not rocket science. (pun intended) Lighten up. The release will happen, regardless of

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, John Summerfield wrote: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The one thing I can't check is the anoncvs directory. Not sure if that > > > is the same as the CVS directory. > > > > It is the anoncvs server that's broken.

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-02 Thread John Summerfield
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Marc, > > > > it worked, but now I'm again getting: > > > > cvs server: failed to create lock directory for >/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/expected' >(/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/expected/#cvs.lock): Permission denied > > cvs

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-02 Thread John Summerfield
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The one thing I can't check is the anoncvs directory. Not sure if that > > is the same as the CVS directory. > > It is the anoncvs server that's broken. The committers don't seem to be > having any problem with

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-01 Thread Sean Chittenden
> > The one thing I can't check is the anoncvs directory. Not sure if that > > is the same as the CVS directory. > > It is the anoncvs server that's broken. The committers don't seem to be > having any problem with accesses to the primary server. I suspect that > there's a umask or group-membe

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-01 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The one thing I can't check is the anoncvs directory. Not sure if that > is the same as the CVS directory. It is the anoncvs server that's broken. The committers don't seem to be having any problem with accesses to the primary server. I suspect that

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
> > > Those are directories I just created. They have the same permission as > > all the other files here. Maybe there is a problem with CVS server > > creating stuff with the wrong permission. > > >From my experience, it is likely that you have a umask problem. Or there > is some other read/w

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
> > > Those are directories I just created. They have the same permission as > > all the other files here. Maybe there is a problem with CVS server > > creating stuff with the wrong permission. > > >From my experience, it is likely that you have a umask problem. Or there > is some other read/w

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-01 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> Those are directories I just created. They have the same permission as > all the other files here. Maybe there is a problem with CVS server > creating stuff with the wrong permission. >From my experience, it is likely that you have a umask problem. Or there is some other read/write permissio

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-01 Thread Bill Studenmund
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Marc, > > > > it worked, but now I'm again getting: > > > > cvs server: failed to create lock directory for >/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/expected' >(/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/expected/#cvs.lock): Permission denied > > cvs

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Marc, > > it worked, but now I'm again getting: > > cvs server: failed to create lock directory for >/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/expected' >(/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/expected/#cvs.lock): Permission denied > cvs server: failed to obtain dir lock in repository >/p

[HACKERS] CVS problem

2001-10-01 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
I can't do `cvs update -d -P'. I get the following error: cvs server: failed to create lock directory for `/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/expected' (/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/expected/#cvs.lock): Permission denied cvs server: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-01 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Marc, it worked, but now I'm again getting: cvs server: failed to create lock directory for /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/expected' (/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgcrypto/expected/#cvs.lock): Permission denied cvs server: failed to obtain dir lock in repository /projects/cvsroot

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-01 Thread Marc G. Fournier
should be fixed now ... On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > Marc, > > what's happens with cvs ? I still can't update: > > cvs server: failed to create lock directory for >/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgstattuple' >(/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgstattuple/#cvs.lock): Permission

Re: [HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-01 Thread Tom Lane
Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > what's happens with cvs ? I still can't update: > cvs server: failed to create lock directory for >/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgstattuple' >(/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgstattuple/#cvs.lock): Permission denied > cvs server: failed to obtain

[HACKERS] cvs problem

2001-10-01 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Marc, what's happens with cvs ? I still can't update: cvs server: failed to create lock directory for /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgstattuple' (/projects/cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pgstattuple/#cvs.lock): Permission denied cvs server: failed to obtain dir lock in repository /projects/cvsroot/p

Re: [HACKERS] CVS problem

2000-11-07 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 08:59:38AM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > what version of CVS are you running? when was the last time you did > anything with it? It works again. I have no idea what failed. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linu

Re: [HACKERS] CVS problem

2000-11-06 Thread The Hermit Hacker
what version of CVS are you running? when was the last time you did anything with it? cvs on hub hasn't been upgraded since Sept 13th, so it isn't an upgrade issue ... and just tested from work, and I can checkout no probs ... On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Michael Meskes wrote: > Here's what I get

[HACKERS] CVS problem

2000-11-06 Thread Michael Meskes
Here's what I get doing a commit: Protocol error: 'Directory' missingE Protocol error: 'Directory' missingE ... Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!