On 24-okt-03, at 17:37, Bruce Momjian wrote:
It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test
against
current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
The current list is at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-
platforms.html
--
Bruce Momjian
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 22:29:04 +0200 Peter Eisentraut
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman writes:
*** ./expected/privileges.out Thu Oct 9 20:49:31 2003
--- ./results/privileges.outSat Oct 25 12:04:45 2003
***
*** 247,253
(1 row)
CREATE FUNCTION testf
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> configure: using CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing
> checking whether the C compiler still works... no
> configure: error: cannot proceed
> oink% gcc -v
> Reading specs from
> /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-solaris2.6/2.8.1/specs
> gcc version 2.8.1
>
> CFLAGS="-g -O2" ./con
Am Sa, den 25.10.2003 schrieb Noèl Köthe um 01:17:
> reports of these slower systems will follow but they need a bit more time:
> Linux crest 2.4.20 #1 Wed Mar 5 01:39:17 EST 2003 m68k unknown
Peter gave me this patch for m68k:
-- src/include/port/linux.h.orig Sat Oct 25 13:45:44 2003
+++
Larry Rosenman writes:
> *** ./expected/privileges.out Thu Oct 9 20:49:31 2003
> --- ./results/privileges.out Sat Oct 25 12:04:45 2003
> ***
> *** 247,253
> (1 row)
>
> CREATE FUNCTION testfunc3(int) RETURNS int AS 'select 2 * $1;' LANGUAGE
> sql; -- fail
> - ERROR: permiss
Bruce Momjian writes:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
After the just-committed fix, Tru64 5.1 alpha is OK with both cc and gcc.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
>
> The current list is at:
>
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
here are some build reports. Its all on Debian GNU/Linux
Regression testing on AIX 5 using 7.4beta5:
polymorphism ... ok
stats... ok
== shutting down postmaster ==
==
All 93 tests passed.
==
bash-2.05$ uname -a
AIX sn2 1 5 0044276A4C00
checki
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 18:35:06 +0200 Peter Eisentraut
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Eisentraut writes:
FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE alpha
BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the
template wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure.
I've commit
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE alpha
>
> BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template
> wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure.
I've committed a fix for the CFLAGS handling, and now this platform works
perfectly.
--
Peter Ei
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > In fact, another question is why this alpha test is only done in
> > freebsd?
>
> Ask that to the maintainers of the FreeBSD system compiler.
>
> > Certainly other alpha gcc platforms must have problems with -O2?
> > I am inclined to add some
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > In fact, another question is why this alpha test is only done in
> > freebsd?
>
> Ask that to the maintainers of the FreeBSD system compiler.
>
> > Certainly other alpha gcc platforms must have problems with -O2?
> > I am inclined to add some
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 10:14:14 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> After further consideration, I think that the recent patch series that
>> tried to centralize the CFLAGS handling in configure should be
>> reverted to configure.in revision 1.293.
Bruce Momjian writes:
> In fact, another question is why this alpha test is only done in
> freebsd?
Ask that to the maintainers of the FreeBSD system compiler.
> Certainly other alpha gcc platforms must have problems with -O2?
> I am inclined to add something to configure.in for all alpha compil
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >> After further consideration, I think that the recent patch series that
> >> tried to centralize the CFLAGS handling in configure should be reverted
> >> to configure.in revision 1.293. Otherwise, it's much to complicated to
> >> handle all the special cases. There is, a
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> > > > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template
> > > > wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure.
> > >
> > > template/alpha has:
> > >
> > > case $host_cpu in
>
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 10:00:59 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
> > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the
> > template wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after
> > configure.
>
> temp
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template
> > > wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure.
> >
> > template/alpha has:
> >
> > case $host_cpu in
> > alpha*) CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O
Am Sa, den 25.10.2003 schrieb Kurt Roeckx um 13:48:
> > Linux pergolesi 2.4.22 #1 SMP Mon Aug 25 20:56:25 CEST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
> >
> > It says i686 but its AMD Opteron:
>
> Just wondering, but does it run in 32 or 64 bit mode? I have a
> feeling it's only 32 bit mode ... Is it compiled for
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 01:03:37PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pgsql$ uname -a
> Linux pergolesi 2.4.22 #1 SMP Mon Aug 25 20:56:25 CEST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> It says i686 but its AMD Opteron:
Just wondering, but does it run in 32 or 64 bit mode? I have a
feeling it's only 32
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:37:32AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
checking build system type... i386-pc-solaris2.6
checking host system type... i386-pc-solaris2.6
checking whi
Am Sa, den 25.10.2003 schrieb Noèl Köthe um 01:17:
> > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
> >
> > The current list is at:
> >
> > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.htm
Bruce Momjian writes:
> > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template
> > wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure.
>
> template/alpha has:
>
> case $host_cpu in
> alpha*) CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O";; # alpha has problems with -O2
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 October 2003 16:38
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: [HACKERS] Call for port reports
>
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please
> test against current
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
>
> This one is OK after the recent pthread.h patch:
>
> NetBSD 1.6 (GENERIC) i386
>
> However, the compile pointed
Ports list updated:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Christopher Browne wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > It is time for people to report their port
Am Sa, den 25.10.2003 schrieb Noèl Köthe um 01:17:
> reports of these slower systems will follow but they need a bit more time:
>
> Linux casals 2.4.19-r4k-ip22 #1 Tue Mar 18 15:38:10 CET 2003 mips unknown
polymorphism ... ok
stats... ok
== shutting
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 12:46:39AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > I need this small patch so it properly detects I have unix domain
> > sockets. Otherwise no problems.
>
> What system? What happens without the patch? Details, please.
It's a Linux system with libc5.
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Thanks, fixed. Please retest.
I get farther, but I'm getting failures in the stats test that were
reported by earlier posters as well. In the server log I see:
LOG: could not bind socket for statistics collector: Can't assign
requested address
What could be the cause
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
>
> The current list is at:
>
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
here are some build reports. Its all on Debian GNU/Linux w
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 06:07:40PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
> In the last exciting episode, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) wrote:
> > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
> >
> > The current list is
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:37:32AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
>
> I need this small patch so it properly detects I have unix domain
> sockets. O
In the last exciting episode, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) wrote:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
>
> The current list is at:
>
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platf
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:37:32AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
I need this small patch so it properly detects I have unix domain
sockets. Otherwise no problems.
Kurt
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
>
> The current list is at:
>
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
... Much omitted .
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Does -O0 override an earlier -O2? I wonder if it is just complaining
> when it sees -O2 and is actually using -O for the compile. We still
> need to fix that, but I am curious.
If you specify -O2 anywhere and the compile step is invoked (for example,
you're not just pre
worked fine on slackware:
==
All 93 tests passed.
==
Linux phppgadmin 2.4.18 #2 Fri May 31 01:21:23 PDT 2002 i586 unknown
oh... different kernel, different filesystem
Robert Treat
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 16:37, Rod Taylor wrote:
> Linux ns2 2.4.20-x
Bruce Momjian writes:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
This one is OK after the recent pthread.h patch:
NetBSD 1.6 (GENERIC) i386
However, the compile pointed out that in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-auth.c
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template
> > > wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure.
> >
> > template/alpha has:
> >
> > case $host_cpu in
> > alpha*) CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O
Bruce Momjian writes:
> > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template
> > wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure.
>
> template/alpha has:
>
> case $host_cpu in
> alpha*) CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O";; # alpha has problems with -O2
>
Ports list updated:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please tes
Bruce Momjian writes:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
This one is OK:
OpenBSD 3.2 GENERIC#25 i386
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
>
> This one is OK:
>
> FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE alpha
>
> BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although
Thanks, fixed. Please retest.
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
>
> On
Ports list updated:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
I saw in your diff:
! psql: could not fork new process for connection: Resource temporarily
unavailable
so I figured it was something related to resources.
-
Heading updated too.
Ports list updated:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > It is time for people to report their po
Ports list updated:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please te
Linux ns2 2.4.20-xfs #2 Tue Apr 15 10:04:43 EDT 2003 i686 unknown
<-- SNIP -->
stats... FAILED
== shutting down postmaster ==
===
1 of 93 tests failed.
===
*** ./expected/stats.outSat Se
Bruce Momjian writes:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
This one is OK:
FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE alpha
BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template
wants -O. I manually modified
Bruce Momjian writes:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
On True64 5.1 (no "thread safety" enabled) with gcc:
In file included from postgresql-7.4beta5/src/port/thread.c:17:
/usr/include/pthread.h:290:3: #
I'm just being an idiot, it's obviously a limits problem on the
platform.
It has a default max user processes limit of 100, which I was hitting.
I shut down a bunch of desktop apps, and it's now passing:
92 of 93 tests passed, 1 failed test(s) ignored.
(random was the one failing).
So I guess yo
Looking a bit further into this, it looks like random tests are
failing. Seems like an issue with the test harness on this
platform.
Does someone want a shell account to debug?
mk
On Oct 24, 2003, at 21:39, Marko Karppinen wrote:
6 out of 93 tests failed:
date ... FAILED
On Oct 24, 2003, at 18:37, Bruce Momjian wrote:
It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test
against
current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
This is with beta 5.
Darwin marko.karppinen.fi 7.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 7.0.0: Wed Sep 24
15:48:39 PDT 2003; root:xnu/xnu-5
Bruce Momjian writes:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 krusty 1.3.22(0.78/3/2) 2003-03-18 09:20 i686 unknown unknown Cygwin
I suggest that we change the operating system column for this pla
Bruce Momjian writes:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
FreeBSD svr1.postgresql.org 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #4: Sat Sep 20
14:41:58 ADT 2003 i386
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ports list updated:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please tes
Ports list updated:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please te
Bruce Momjian writes:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
Linux sparc-sid 2.4.22-ctx17a #1 SMP Sam Okt 11 23:39:04 CEST 2003 sparc64 GNU/Linux
(32-bit build)
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Momjian writes:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
Linux bell 2.4.22-1-k7 #5 Sat Oct 4 14:11:12 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of b
Updated:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Adam Witney wrote:
> On 24/10/03 4:37 pm, "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It is time for people to report thei
On 24/10/03 4:37 pm, "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
>
> The current list is at:
>
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
The current list is at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.u
101 - 162 of 162 matches
Mail list logo