Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Johan Henselmans
On 24-okt-03, at 17:37, Bruce Momjian wrote: It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. The current list is at: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported- platforms.html -- Bruce Momjian

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 22:29:04 +0200 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: *** ./expected/privileges.out Thu Oct 9 20:49:31 2003 --- ./results/privileges.outSat Oct 25 12:04:45 2003 *** *** 247,253 (1 row) CREATE FUNCTION testf

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Kurt Roeckx writes: > configure: using CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing > checking whether the C compiler still works... no > configure: error: cannot proceed > oink% gcc -v > Reading specs from > /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-solaris2.6/2.8.1/specs > gcc version 2.8.1 > > CFLAGS="-g -O2" ./con

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Sa, den 25.10.2003 schrieb Noèl Köthe um 01:17: > reports of these slower systems will follow but they need a bit more time: > Linux crest 2.4.20 #1 Wed Mar 5 01:39:17 EST 2003 m68k unknown Peter gave me this patch for m68k: -- src/include/port/linux.h.orig Sat Oct 25 13:45:44 2003 +++

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Larry Rosenman writes: > *** ./expected/privileges.out Thu Oct 9 20:49:31 2003 > --- ./results/privileges.out Sat Oct 25 12:04:45 2003 > *** > *** 247,253 > (1 row) > > CREATE FUNCTION testfunc3(int) RETURNS int AS 'select 2 * $1;' LANGUAGE > sql; -- fail > - ERROR: permiss

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. After the just-committed fix, Tru64 5.1 alpha is OK with both cc and gcc. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Noèl Köthe
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. > > The current list is at: > > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html here are some build reports. Its all on Debian GNU/Linux

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Regression testing on AIX 5 using 7.4beta5: polymorphism ... ok stats... ok == shutting down postmaster == == All 93 tests passed. == bash-2.05$ uname -a AIX sn2 1 5 0044276A4C00 checki

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 18:35:06 +0200 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Eisentraut writes: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE alpha BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure. I've commit

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Peter Eisentraut writes: > FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE alpha > > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template > wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure. I've committed a fix for the CFLAGS handling, and now this platform works perfectly. -- Peter Ei

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > In fact, another question is why this alpha test is only done in > > freebsd? > > Ask that to the maintainers of the FreeBSD system compiler. > > > Certainly other alpha gcc platforms must have problems with -O2? > > I am inclined to add some

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > In fact, another question is why this alpha test is only done in > > freebsd? > > Ask that to the maintainers of the FreeBSD system compiler. > > > Certainly other alpha gcc platforms must have problems with -O2? > > I am inclined to add some

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 10:14:14 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: >> After further consideration, I think that the recent patch series that >> tried to centralize the CFLAGS handling in configure should be >> reverted to configure.in revision 1.293.

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > In fact, another question is why this alpha test is only done in > freebsd? Ask that to the maintainers of the FreeBSD system compiler. > Certainly other alpha gcc platforms must have problems with -O2? > I am inclined to add something to configure.in for all alpha compil

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Larry Rosenman wrote: > >> After further consideration, I think that the recent patch series that > >> tried to centralize the CFLAGS handling in configure should be reverted > >> to configure.in revision 1.293. Otherwise, it's much to complicated to > >> handle all the special cases. There is, a

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > > > > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template > > > > wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure. > > > > > > template/alpha has: > > > > > > case $host_cpu in >

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 10:00:59 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: > > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the > > template wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after > > configure. > > temp

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template > > > wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure. > > > > template/alpha has: > > > > case $host_cpu in > > alpha*) CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Sa, den 25.10.2003 schrieb Kurt Roeckx um 13:48: > > Linux pergolesi 2.4.22 #1 SMP Mon Aug 25 20:56:25 CEST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux > > > > It says i686 but its AMD Opteron: > > Just wondering, but does it run in 32 or 64 bit mode? I have a > feeling it's only 32 bit mode ... Is it compiled for

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 01:03:37PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pgsql$ uname -a > Linux pergolesi 2.4.22 #1 SMP Mon Aug 25 20:56:25 CEST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux > > It says i686 but its AMD Opteron: Just wondering, but does it run in 32 or 64 bit mode? I have a feeling it's only 32

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:37:32AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. checking build system type... i386-pc-solaris2.6 checking host system type... i386-pc-solaris2.6 checking whi

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Sa, den 25.10.2003 schrieb Noèl Köthe um 01:17: > > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. > > > > The current list is at: > > > > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.htm

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template > > wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure. > > template/alpha has: > > case $host_cpu in > alpha*) CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O";; # alpha has problems with -O2 >

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 October 2003 16:38 > To: PostgreSQL-development > Subject: [HACKERS] Call for port reports > > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please > test against current

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. > > This one is OK after the recent pthread.h patch: > > NetBSD 1.6 (GENERIC) i386 > > However, the compile pointed

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Christopher Browne wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes: > > It is time for people to report their port

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Sa, den 25.10.2003 schrieb Noèl Köthe um 01:17: > reports of these slower systems will follow but they need a bit more time: > > Linux casals 2.4.19-r4k-ip22 #1 Tue Mar 18 15:38:10 CET 2003 mips unknown polymorphism ... ok stats... ok == shutting

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 12:46:39AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes: > > > I need this small patch so it properly detects I have unix domain > > sockets. Otherwise no problems. > > What system? What happens without the patch? Details, please. It's a Linux system with libc5.

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > Thanks, fixed. Please retest. I get farther, but I'm getting failures in the stats test that were reported by earlier posters as well. In the server log I see: LOG: could not bind socket for statistics collector: Can't assign requested address What could be the cause

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Noèl Köthe
> It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. > > The current list is at: > > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html here are some build reports. Its all on Debian GNU/Linux w

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 06:07:40PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote: > In the last exciting episode, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) wrote: > > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. > > > > The current list is

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Kurt Roeckx writes: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:37:32AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. > > I need this small patch so it properly detects I have unix domain > sockets. O

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Christopher Browne
In the last exciting episode, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) wrote: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. > > The current list is at: > > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platf

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:37:32AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. I need this small patch so it properly detects I have unix domain sockets. Otherwise no problems. Kurt In

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Christopher Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. > > The current list is at: > > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html ... Much omitted .

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > Does -O0 override an earlier -O2? I wonder if it is just complaining > when it sees -O2 and is actually using -O for the compile. We still > need to fix that, but I am curious. If you specify -O2 anywhere and the compile step is invoked (for example, you're not just pre

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports -- Failure on Linux

2003-10-24 Thread Robert Treat
worked fine on slackware: == All 93 tests passed. == Linux phppgadmin 2.4.18 #2 Fri May 31 01:21:23 PDT 2002 i586 unknown oh... different kernel, different filesystem Robert Treat On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 16:37, Rod Taylor wrote: > Linux ns2 2.4.20-x

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. This one is OK after the recent pthread.h patch: NetBSD 1.6 (GENERIC) i386 However, the compile pointed out that in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-auth.c

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template > > > wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure. > > > > template/alpha has: > > > > case $host_cpu in > > alpha*) CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template > > wants -O. I manually modified the CFLAGS to -O after configure. > > template/alpha has: > > case $host_cpu in > alpha*) CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O";; # alpha has problems with -O2 >

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please tes

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. This one is OK: OpenBSD 3.2 GENERIC#25 i386 -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. > > This one is OK: > > FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE alpha > > BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Thanks, fixed. Please retest. --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. > > On

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html I saw in your diff: ! psql: could not fork new process for connection: Resource temporarily unavailable so I figured it was something related to resources. -

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Heading updated too. Ports list updated: http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > It is time for people to report their po

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please te

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports -- Failure on Linux

2003-10-24 Thread Rod Taylor
Linux ns2 2.4.20-xfs #2 Tue Apr 15 10:04:43 EDT 2003 i686 unknown <-- SNIP --> stats... FAILED == shutting down postmaster == === 1 of 93 tests failed. === *** ./expected/stats.outSat Se

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. This one is OK: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE alpha BUT: The default CFLAGS are set by configure to -O2, although the template wants -O. I manually modified

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. On True64 5.1 (no "thread safety" enabled) with gcc: In file included from postgresql-7.4beta5/src/port/thread.c:17: /usr/include/pthread.h:290:3: #

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Marko Karppinen
I'm just being an idiot, it's obviously a limits problem on the platform. It has a default max user processes limit of 100, which I was hitting. I shut down a bunch of desktop apps, and it's now passing: 92 of 93 tests passed, 1 failed test(s) ignored. (random was the one failing). So I guess yo

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Marko Karppinen
Looking a bit further into this, it looks like random tests are failing. Seems like an issue with the test harness on this platform. Does someone want a shell account to debug? mk On Oct 24, 2003, at 21:39, Marko Karppinen wrote: 6 out of 93 tests failed: date ... FAILED

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Marko Karppinen
On Oct 24, 2003, at 18:37, Bruce Momjian wrote: It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. This is with beta 5. Darwin marko.karppinen.fi 7.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 7.0.0: Wed Sep 24 15:48:39 PDT 2003; root:xnu/xnu-5

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. CYGWIN_NT-5.1 krusty 1.3.22(0.78/3/2) 2003-03-18 09:20 i686 unknown unknown Cygwin I suggest that we change the operating system column for this pla

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. FreeBSD svr1.postgresql.org 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #4: Sat Sep 20 14:41:58 ADT 2003 i386 -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please tes

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please te

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. Linux sparc-sid 2.4.22-ctx17a #1 SMP Sam Okt 11 23:39:04 CEST 2003 sparc64 GNU/Linux (32-bit build) -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. Linux bell 2.4.22-1-k7 #5 Sat Oct 4 14:11:12 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of b

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Adam Witney wrote: > On 24/10/03 4:37 pm, "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It is time for people to report thei

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Adam Witney
On 24/10/03 4:37 pm, "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. > > The current list is at: > > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

[HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'. The current list is at: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.u

<    1   2