Re: [HACKERS] Closing commitfest 2013-11

2014-01-23 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > With apologies to our beloved commitfest-mace-wielding CFM, commitfest > 2013-11 intentionally still contains a few open patches. I think that > CF is largely being ignored by most people now that we have CF 2014-01 > in progress. If we don't want to do anything about thes

Re: [HACKERS] Closing commitfest 2013-11

2014-01-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Vik Fearing wrote: > On 01/20/2014 10:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > I think the idea was that patch authors should take responsibility for > > pushing their patches forward to 2014-01 if they still wanted them > > considered. Quite a few patches already were moved that way, IIRC. > > > > Agreed thoug

Re: [HACKERS] Closing commitfest 2013-11

2014-01-21 Thread Vik Fearing
On 01/20/2014 10:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I think the idea was that patch authors should take responsibility for > pushing their patches forward to 2014-01 if they still wanted them > considered. Quite a few patches already were moved that way, IIRC. > > Agreed though that we shouldn't let them ju

Re: [HACKERS] Closing commitfest 2013-11

2014-01-21 Thread Pavel Stehule
Dne 21.1.2014 18:52 "Pavel Stehule" napsal(a): > > Hello > > I disagree with it. There was no any request to move "ready for commit" patches to next commitfest! I expected so only unfinishing patches should by moved there by their authors. I sent question to Peter E. But without reply, but Tom did

Re: [HACKERS] Closing commitfest 2013-11

2014-01-21 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello I disagree with it. There was no any request to move "ready for commit" patches to next commitfest! I expected so only unfinishing patches should by moved there by their authors. I sent question to Peter E. But without reply, but Tom did commits from thist list, so I expected so there is som

Re: [HACKERS] Closing commitfest 2013-11

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera writes: >> With apologies to our beloved commitfest-mace-wielding CFM, commitfest >> 2013-11 intentionally still contains a few open patches. I think that >> CF is largely being ignored by most people now that we have CF 2014-01 >

Re: [HACKERS] Closing commitfest 2013-11

2014-01-20 Thread Dean Rasheed
On 20 January 2014 21:24, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > * fault tolerant DROP IF EXISTS > I gave a look and it looks good for application. This wasn't > superceded by a future version, correct? > No, this hasn't been superceded. +1 for applying it. Regards, Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers maili

Re: [HACKERS] Closing commitfest 2013-11

2014-01-20 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera writes: > With apologies to our beloved commitfest-mace-wielding CFM, commitfest > 2013-11 intentionally still contains a few open patches. I think that > CF is largely being ignored by most people now that we have CF 2014-01 > in progress. If we don't want to do anything about th

[HACKERS] Closing commitfest 2013-11

2014-01-20 Thread Alvaro Herrera
With apologies to our beloved commitfest-mace-wielding CFM, commitfest 2013-11 intentionally still contains a few open patches. I think that CF is largely being ignored by most people now that we have CF 2014-01 in progress. If we don't want to do anything about these patches in the immediate fut