On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 22:30 +0100, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> Rod Taylor schrieb:
> > On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 12:48 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >
> >>Rod Taylor wrote:
> >>
> >>>Is there any way of bumping this limit or am I stuck breaking up the
> >>>transaction?
> >>
> >>Wow, I never heard of any
Rod Taylor schrieb:
> On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 12:48 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>>Rod Taylor wrote:
>>
>>>Is there any way of bumping this limit or am I stuck breaking up the
>>>transaction?
>>
>>Wow, I never heard of anyone reaching the limit :-( Sorry, you are
>>stuck (short of changing Comman
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does a subtransaction receive an independent command counter?
No such luck, and IIRC that would not be easy at all to change :-(
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: expl
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would it be possible to increment the command counter only for commands
> that do updates?
Probably that would work, but I'm unsure whether we have infrastructure
that would let you detect that reliably...
regards, tom lane
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 12:48 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Rod Taylor wrote:
> > Is there any way of bumping this limit or am I stuck breaking up the
> > transaction?
>
> Wow, I never heard of anyone reaching the limit :-( Sorry, you are
> stuck (short of changing CommandId to 64 bits, which woul
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Rod Taylor wrote:
Is there any way of bumping this limit or am I stuck breaking up the
transaction?
Wow, I never heard of anyone reaching the limit :-( Sorry, you are
stuck (short of changing CommandId to 64 bits, which would bloat your
tables consi
Rod Taylor wrote:
> Is there any way of bumping this limit or am I stuck breaking up the
> transaction?
Wow, I never heard of anyone reaching the limit :-( Sorry, you are
stuck (short of changing CommandId to 64 bits, which would bloat your
tables considerably ...)
--
Alvaro Herrera
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 12:48 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Rod Taylor wrote:
> > Is there any way of bumping this limit or am I stuck breaking up the
> > transaction?
>
> Wow, I never heard of anyone reaching the limit :-( Sorry, you are
> stuck (short of changing CommandId to 64 bits, which woul
Is there any way of bumping this limit or am I stuck breaking up the
transaction?
ERROR: cannot have more than 2^32-1 commands in a transaction
--
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
