On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-08-31 16:22:54 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>> Is it correct to switch 2015-09 commitfest to inprogress now?
No, this was not correct, it is expected to begin tomorrow.
> Yea, isn't it only starting the 15th?
If my memory does
On 08/31/2015 03:34 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
+1 for making these dates more explicit
Yeah, I think being explicit would make life easier for newcomers.
Andreas
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgres
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Alexander Korotkov <
a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
>> On 2015-08-31 16:22:54 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>> > Is it correct to switch 2015-09 commitfest to inprogress now?
>>
>> Yea, isn't it only
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-08-31 16:22:54 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > Is it correct to switch 2015-09 commitfest to inprogress now?
>
> Yea, isn't it only starting the 15th?
AFICS, on the last developer meeting it was decided to start commitfests in
On 2015-08-31 16:22:54 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Is it correct to switch 2015-09 commitfest to inprogress now?
Yea, isn't it only starting the 15th? Can we add an option to display
days in the CF app?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@post
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Anyway - that CF is closed, but we seem to not have *any* CF open at this
> > point. Should we not make 2015-11 open?
>
> Yeah, switched.
Is it correct to switch 2015-09 commitf
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Anyway - that CF is closed, but we seem to not have *any* CF open at this
> point. Should we not make 2015-11 open?
Yeah, switched.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
>
>
> And the commit fest of 2015-07 is now closed with the following score:
> Committed: 58.
> Moved to next CF: 25.
> Rejected: 9.
> Returned with Feedback: 25.
> Total: 117.
> Thanks!
>
>
Ugh. Good to have it closed, but it seems we're st
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> wrote:
> >> Hello Hackers,
> >>
> >> There are a few "Needs Review" items remaining in the July commitfest.
> >> Reviewer
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Hello Hackers,
>>
>> There are a few "Needs Review" items remaining in the July commitfest.
>> Reviewers, please take action - you are holding up the commitfest.
>>
>> In additi
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> On 08/25/2015 09:39 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> -- Reload SSL certificates on SIGHUP: returned with feedback? I think
>> that this patch needs more work to be in a commitable state.
>
>
> Maybe I am being dense here, but I do not fee
On 08/25/2015 09:39 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
-- Reload SSL certificates on SIGHUP: returned with feedback? I think
that this patch needs more work to be in a commitable state.
Maybe I am being dense here, but I do not feel like I have gotten any
clear feedback which gives me a way forward wi
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Michael,
>
> * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> -- Default Roles: Stephen, are you planning to work on that for next CF?
>
> Yup!
OK. Fine for me. I have moved the patch to next CF, even if I
mentioned having marked it
On 08/25/2015 10:39 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Hello Hackers,
There are a few "Needs Review" items remaining in the July commitfest.
Reviewers, please take action - you are holding up the commitfest.
In addition to these items, there
Michael,
* Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> -- Default Roles: Stephen, are you planning to work on that for next CF?
Yup!
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> -- Support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE: returned with feedback? The
> author mentioned that patch will be reworked but there has been no new
> version around it seems.
>
Moved to the next commitfest.
Regards,
--
FabrÃzio d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/25/2015 12:39 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> -- self-defined policy for sepgsql regression test, returned with
> feedback? The regressions are broken as mentioned at the end of
> the thread.
I am in the process of getting a VM setup with an appro
Hi,
On 08/25/2015 02:44 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
-- merging pgbench logs: returned with feedback or bump? Fabien has
concerns about performance regarding fprintf when merging the logs.
Fabien, Tomas, thoughts?
-- pgbench - per-transacti
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
>> -- merging pgbench logs: returned with feedback or bump? Fabien has
>> concerns about performance regarding fprintf when merging the logs.
>> Fabien, Tomas, thoughts?
>> -- pgbench - per-transaction and aggregated logs: returned with
>> fe
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 08/25/2015 10:39 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> - 12 patches are waiting on author:
>
> These can all be marked as Returned with good conscience, they've gotten at
> least some feedback.
Fine for me. I'll notify each thread individuall
-- merging pgbench logs: returned with feedback or bump? Fabien has
concerns about performance regarding fprintf when merging the logs.
Fabien, Tomas, thoughts?
-- pgbench - per-transaction and aggregated logs: returned with
feedback or bump to next CF? Fabien, Tomas, thoughts?
I think that bo
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
>
> There are a few "Needs Review" items remaining in the July commitfest.
> Reviewers, please take action - you are holding up the commitfest.
>
> In addition to these items, there are a bunch of items in "Ready for
> Com
Heikki,
* Heikki Linnakangas (hlinn...@iki.fi) wrote:
> >* self-defined policy for sepgsql regression test
>
> Stephen: would you have the time to handle this, please?
We'll definitely get this addressed soon. Apologies for taking so long
to get to it, was in Brazil last week and over the weeke
* extends pgbench expressions with functions
Robert signed up as reviewer for this a long time ago. Ping, do you still
plan to review this?
I seem to recall that I nominated Robert when adding the patch, because
this is an extension of his expression patch. So the "sign up" is really
just a
On 2015/08/10 17:10, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Heikki Linnakangas mailto:hlinn...@iki.fi>> wrote:
* Join pushdown support for foreign tables
Ashutosh, KaiGai, Etsuro: You signed up as reviewers in spring, but
there hasn't been any activity during th
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
>
> There are a few "Needs Review" items remaining in the July commitfest.
> Reviewers, please take action - you are holding up the commitfest.
>
> In addition to these items, there are a bunch of items in "Ready for
> Co
On 08/10/2015 10:46 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
* Unique Joins
Still needs to be reviewed. Any volunteers?
Can take this one up, if its within my limits.
Thanks! I've added you as reviewer to that.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> * Parallel Seq scan
>>
>
> Jeff, Haribabu, you're signed up as reviewers. How's it going?
>
The current state of the patch is that there are few comments by
Jeff and others which I need to take care, however it would have
been better
>
> * Unique Joins
>>
>
> Still needs to be reviewed. Any volunteers?
>
>
>
Can take this one up, if its within my limits.
Hello Hackers,
There are a few "Needs Review" items remaining in the July commitfest.
Reviewers, please take action - you are holding up the commitfest.
In addition to these items, there are a bunch of items in "Ready for
Committer" state. Committers: please help with those.
* extends pgbe
30 matches
Mail list logo
