Re: [HACKERS] Companies involved in development

2002-08-16 Thread Iavor Raytchev
I think the areas are at least two - - funding - who funds it and areas that need funding - PR - what I described in my previous mail These are pretty separated. Iavor ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMA

Re: [HACKERS] Companies involved in development

2002-08-16 Thread Iavor Raytchev
Bruce Momjian wrote: > I am willing to talk to anyone about this. There is a reason my phone > number is in my signature (note new phone number; I just moved.) > > Also, I am willing to make trips to companies to talk about > PostgreSQL. > I can't make 100's of trips a year, but I try to do at

Re: [HACKERS] Companies involved in development

2002-08-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ross J. Reedstrom wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 11:05:07AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I think we are going to see more company-funded developers working on > > PostgreSQL. There are a handful now, but I can see lots more coming. > > I am going to work on getting those funding companies mo

Re: [HACKERS] Companies involved in development

2002-08-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
Robert Treat wrote: > On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 17:13, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 11:05:07AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I think we are going to see more company-funded developers working on > > > PostgreSQL. There are a handful now, but I can see lots more coming. > >

Re: [HACKERS] Companies involved in development

2002-08-15 Thread Robert Treat
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 17:13, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 11:05:07AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I think we are going to see more company-funded developers working on > > PostgreSQL. There are a handful now, but I can see lots more coming. > > I am going to work on getti

Re: [HACKERS] Companies involved in development

2002-08-15 Thread Ross J. Reedstrom
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 11:05:07AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I think we are going to see more company-funded developers working on > PostgreSQL. There are a handful now, but I can see lots more coming. > I am going to work on getting those funding companies more visibility. > We originally w

Re: [HACKERS] Companies involved in development

2002-08-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
Of course, any funding information would be shared by the core group so they are involved, but not shared to the general list until the company wishes. --- Andrew Sullivan wrote: > I think I spelled -advocacy correctly thi

Re: [HACKERS] Companies involved in development

2002-08-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
I am willing to talk to anyone about this. There is a reason my phone number is in my signature (note new phone number; I just moved.) Also, I am willing to make trips to companies to talk about PostgreSQL. I can't make 100's of trips a year, but I try to do at least on a month. I just did one

Re: [HACKERS] Companies involved in development

2002-08-15 Thread Andrew Sullivan
I think I spelled -advocacy correctly this time. On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 05:34:13PM +0200, Hans-J?rgen Sch?nig wrote: > I think it would be a huge benefit for the community to have some more > company-funding. This would lead to the implementation of some features > people need urgently (replic

Re: [HACKERS] Companies involved in development

2002-08-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
I will add something about the BSD license to the advocacy web page I am trying to put together. My list is: P O S T G R E S Q L A D V O C A C Y Current at ftp://candle.pha.pa.us/pub/postgresql/advocacy. Quotations Company users B

Re: [HACKERS] Companies involved in development

2002-08-15 Thread Hans-Jürgen Schönig
I think it would be a huge benefit for the community to have some more company-funding. This would lead to the implementation of some features people need urgently (replication in the core and so forth). On the other hand a better product makes even more developers work for PostgreSQL. We were

[HACKERS] Companies involved in development

2002-08-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
I think we are going to see more company-funded developers working on PostgreSQL. There are a handful now, but I can see lots more coming. I am going to work on getting those funding companies more visibility. We originally were concerned that such involvement may harm the development process, b