Re: [HACKERS] Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?

2008-07-28 Thread Hiroshi Saito
Hi Marko-san. Thanks! It is comfortable.:-) Regards, Hiroshi Saito - Original Message - From: "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 7/28/08, Hiroshi Saito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please correct one mistake of mine...sorry. This patch solved problem of win32.:-) You mean the

Re: [HACKERS] Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?

2008-07-28 Thread Marko Kreen
On 7/28/08, Hiroshi Saito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please correct one mistake of mine...sorry. > This patch solved problem of win32.:-) You mean the += -lws2_32 must be after PGXS? Ok, but moving the PGXS line is not right as it should after all variables are set. I moved the SHLIB_LINK +=

Re: [HACKERS] Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?

2008-07-28 Thread Hiroshi Saito
Hi Marko-san. Great thanks!! Please correct one mistake of mine...sorry. This patch solved problem of win32.:-) Regards, Hiroshi Saito - Original Message - From: "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 7/28/08, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/25/08, Hiroshi Saito <[EMAIL

Re: [HACKERS] Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?

2008-07-28 Thread Marko Kreen
On 7/28/08, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/25/08, Hiroshi Saito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I tackled with hope temporarily. It seems that some adjustment is still > > required. > > http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/plproxy/ > > However, windows user desires to use. Of course,

Re: [HACKERS] Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?

2008-07-28 Thread Marko Kreen
On 7/25/08, Hiroshi Saito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tackled with hope temporarily. It seems that some adjustment is still > required. > http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/plproxy/ > However, windows user desires to use. Of course, it is also me. > Regards, > Hiroshi Saito Thanks, I applied t

Re: [HACKERS] Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?

2008-07-25 Thread Hiroshi Saito
What is stopping you? Whether or not it works on Windows has (or should have) nothing to do with whether or not it is in core. I think that plproxy is great. However, the windows user did not complain. Because, build was not easy. Therefore, pginstaller has not chosen. Then, I thought that I w

Re: [HACKERS] Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?

2008-07-25 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Hiroshi Saito wrote: > Hi. > > I tackled with hope temporarily. It seems that some adjustment is > still required. > http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/plproxy/ > However, windows user desires to use. Of course, it is also me. What is stopping you? Whether or not it works on Windows has (or should

Re: [HACKERS] Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?

2008-07-25 Thread Hiroshi Saito
Hi. I tackled with hope temporarily. It seems that some adjustment is still required. http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/plproxy/ However, windows user desires to use. Of course, it is also me. Regards, Hiroshi Saito From: "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 09:37 +030