On 11/17/2012 05:10:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 11:33 -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> >
what's
> > indexed is the token pg_temp, used when
> > setting search_path.
> Actually, since this is the pg_temp alias for the search path, it is
> appropriate. So committed as is.
On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 11:33 -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 11/17/2012 12:19:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:10 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > > pg_temp-toindex.patch
> > > Puts pg_temp into the index of the docs.
> >
> > But there is no object called pg_temp. It alway
On 11/17/2012 12:19:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:10 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > pg_temp-toindex.patch
> > Puts pg_temp into the index of the docs.
>
> But there is no object called pg_temp. It always pg_temp_
> something. How should that be indexed?
My though
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:10 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>> pg_temp-toindex.patch
>> Puts pg_temp into the index of the docs.
> But there is no object called pg_temp. It always pg_temp_
> something. How should that be indexed?
We do in a lot of places, and tha
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:10 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> pg_temp-toindex.patch
> Puts pg_temp into the index of the docs.
But there is no object called pg_temp. It always pg_temp_
something. How should that be indexed?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
Hi,
2 patches:
pg_temp-toindex.patch
Puts pg_temp into the index of the docs.
(Line lengths are ugly so the change can
be easily reviewed.)
pg_temp-reformat.patch
Reformats the doc source after the
above patch. (Fixes line length.)
Regards,
Karl
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay f
