Le 12 juin 09 à 23:20, Tom Lane a écrit :
Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com writes:
Le 12 juin 09 à 21:49, Tom Lane a écrit :
It seems to me it could still do
with a lot more detail to specify what API the functions are really
expected to implement.
What's bothering me is the fuzziness
Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com writes:
I've been working some more on this documentation:
Applied with some editorialization. It seems to me it could still do
with a lot more detail to specify what API the functions are really
expected to implement.
regards,
Hi,
Le 12 juin 09 à 21:49, Tom Lane a écrit :
Applied with some editorialization.
Thanks a lot :)
It seems to me it could still do
with a lot more detail to specify what API the functions are really
expected to implement.
I'm sorry I'm not following... I guess you're talking about a
Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com writes:
Le 12 juin 09 à 21:49, Tom Lane a écrit :
It seems to me it could still do
with a lot more detail to specify what API the functions are really
expected to implement.
I'm sorry I'm not following... I guess you're talking about a better
Hi,
I've been working some more on this documentation:
Le 20 mai 09 à 18:10, Dimitri Fontaine a écrit :
- consistent signature update for 8.4 (recheck arg)
- compress/decompress non void example
This means the multi-column support part is still missing, as proper
english review too.
But
Hi,
Le 4 mai 09 à 14:24, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
There aren't a lot of people who have the experience to write that
documentation. So if you want to improve it, you will have to write
it, or at
least organize the outline. Others can help cleaning it up.
For the record, here's the
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 16:43:44 Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
The following documentation page explains the GiST API to extensions
authors:
I think we should be a little more verbose,
I didn't propose a real doc patch mainly because english isn't my native
language, and while you'll have to
Hi,
The following documentation page explains the GiST API to extensions authors:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/gist-implementation.htm
I think we should be a little more verbose, and at least explains some more
the big picture: same/consistent/union are responsible for
