On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 09:48 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > In various places in current HEAD we throw a checkpoint when we want to
> > be certain that all buffers have been flushed.
> >
> > In recovery, a checkpoint isn't always a restartpoint for two reasons:
> > timin
Simon Riggs wrote:
In various places in current HEAD we throw a checkpoint when we want to
be certain that all buffers have been flushed.
In recovery, a checkpoint isn't always a restartpoint for two reasons:
timing and rmgr state. This gives both a cause for the error and an
explanation of why
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 19:12 +0100, Gianni Ciolli wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 06:39:11PM +0100, Gianni Ciolli wrote:
> (...)
> > During a Warm Standby session using current HEAD I obtained the
> > following error on the standby node:
I think I understand the cause of these bugs in CVS HEAD no
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 06:39:11PM +0100, Gianni Ciolli wrote:
(...)
> During a Warm Standby session using current HEAD I obtained the
> following error on the standby node:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:56:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gianni Ciolli writes:
> > we found a bug while testing the late
Gianni Ciolli writes:
> we found a bug while testing the latest version of Hot Standby. Then
> we could reproduce it on the unpatched HEAD, so we are going to ignore
> it in the next few days.
You didn't actually say how to repeat it on unpatched HEAD.
regards, tom lane
Hello,
we found a bug while testing the latest version of Hot Standby. Then
we could reproduce it on the unpatched HEAD, so we are going to ignore
it in the next few days.
During a Warm Standby session using current HEAD I obtained the
following error on the standby node:
---8<--8<--8<--