Seeing failure on 8.1 as well.
BTW, I keep forwarding these, but is there any need? Are enough hackers on the
status change lists anyway?
/D
-Original Message-
From: "PG Build Farm"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 18/03/06 02:13:19
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> On Mar 8, 2006, at 13:01 , Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I have updated the /contrib and PL regression tests for
> > escape_string_warning. I can't test all the regressions but the build
> > farm will tell us soon enough.
>
> I see 'em turning green :) Thanks, Bruce.
On Mar 8, 2006, at 13:01 , Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have updated the /contrib and PL regression tests for
escape_string_warning. I can't test all the regressions but the build
farm will tell us soon enough.
I see 'em turning green :) Thanks, Bruce.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com
--
Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This seems pretty widespread.
>
> Try "universal" --- Bruce broke both contrib and PL regression tests
> last night, by not updating them for the change of escape_string_warning
> default.
I have updated the /contrib and PL regr
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This seems pretty widespread.
Try "universal" --- Bruce broke both contrib and PL regression tests
last night, by not updating them for the change of escape_string_warning
default.
regards, tom lane
On Mar 7, 2006, at 17:48 , Dave Page wrote:
The PGBuildfarm member snake had the following event on branch HEAD:
Status changed from OK to PLCheck failure
The snapshot timestamp for the build that triggered this
notification is: 2006-03-07 02:00:00
The specs of this machine are:
OS: Windows
> -Original Message-
> From: PG Build Farm
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 March 2006 02:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed
> from OK to PLCheck failure
>
>
> The PGBuildfarm member snake had the fol
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh dear - looks like my pg_freespacemap patch is getting its Windows
> testing :-(
> Dave - are you able to try out the attached patch?
Already committed an equivalent patch before seeing your message ...
regards, tom lane
"Dave Page" writes:
> And the fun continues :-)
> Info: resolving _MaxFSMPages by linking to __imp__MaxFSMPages (auto-import)
Fixed.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free spac
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Kirkwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 February 2006 10:17
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch
> HEAD Status changed from Make failure to Contrib
Dave Page wrote:
And the fun continues :-)
-Original Message-
From: PG Build Farm
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 February 2006 02:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed
from Make failure to Contrib failure
The PGBuildfarm member
And the fun continues :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: PG Build Farm
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 February 2006 02:16
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed
> from Make failure to Contrib failure
>
>
> The PGBuildfarm member sn
Just fixed in CVS. Thanks.
---
Dave Page wrote:
> And another failure on Snake
>
> /D
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: PG Build Farm
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 13 February 2006 02:10
> > To: [
Hello,
That's caused by small error in recent implementation of dealing with
multi-line queries.
I already have sent the patch to pgsql-patches
Regards,
Sergey
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Dave Page wrote:
> And another failure on Snake
>
> /D
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From:
And another failure on Snake
/D
> -Original Message-
> From: PG Build Farm
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 February 2006 02:10
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed
> from CVS-Unknown failure to Make failure
>
>
> The PGBuil
Bruce Momjian writes:
> How do people feel about having tabs displayed as 0x09? Should they be
> a literal tab?
If they're a literal tab they'll mess up the formatting that we just so
painstakingly put in. I'd personally vote for \t rather than \x09, but
other than that I agree with doing somet
How do people feel about having tabs displayed as 0x09? Should they be
a literal tab?
---
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> ***
> *** 2463,2469
>http://www.google.com/foo.bar.html"; target="_blank">YES
> ff-
---
> > From: Marko Kreen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 10 February 2006 15:07
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch
> > HEAD Status changed from OK to ContribCheck failure
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: Marko Kreen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 February 2006 15:07
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch
> HEAD Status changed from OK to ContribCheck failure
On 2/10/06, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/10/06, Dave Page wrote:
> > Something broke snake again :-(. Looks like tsearch2 through the haze of
> > my Lemsip... I hate winter :-(
>
> AFAIR the reason for different length of psql's '' header lines
> was database encoding being U
On 2/10/06, Dave Page wrote:
> Something broke snake again :-(. Looks like tsearch2 through the haze of
> my Lemsip... I hate winter :-(
AFAIR the reason for different length of psql's '' header lines
was database encoding being UNICODE not SQL_ASCII. Can this be the case
there?
--
marko
***
*** 2463,2469
http://www.google.com/foo.bar.html"; target="_blank">YES
ff-bg
! document.write(15);
--- 2463,2469
http://www.google.com/foo.bar.html"; target="_blank">YES
ff-bg
! \x09document.write(15);
\x09 is a '\t'.
On Feb 10, 2006, at 17:24 , Dave Page wrote:
Something broke snake again :-(. Looks like tsearch2 through the
haze of
my Lemsip... I hate winter :-(
Hope you feel better soon! I've been taking 1500 to 2000mg of vitamin
C daily to try to stay healthy.
As for snake, I can't offer much.
M
Something broke snake again :-(. Looks like tsearch2 through the haze of
my Lemsip... I hate winter :-(
/D
> -Original Message-
> From: PG Build Farm
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 February 2006 02:20
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PGBuildfarm member
Looks like the plperl changes hurt Snake :-(
C:/Perl/lib/CORE/win32iop.h:304:1: warning: "kill" redefined
In file included from ../../../src/include/c.h:821,
from ../../../src/include/postgres.h:48,
from SPI.xs:2:
../../../src/include/port.h:197:1: warning: this i
Sorry, I'm working on it
Dave Page wrote:
Looks like the tsearch2 update yesterday broke something :-(
Regards, Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 November 2005 02:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PGBuildfarm memb
Looks like the tsearch2 update yesterday broke something :-(
Regards, Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 November 2005 02:20
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status chang
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Here, the culprits are tfind() and tsearch(). These apparently aren't
>> "portable enough", but they seem to exist on all other platforms. Maybe
>> we could come up with a replacement on Windows? Are there simple
>> btree/hash
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:08:11AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
Looks like there more unprotable code in the recent changes to pgbench
:-(
Here, the culprits are tfind() and tsearch(). These apparently aren't
"portable enough", but they seem to exist on all other p
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:08:11AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Looks like there more unprotable code in the recent changes to pgbench
> :-(
Here, the culprits are tfind() and tsearch(). These apparently aren't
"portable enough", but they seem to exist on all other platforms. Maybe
we could come up
Looks like there more unprotable code in the recent changes to pgbench
:-(
Regards, Dave.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 September 2005 02:17
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch H
31 matches
Mail list logo
