On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 06/24/2015 11:11 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to implement triConsistent for only some of the strategy
>> numbers?
>>
>
> No.
>
> It looks like I would have to internally re-implement something like
>> shimTriConsistent
On 06/24/2015 11:11 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
Is there a way to implement triConsistent for only some of the strategy
numbers?
No.
It looks like I would have to internally re-implement something like
shimTriConsistentFn for each strategy number for which I don't want to
implement the ternary syst
Is there a way to implement triConsistent for only some of the strategy
numbers?
It looks like I would have to internally re-implement something like
shimTriConsistentFn for each strategy number for which I don't want to
implement the ternary system in full. Am I missing a trick?
Thanks,
Jeff