[HACKERS] GPL, readline, and static/dynamic linking

2001-02-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Here is an article about GPL and GPL version 3.0. http://icd.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=ArticlesSubSection=DisplayARTICLE_ID=92350VERSION_NUM=1 The interesting thing is that Stallman says: "Our position is that it makes no difference whether programs are linked

Re: [HACKERS] GPL, readline, and static/dynamic linking

2001-02-22 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Here is an article about GPL and GPL version 3.0. http://icd.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=ArticlesSubSection=DisplayARTICLE_ID=92350VERSION_NUM=1 The interesting thing is that Stallman says: "Our position is that it makes

Re: [HACKERS] GPL, readline, and static/dynamic linking

2001-02-22 Thread Nathan Myers
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:50:17AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: Let me add I don't agree with this, and find the whole GPL heavy-handedness very distasteful. Please, not this again. Is there a piss-and-moan-about-the-GPL schedule posted somewhere? Either PG is in compliance, or it's not.