Josh Berkus wrote:
> Euler,
>
> > It should but it's not implemented yet. There is no difficulty in doing
> > it. But I want to propose the following idea: if some object depends on
> > another object and its type is 'DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL' we could
> > grant/revoke privileges automagically to it. O
Euler,
> It should but it's not implemented yet. There is no difficulty in doing
> it. But I want to propose the following idea: if some object depends on
> another object and its type is 'DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL' we could
> grant/revoke privileges automagically to it. Or maybe create another
> type o
--- Josh Berkus escreveu:
> However,
> GRANT SELECT ON TABLE table1 TO someuser;
> ... works, while
> GRANT SELECT ON SEQUENCE table1_id_seq TO someuser;
> ... raises an error.
>
> This is inconsistent. Do people agree with me that the parser
> should
> accept "SEQUENCE" there, since th
Folks,
Just got tripped up by this:
GRANT SELECT ON table1 TO someuser;
GRANT SELECT ON table1_id_seq TO someuser;
both work
However,
GRANT SELECT ON TABLE table1 TO someuser;
... works, while
GRANT SELECT ON SEQUENCE table1_id_seq TO someuser;
... raises an error.
This is inconsiste
