Seems to me there's a bug in HEAD (and probably old branches
as well) when compiled with HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP. As shown below
It sometimes shows things like -6.-70 secs where 8.3
showed -6.70 secs.
I think the attached one-liner patch fixes this, as well as
another roundoff regression between
Ron Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seems to me there's a bug in HEAD (and probably old branches
as well) when compiled with HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP. As shown below
It sometimes shows things like -6.-70 secs where 8.3
showed -6.70 secs.
I think the attached one-liner patch fixes this, as well
Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, bug all the way back --- applied.
I don't much like the forced rounding to two digits here, but changing
that doesn't seem like material for back-patching. Are you going to
fix that up while working on your other patches?
Gladly. I hate that too.
I think I can also
Ron Mayer wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, bug all the way back --- applied.
I don't much like the forced rounding to two digits here, but changing
that doesn't seem like material for back-patching. Are you going to
fix that up while working on your other patches?
Gladly. I hate that too.
