Hello,
Has anyone played with this? Seen any results? It looks like most
testing is being done on Mac OSX (via buildfarm).
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion,
On 1/11/13 4:03 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Has anyone played with this? Seen any results? It looks like most
testing is being done on Mac OSX (via buildfarm).
Works fine. We also have non-OSX tests on the buildfarm for it.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On fre, 2010-06-11 at 07:00 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The second problem is that the prototype check for accept() fails.
This
is because glibc defines the second argument to be a transparent
union, apparently to make it look like a lot of things at once.
clang
apparently doesn't
On fre, 2010-06-25 at 15:49 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
For the record, here is a patch that would address these issues.
At the moment, I'm waiting to get my hands on the new version 2.7 of
clang to see if some of these issues have gone away.
Considering that clang already helped us
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
So, clang 2.7 didn't fix it. Do we want to proceed with my patch or
leave clang unsupported?
Given that the patch breaks plperl, I'd vote no ... but in any case
right now is not the time to be applying it. Maybe it would be useful
to put it in HEAD
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:49:40 -0400, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
wrote:
For the record, here is a patch that would address these issues.
At the moment, I'm waiting to get my hands on the new version 2.7 of
clang to see if some of these issues have gone away.
Considering that clang
On ons, 2010-06-30 at 20:10 +0200, Gibheer wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:49:40 -0400, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
wrote:
For the record, here is a patch that would address these issues.
At the moment, I'm waiting to get my hands on the new version 2.7 of
clang to see if some of
On fre, 2010-06-11 at 07:00 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The second problem is that the prototype check for accept() fails.
This
is because glibc defines the second argument to be a transparent
union, apparently to make it look like a lot of things at once.
clang
apparently doesn't
On tor, 2010-06-10 at 09:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Quick testing shows that clang doesn't get through the configure stage
on this Debian system -- it looks like some amount of better integration
with glibc might be needed. Building with llvm-gcc
Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp writes:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
max_locks_per_xact != max_locks_per_xact)
Looks like a bug.
Ah, it should be compared with the same name field in ControlFile.
Yeah, obvious typo, please commit.
On ons, 2010-06-09 at 09:59 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
The most heavily platform dependent part of the code is the spinlock
implementation. You might want to check that it actually uses the
version optimized for your platform, not the (much slower) generic
implementation based on semaphores.
On tis, 2010-06-08 at 12:12 +0200, P. Caillaud wrote:
I'd like to experiment on compiling postgres with LLVM (either llvm-gcc or
clang) on Linux, is it supported ? Where should I start ?
The way to choose a compiler is
./configure CC=your-cc ...other...options...
We support a fair amount of
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Quick testing shows that clang doesn't get through the configure stage
on this Debian system -- it looks like some amount of better integration
with glibc might be needed. Building with llvm-gcc works fine, but I
understand that using llvm-gcc with
On tor, 2010-06-10 at 11:55 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Quick testing shows that clang doesn't get through the configure stage
on this Debian system -- it looks like some amount of better
integration with glibc might be needed.
Some details on this ...
configure has two problems. The
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
[ assorted LLVM warnings ]
dt_common.c:818:75: warning: more data arguments than '%' conversions
[-Wformat-extra-args]
sprintf(str + strlen(str), (min != 0) ?
%+03d:%02d : %+03d, hour, min);
~~~^
[and a
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Some new warnings, however:
xlog.c:7759:22: warning: self-comparison always results in a constant
value
max_locks_per_xact != max_locks_per_xact)
^
Looks like a bug.
Ah, it should be compared
On Jun 8, 2010, at 12:12 , P. Caillaud wrote:
I'd like to experiment on compiling postgres with LLVM (either llvm-gcc or
clang) on Linux, is it supported ? Where should I start ?
Setting the environment variables CC and perhabs LD to your favorite compile
before running ./configure should do
Hello,
I'd like to experiment on compiling postgres with LLVM (either llvm-gcc or
clang) on Linux, is it supported ? Where should I start ?
Thanks ;)
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
18 matches
Mail list logo
